HighwayCello
- Please Feel free to add comments and please click this edit link to do so. I value all feedback.
- Discussions are archived every time this gets too big. If you said something that got archived, just refer to which archive it's in (most recent in the last number going backwards).
- I will usually reply on your talk page (if such action is required) and will leave a note here in summary of points made. If a discussion is getting long (more than one or two questions or statements) then I may just post replies here.
- Your comment's wording will not be edited but layout may do. I may however change the headings to increase the ease of navigation.
- Vandalism will always be reverted however a note will be placed at the bottom and a link (to show the changes made) put.
- Any profanity, vulgarity or other harmful text will be editted out immediately using the <vulgarity /> tag or, in extreme cases, it deleted and a link put to the version with the harmful text included.
- Please note that my timezone is GMT, and that I still am in school, (summer!) so please excuse my brushing off/shouting/screaming/grumpiness/anger/annoyance at anti-social hours.
- If your old comment was left here was in relation to Admin Coaching, it may have been archived at User talk:HighwayCello/Archive/15, to cut down the load here.
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Lar and Petros AC
edit- Thanks for the reminder... MyNameIsNotBob has decided he's gotten what he wanted. So I've updated accordingly. Theoretically Petros471 and I are ready for new assignments... I may want to take a bit of a break from coaching and try to get caught up on some other matters I am behind on though... ++Lar: t/c 21:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, I'm not really able to take on anyone else. I've now just managed to get myself into a position (now you've taken over coordinating) that I don't have to do anything on Wikipedia. I'll probably just be dropping in occasionally to block the odd vandal and close an afd discussion, but I don't want to commit to anything at the moment. Petros471 22:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep me on the list as inactive for now. Unless I find I have to leave Wikipedia fully (not the case at the moment, but could happen depending on what I end up doing in my life) I'd still like to help out with the program. Petros471 22:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, just treated them in same way as anyone else. Petros471 22:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I would need another partner to be able to take a new coachee on... pretty heads down with other stuff. SO mark me inactive for now too i guess. ++Lar: t/c 17:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep me on the list as inactive for now. Unless I find I have to leave Wikipedia fully (not the case at the moment, but could happen depending on what I end up doing in my life) I'd still like to help out with the program. Petros471 22:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Re: Admin coaching
editYeah, I'm okay to receive a trainee now. Just tell me when I've been assigned, and I'll be ready to go. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I don't really care. It looks like all the free admins are fairly new as well, but again, no preference either way. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Re: Admin Coaching
editI left that a long time ago. I'm not even an admin! I'm kind of busy for it anyways. If you can take my name off the list, great. Thank you for letting me know I was still on there! --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 22:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Just noticed that linked to my talk page- maybe some of the other templates still do as well? Petros471 23:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Re:Admin Coaching
editYeah, you can give me a person to train for admin coaching. Tell me whenever you find someone, and I'll gladly start from there. Nishkid64 23:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Re:Esperanza Admin coaching - October 29 - New recruits
editI'd love to recieve a trainee! I'll become a permanent helper at Admin Coaching if it's acceptable that I'm not an admin and I've been around for less than a year. Helping less experienced editors is something I really want to do. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 23:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the confusion. If you look in the requests, you'll see a unsigned comment by me. It was actually signed, but my the four tildes must of been placed in the volunteers. I'm no admin, but I know enough about wikipedia to assist a less knowledgable trainee, but, I actually requested a coach myself, and I'm not sure if I could help enough. Sorry about the mess. I hope I can help coach someone someday :). --andrewI20Talk 03:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Admin coaching - October 29
editHi Highway,
Yes, I'm ready for a new trainee. I had let Petros know I was ready for a new one, but never got a response; the same thing happened previously. From what I gather above, you're taking over the coordination. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 06:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
RE:Admin Coaching - New recruits
editI am continuing to be interested in recieving admin coaching. I would certainly love to recieve a coach. Thanks for following up--¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?!Join Esperanza! 08:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
BTW: I think instead of calling them coaches, we should call them mentors--¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?!Join Esperanza! 08:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:HighwayCello, where will coaching take place? Esperanza subpage? My talk page? Coaches' talk page?--¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?!Join Esperanza! 08:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
::Thanks HighwayCello, I also wish to have admin-coaching before going for an RfA. Please assign some volunteers for the coaching process. Regards, Shyam (T/C) 08:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
RE:Admin coaching - Coaches
editHi HC! I am actually coaching User:Richardshusr at User talk:Richardshusr/Admin coaching. Szvest 09:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
You can count on me. I'm ready to train someone. NCurse work 09:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi HighwayCello. Me and Ilyanep were assigned Master of Puppets, but it looks like he's taking a break (no edits since Oct 5). So I could be assigned another coachee, and if MoP returns, I wouldn't mind coaching him as well. Thanks for taking over this project! --Fang Aili talk 14:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I gotcha. Sorry about missing my already-listed name! Yes I can be assigned a new coachee. Btw, did you become an admin while I wasn't looking? :) --Fang Aili talk 17:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Re: Admin coaching - October 30 - Held requests
editHi there — yes, I am still interested in receiving coaching. Now that I'm a bit more active again, I should be able to benefit more from it. Thanks! Feezo (Talk) 23:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
editThe Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For going above and beyond the call in helping Wikipedia grow and improve. Sharkface217 00:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
Page formatting
editHi HighwayCello, just thought I'd let you know your talk page header doesn't display well in Firefox - the contents box overwrites the bottom part of the category tracker summary box. Only a n00b with wiki, so no suggestions how to fix, sorry. RoscoHead 00:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
admin coaching for User:Swatjester
editYep, I'm still interested, though my RFA about 6 months ago failed and I'm not planning another one until probably December. I'm still interested in the admin coaching. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 01:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Discontinuation of admin coaching
editI wish to discontinue my admin coaching with Zapptastic / Zappa.jake (Deryck Chan's is already stopped due to inactivity). Regards, Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 01:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
new coachee
editSoumyasch would be great. :) --Fang Aili talk 04:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 30th.
edit
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
RE:Admin Coaching
editYes, I am still interested on Admin and would greatly appreciate it if you could organise it. Jasrocks (talk) 07:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Charizard... again!
editHoly Hell Hound!! I don't know what gets me more; the fact that I got pulled into this user's twisted rage, or the fact that he had to "research" about me on my user page before coming up with an insult. Some people just need to be sedated and locked away. -サターン・ヨッシー HAPPY HALLOWEEN 08:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Y'all will be pleased to know that I have fully enshrined this story in my Keepers subpage, at the bottom section. R&R if you please. :) Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 22:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza User Page Award
editHi HighwayCello! You've signed up to be a judge for the Esperanza User Page Award! You'll have three user pages to examine. The user pages you get coincide with your signup number. So if you signed up to be a judge in spot 1 than you will get nominations 1-3. Pick your favorite one, and list it in the finalist section. After all 5 judges have chosen a finalist it's time to award them 1-10 points in the four categories:
- Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
- Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
- Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
- General niceness: at the judges' discretion
Please remember to include Subpages in your judging criteria. See the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.
Keep in mind that your scores are confidential! Email Celestianpower with your scores and final picks. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced! Thanks. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 09:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
my template headers
editThank you for bringing to my attention some possible problems with the templates. If you have further concerns about them, leaving comments on their respective talk pages is the usual problem. You can also provide constructive criticism at {{PokePage}} or at the PCP talk page - which i see that you have. It seems from your edit comments that you found PAGENAME particularly inappropriate. I'll address the other issues at the talk page. This was a first test run, following the directions laid out at the main template page. The PAGENAME issue was actually being addressed as you were removing the templates. The problem was with {{PokeVideoGamesIntro}}. I'm in the middle of working on a solution, even while you were removing the headers. I ask that you be civil and refrain from deragotory, unconstructive statements like "train wreck" and "mess". With more feedback before i had started this, perhaps problems like these could have avoided. I will ask that you attempt to refrain from outright removals of the templates for the time being. I hope you can show the respect mandated by wikipedia and help to improve upon these templates as opposed to removals. If you are dead st against them, continue to make your case at the PCP talk page, because as of now i have only garnished support for them and you are essentially going against consensus. -Zappernapper 17:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editI do not wish to continue admin coaching.
Also, I did not "abandon" Wisden17, I left WP for reasons I will not disclose. You may wish to modify your message to him to reflect that.
If you have any further questions, please contact me via email, not talkpage. Jaxl 00:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
HI
editThis is as a follow up to the message you posted on my talk page. I am very inactive in Wikipedia these days, due to some work that eats up most of my time in real life. So, feel free to delist me off the coachee's list. --soumসৌমোyasch 16:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi HighwayCello. Since Soumyasch doesn't want admin coaching right now, feel free to assign me a new coachee. Thanks! --Fang Aili talk 16:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I see you've assigned me Jasrocks. I will wait until he confirms his interest with you. --Fang Aili talk 16:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Ok, I got it. Thanks. :) --Fang Aili talk 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)- Hi. Your signature-end seems to be too bright. Consider mending it? Regards, _o/ — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 17:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Since you're...
editSure! I was actually considering signing up, so I'll be glad to be on the list. :) By the way, I'm not sure if the discussions that got moved to the Admin Coaching main page are meant to be there, but they make the programs page really long, since everything on the Admin Coaching page is transcluded onto there. Would it be okay to put a shorter description of admin coaching there, with a link to the real page? -- Natalya 18:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
:Awards given to admin coaching? Regardless; I'll shorten what is there, and you are most welcome to add what you think would be useful! -- Natalya 19:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
No worries. :) -- Natalya 19:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
You read my mind! I was actually logging to tell you not to worry, that I'm going to put it up later this morning (well, morning for me), which will give me some time to mull over it once it's up. I've just been brainstorming how to phrase things that past couple of days. It's almost time - exciting! -- Natalya 12:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Shyam Bihari's admin coaching
editYes, it has begun. A lot of questions, suggestions. But if Mr. Lefty doesn't mind, you can assign him to an other editor (there is a lot waiting for a coach), because I can handle it. If it's not possible, then we will work together. NCurse work 20:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I think that'll work. Anything to clear the perpetual AC backlog. I'd be happy to take on a coachee of my own. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Potential restructuring
editHey there. There's an important debate occuring at the WP:PCP talk page about taking down and redirecting the majority of the 493 Pokemon creature articles, and I think you'll need to make some comments. This could mean the destruction of the Bulbasaur and Torchic FAs that I think you did a lot of work on, and I wouldn't know about how you feel about that, but maybe all this is for the best. Hope we can upgrade the project throrugh this. Best, Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 19:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Coach offer
editI know you're jumping with replies, but I need to make you read this. I would like you to be an admin coach, I know you're not an admin, but you've more than proved your ability on the coach page. I've cleared all the archived requests, so the next coaches that enter will be taking coaches from the top of the list. What are you thoughts? (Please! :) Highway Grammar Enforcer! 20:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
*hides in corner* This job is harder than it looks! I'll give you a student, and go back to my medication. Highway Grammar Enforcer! 21:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I'll take ten, or however many you have left over. Please have them meet me at the Wikipedia:Admin school. Their first assignment will be to help me get things started there. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to help. If you need help with anything else, just let me know. The Transhumanist 23:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Learning to admin
editHey, thanks for your message re:Esperanza admin coaching. I'm still very keen to be coached in the ways of the Admin and have taken steps I consider important to do so. Please consider my application for assitance live, active and keen! Cheers! Budgiekiller 23:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Esperanza Admin coaching - November 2 - Held requests
editIn reply to User talk:AMK152#Esperanza Admin coaching - November 2 - Held requests. Yes, I am still interested. -AMK152 00:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editYes, I would certainly like to receive
ninjaadmin coaching. I won't be able to start editing regularly until about the 8th, but that's close enough now that I'd like to move on with it. Thank you! Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 02:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA
editI've replied. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
and again.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello HighwayCello,
All I was originally asking for was a confirmation that you would abide by the "gentleman's agreement" that was recommended the archives of WT:DYK that
- The updater should not choose their own nominations at all
- A second thing that wasn't discussed, but which I feel follows is that one should not select nominations by WikiProjects with which one is involved or close Wikipedian associates, should there be an objection or query raised about that nomination. As such, having relaunched WP:EURO and Portal:Eurovision and encouraged Eurovision people to participate in DYK, I have only chosen the Eurovision nominations of my wikiproject team-mates if there are no objections. On the few occasions that there were objections against the Eurovision, I have abstained from choosing them, despite my personal support for the nominations. In your case that would correspond to only picking Pokemon and Nintendo items of other users and only if there were no dissent.
- I have to reiterate that the only reason I asked you these questions was that DYK is traditionally a very sleepy corner of Wikipedia, so with your emotional reaction to your suggestions being declined, I felt it necessary to ask you to reaffirm your commitment to the "gentleman's agreement". I was hoping that it was quite clear from the wording of my original comment that my original opposition was very conditional, and that I would withdraw it were you to clarify your commitment to the agreement, in much the same was as an FAC oppose, so it is unfortunate that your RfA has taken a major turn for the worse due to this. In any case, I am very sure that you are mistaken that Samir and ALoan have self-selected, especially as ALoan has only begun updating in the last fortnight, and as you make noted above, you have not been at DYK for a substantial amount of time. In any case, as my request for confirmation has been fulfilled, I have withdrawn my objection to your candidacy as I had implied and promised. I'm sorry for what has happened to your RfA. Regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin Coaching / Held request
editYes, I am still interested in receiving Admin coaching. Regards, └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 14:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
a piece of advice
editIts not from me, actually. Its from a very good editor, Ambuj Saxena. He offered me some advice on my last ER that really changed my perspective on communicating in tense situations. I pass this on to you:
As others have said above, you need to work on the time you take to react to situations. Often, as time goes by, we start seeing the situations differently; in a completely different perspective. From my experience, I can tell that in most cases (as much as I have seen), you tried to do the right thing, without giving a gestation period to your actions. Reacting too quickly is often seen as agression, and was the primary reason why your first RfA failed. I too, reacted too quickly to SV's edits, and as a result missed the fact that the FAC in question had already closed. The episode that followed is very well known to you. From what I see, you have the tell-tale signs of becoming a rouge admin, who tries to do the right thing without thinking of the consequences. But my experience tells that many people see it as a negative quality, and this may result in their opposition to your RfA. The trouble is that 100 cases of civility can't be cited to back you, and even if someone finds one hint of incivility against you, it would be used against you. As a completely independent, and equally important issue, I find that you haven't mentioned what kind of admin you are planning to be. Looking at your contributions, I found little janitorial work, and you may need to work on that too. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
(copied from Wikipedia:Editor review/Rama's Arrow 2) Rama's arrow 15:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editI'm ready, but Hoopy seemed to leave the coaching thing. He has been busy, and I can fly solo with no problems. I'm ready. :) Yanksox 22:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, no I'm around, it's just that you were doing such a good job, I couldn't really think of anything else to say! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 22:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
heheheheh, Hoopy you are great. I couldn't work with anyone else. :D Yanksox 22:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)*pretends to laugh along* Just as well, there's no one else to work with... Highway Grammar Enforcer! 22:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Yeaahhhhh...sorry, a tad bit tired here. That's for the new student. Yanksox 22:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)You probably misread my comments above. Though Yanksox certainly did much of the coaching, I acted as an assistant coach, so to speak, and am still very much interested in helping out program, so definitely go ahead and fix me up! Thanks a lot and cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 08:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Sure, I think we worked well last time (though he certainly was able to provide a bit more help than I with his extensive admin exerperience). Thanks again! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 08:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes, you can assign me to someone. :) NCurse work 07:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
UPA
editCan you please select your finalist a.s.a.p., at Wikipedia:Esperanza/User_Page_Award#Finalists. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 07:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Time to judge the finalists!
editHello, HighwayCello. This is a quick message to remind you that all 5 finalists for the Esperanza User Page Award have been chosen. You now need to judge those 5 pages, awarding each one 1-10 points for attractiveness, usefulness, interesting-ness, general niceness and quality of subpages. Refer to the Scores section at the project page if you are unsure of how to score.
Once you have scored the 5 pages, email Celestianpower using the specified format. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced. Thanks. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 08:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
your RfA
editHi HC, I've changed my !vote after thinking about your comments. Sorry about that, but what with the concerns raised by some users, I'd rather exercise caution. Just make sure you don't get too personally involved with articles as an administrator, if this RfA succeeds.
On another note, great work with admin coaching - it's really been revived all over again!
Take care, riana_dzasta 08:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA Questions
editHi again! Per your request, I'll leave questions here, which actually leads me to a question, hehe; why would you want users to bring RfA discussion to your talk page rather than keeping it in a centralised viewable location on the RfA page where users are encouraged to submit questions for optional response by the candidate? hoopydinkConas tá tú? 15:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sure thing, but I actually thought that the question was quite relevent, as you violated Wikipedia policy on the RfA itself (unknowingly, it seems) and actively removed content pertinent to your RfA and which users have commented on as part of their rationale. As such, the question was indeed appropriate by your own language; admin behaviour and views on policy. Also, your past actions are important as well, as one's actions largely define one's character and abilities. Furthermore, if you agree that this question is relevant to your RfA, I'd ask you to paste it onto the actual page or just drop me a line with your opinion and I'll paste it if you concur. Thanks for your quick response! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 15:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, I'm not sure I fully understand the reference, but I'll go ahead and paste it. Cheers hoopydinkConas tá tú?
- I've gone ahead and pasted it, but left out your last bit about the jedi thing... I'm assuming that was your response to me, not your answer, but feel free to do whatever you want with it ;) hoopydinkConas tá tú? 15:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, I'm not sure I fully understand the reference, but I'll go ahead and paste it. Cheers hoopydinkConas tá tú?
- No problem at all! First, RfA actually isn't a vote. It's a bit difficult for me to give you any specific points to work on. My issue is in regards to how you view adminship and Wikipedia, in general. I feel that in order for one to be trusted with extra responsibilities, one must have the best interests in the project at the forefront of one's mind, regardless of any personal biases. Also, I believe that one must never use the buttons to further one's own ambitions. Lastly, I feel that one needs a demeanour and approach that I don't think you possess. While I think it's great that each person approaches Wikipedia in his/her own different way, especially as it's a purely voluntary effort, I don't feel that your approach suits you for being an administrator. Sorry if this is a bit vauge, so feel free to follow up with more specifics, and I'd be happy to try to elaborate. As an aside, unrelated to RfA, I noticed that you crossed out my comments in regards to the admin coaching, but I haven't yet received any confirmation of new participation. Thanks hoopydinkConas tá tú? 03:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Charizard problems
editHello. It seems I'm a new arrival on a much-discussed topic, so I apologise if I've been a little slow in getting up to speed. It seems that there are difficulties arising from a difference of opinion about what constitutes "out-universe" wording. In the interests of furthering understanding, would it be possible to ask you to explain what you consider needs improving in the Characteristics section, and what is required in order for a section to be "out-universe"? Thank you for reading this. -- Grgcox 20:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I've irritated you with my edits to the Charizard page. You haven't yet replied to the comments I've made, but you have reverted the edits I've made almost immediately. Is this a sign that you don't welcome my attempts to contribute to this article? It's difficult to know what you think unless you tell me. -- Grgcox 12:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. There's no need to rush - please rest if you need to! -- Grgcox 13:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Threads on the Admin coaching page
editWhen I posted comments to everyone's posts on the admin coaching page, I contacted everyone of them with a note that said "you've got mail" and directed them to the admin coaching page. I've just received a message from one of them that he couldn't find my reply to his post there, and upon checking discovered that you have been removing entries as part of standard operating operating procedure. There's nothing wrong with that, except that I'm going to get a flood of emails from people wondering where their replies are. I've added a simple system to the Admin coaching page to accomodate the threads. I've restored all threads, using (assigned) to mark them. No need to move entries from the numerical list to any other section on the page, as new entries will naturally be posted as new headings at the bottom of the page. Simply mark entries (assigned) to keep track. This system should also make it easier to archive as well, because you won't need to move entries to another page every time you make an assignment. Simply archive the page the same way normal talk pages are archived when they become too long. I look forward to your reply. The Transhumanist 06:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
You have mail
editYou have a reply waiting for you at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching The Transhumanist 18:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry, I cleared it along with your request for coaching when I was updating. Highway Grammar Enforcer! 23:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
You said I got a message in Wikipedia:Esperanza/admin coaching. But I couldn't find my message. May I ask where it is? --¿¡Exir Kamalabadi!? 23:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- The thread got removed due to an administrative glitch. I've restored the thread. If it disappears again, please see the project coordinator. The Transhumanist 07:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
edit
|
|
|
Esperanza Admin coaching
editSorry for the delay bud I've been away on a bit of a holiday (still managed to find my way to a PC at times however!)
Re admin coaching, Ive been chatting with User:Riana dzasta for some time about it (last discussion with her can be seen here... so if okay may I "assign myself" to her?
Hopefully that's not queue jumping or anything? Plan to start on Wednesday... is that all okay?
Thanks for your patience too! Glen 06:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks mate. I believe my aspiring sysop-to-be has already moved us into the active. A partner
may beis a great idea, as a) Much as I believe I have all the answers Im well aware thats a bunch of the proverbial ass, and b) Im a coaching virgin so if there's a person available who perhaps has done it before may save a bit of the ol' trial and error (like weeks! :)
- How would I be best to coerce some poor soul into joining my happy throng? Thanks again Glen 09:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- If thats the case then please save yourself the bother. Riana is as close as an ideal pairing as anyone could ever have so it'll be smooth sailing just the two of us - thanks for the offer. And yes, just "!voted" in your RfA, so consider it a little less rocky now :) Good luck my friend - buzz me anytime if I can assist too. Glen 10:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
zOMG!
editIs that right... you've got an RfA active as I type??? Glen 10:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Per your coaching inquiry
editGetting sort of passive coaching lately, but I've got pretty austere coaches (of which I felt lucky to get, sort of like being assigned Thor and Aphrodite as coaches). I try not to bother them unless I get into serious stuff. I'm feeling good about where I am, but not enough controversy under my belt. Kinda quiet in the history cluster. No one's ever really given me direct feedback on my body of work, which I kinda would like. Is that an WP:ER? BusterD 13:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 6th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching / Virtual classroom
editOkay, I've got everything set up for my two students. I've been inviting some of the most prolific and talented editors of Wikipedia to participate, and some very useful advice has already been posted. The Virtual classroom has grown to a scale at which it can accomodate many more students, and many more coaches. Feel free to send as many of each there as you like, and you are most welcome to come join in too. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 16:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Good show
editHey Highway, let me be the first to congratulate you on a strong showing during your RfA. And yes, you still deserve congratulations, even though it didn't make it! Hope all is well, -- Natalya 23:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not be disappointed. You are highly valued around here. Personally, I think you're a true asset to the goals of the project. -- Samir धर्म 00:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey Highway, I'm so sorry to see that your RfA failed. I know that it doesn't mean much now, but you're a wonderful wikipedian, and a great person, and, as Samir says, you are highly valued. As I say, I know it doesn't mean much now, but it's true. Keep strong. Thε Halo Θ 00:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Actually, you were only about 10 votes away. That is, if 10 "oppose votes" had voted "support" instead, the tally would have been 60/20 which would have met the requisite 75%. Given that at least 10 votes focused on the tone of your RFA comments, I think that you are very close. I would discount the suggestion of waiting 9 months. I almost think it was deliberately put out there as bait to see if it would trigger a negative reaction from you. Unfortunately, it did. I think another RFA in 3 months would likely succeed. Continue being civil and argue more circumspectly in your next RFA. I would have switched my vote on this one if it would have changed the outcome but it became evident that it wouldn't so I left it as "oppose". I look forward to supporting you in your next RFA. --Richard 01:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's too bad you didn't get adminship. I know you will if you stick with it.--Ac1983fan(yell at me) 01:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Augh, man, I was sure you'd get it this time. :( Well, on Sunday, I'll paste a joke involving you and other Wikipedians on my user page to try and lighten up your day. Hope you enjoy. Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 00:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey Highway, I'm so sorry to see that your RfA failed. I know that it doesn't mean much now, but you're a wonderful wikipedian, and a great person, and, as Samir says, you are highly valued. As I say, I know it doesn't mean much now, but it's true. Keep strong. Thε Halo Θ 00:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Survey Q
editHave you ever been to the southern hemisphere? respond here Deadline is December 15th. AstroBoy 02:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
editHello HighwayCello, very thanks for supporting my successful RfA. I am very thankful to you for co-ordination in my admin coaching. I would say, please do not get disappointted with your previous RfA. But I would still congratulate you for showing great enthusiasm in your RfA. Thanks again, Shyam (T/C) 06:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editI am sorry, but I am very busy right now. Is it at all possible for there to be coaching during the Holidays (i.e. end of December, early January)? ~ clearthought 21:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
Again, the issue of the month is inline citations. A Day in the Life, A Hard Day's Night (song), and Get Back have all been defeatured, as they failed to satisfy criterion 1(c) of What is a featured article?, and other song FAs are due for the chopping block. Inline citations are an important aspect of articles—they ensure verifiability and reliability, and they remove original research. Additionally, they give readers the option to read the original source material and view it within context. Basically:
|
Wherever possible, editors should help to trim down on list-like prose within Beatles articles. They should convert list-like sections into fluent, cohesive prose which ties an article's sections together. Lists make articles disjointed, awkward, and difficult to read. Be sure to take part in the Featured Article drive, and don't forget those inline citations! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 008 – December 2006). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Signpost updated for November 13th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 20th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
LIVE IRC CHARTER DEBATE
editThere are many proposals to change the charter floating around Esperanza right now. Let's talk about all of them in an Esperanza IRC charter "debate". I believe a good time would be exactly one week from today. In US Eastern Time, 5:30pm, next week, on Friday. What do you think? WikieZach| talk 04:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 27th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Interview for Wikipedia Weekly?
editHi!
You may or may not be aware of the Wikipedia Weekly podcast, which is now approaching its eighth weekly episode, on which I'm a regular presenter. This episode, we'd like to cover the Esperanza dispute now that the dust has had time to settle, and would very much like for you to come on the show to talk to us about it. We'll also be inviting a few other representatives of Esperanza, and User:Robth to provide an opposing view.
All that would be required are a microphone, a reasonably fast internet connection, and a free copy of Skype. We'll likely be recording at around 1500 UTC on Saturday, although feel free to suggest an alternative time if this wouldn't suit you. You can also join us in #wikipediaweekly on FreeNode prior to the podcast. Thanks for your time, and I hope you can join us on the weekend. :) Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 00:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 4th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editHi HighwayCello. You're on wikibreak, but I thought I'd ask before doing anything major with the admin coaching page. I'm trying to figure out who still needs a coach. I hope you're having a good break. --Fang Aili talk 16:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I decided to take over management temporarily. If you'd like the job back at any time, let me know. I'm just trying to keep the project running. Thanks. --Fang Aili talk 16:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
Wikipedia's standards are improving all the time, with the result that many articles in The Beatles Wikiproject are being nominated for review of their FA and GA status - and many are losing that accolade. It is difficult, with such a large number of articles and the ease with which editors may make changes which are detrimental, to maintain the standard of articles, let alone improve them. As ever, members efforts are both appreciated and needed to keep the Project on course.
|
If one is to be mercenary about the subject, it should be noted that Paul McCartney is going to be more noteworthy than usual in the near future as his divorce case comes to court. In that case it is great to note that a small group of Project Members (plus another individual who does not feel compelled to register himself despite important contributions) have worked very hard, and in an atmosphere of good humour, to take the McCartney piece to a succesful Good Article nomination. Perhaps this is the method to use for future articles, a small dedicated team concentrating on one subject at a time. Of course, all members are invited to join any existing group or even go about forming their own. Please note any such action in the Project Log. If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 009 – January 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Signpost updated for December 11th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Just a heads up
edit... for past favors. Some informed opinion/votes needed. Let me know if I should vote to keep. Best regards and happy holidays. // FrankB 16:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 18th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar trophy
editfor your work on Pokemon and other Nintendo related topics.
Feel free to add it to your award page (or what have you) --HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 03:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you do me a favor
editHello, I know that we have never met before, but I need to ask you a favor. I'm the logged out form of User:The Hybrid. I was trying to get myself some new vandal fighting tools, but I messed up. My skin got messed up, and my internet froze. I can't log back in. I noticed that you are currently in, so could you go to User:The Hybrid/monobook.js and blank the page for me please? It freezes when I go there to. If you do, I'll add every single Pokémon creature article as well as the video games to my watchlist and keep them vandalism free. After you're done, let me know on my IP talk page please. Cheers, 71.223.40.167 08:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- I can do that, if it still needs to be done.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 08:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Or not, it seems to be locked.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 08:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm back, so nevermind. Cheers, -- THL 09:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on Torchic being THE Featured Article of the Day for 23 December 2006! I knew it would get there eventually, but I didn't expect it to be featured on the Main Page so quickly. Let us hope that this will be the beginning of a bright future for Pokémon next year, and, to a somewhat smaller extent, the Pokémon Collaborative Project. Once again, congratulations! As a frequent editor of the article, you, as well as every other Wikipedian who has done good to the article, have certainly earned this recognition (and something I doubt any Descent (computer game) article would get). -- Altiris Exeunt 02:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Torchic
editcongrats on finally getting it up to snuff! I assumed you were the one who had been working on it the most because of the last FAC you tried for. I was checking some of your refs (the Hasbro recall was interesting) and you make an analytical claim about them in the real world, noting their aesthetic appeal, but the claims are reffed with serebii epiguides.
- Like major Fire-types before it, such as Charmander,[47] Torchic's popularity is partially due to its aesthetic appeal. Torchic have been promoted in this way in the Pokémon anime, where characters have shown a liking towards it because of its attractiveness.[30][48]
This is in the "other media" section, first paragraph. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for help
editI noticed that you were instrumental in bringing a recent article to FA status. I have been trying to get the Ohio Wesleyan University article to FA status. One of the critical areas for the article that remains an issue is copyediting and prose. I was wondering if you might be willing to help me in this area? I'd greatly appreciate it! Thank you. WikiprojectOWU 22:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Coaching
editHi Highway. Thanks so much for your response (Nov 2, 2006) to my coaching request. You may have already seen that I'm not currently very active (maybe two edits in three months). I'm certainly still interested in coaching. And I wonder if that can happen at a slow pace, since I won't have much time until May('ish). I don't want to waste resources or for anyone to feel slighted if I'm not responding quickly enough. What do you think? ~ Deebkie 22:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Pokestart deletion
editMay I draw your attention to Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 28#Template:Pokestart? As you've been justifying it's existence in the PCP for ages now, you might as well try doing so in this AfD. Cheers, The Raven's Apprentice (Talk|Contribs) 07:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
editSignpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
|
The question of capitalising of the letter "t" in The of The Beatles has been raised again. It appears that UK style references (here and here) also maintains that the letter should be in lower case. If the Project is to be appear professional then it may have to change the format. Polite discussion is invited at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Policy. If possible, please provide sources/references to support your position.
It has been a fairly quiet time with regard to the Project (or at least that is how it seems). If you are reading this and wondering why your efforts in respect of a Beatles article has not been mentioned, it may be that you haven't told any editor. This is your Newsletter, which means you can contribute to it, so please do! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 010 – January/February 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least three weeks. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the spamlist, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ralbot 08:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 10, February 2007
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
I look from the wings at the play you are staging While my guitar gently weeps As I'm sitting here doing nothing but aging Still my guitar gently weeps On the reverse of the page appears the lyrics to Hey Jude in the hand of Mal Evans.
|
Hottest issue or concern for this month is the perennial matter of Project articles losing their Good or Featured Article status. The main Project page now includes a status board that gives the current ratings of some of the more important articles. Let's make sure the core articles (The Beatles, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr) reach or retain Good Article status, if not Featured Article. If you are aware of another major article whose status is at risk, add it to the board.
Since there has been no response in the matter of the use of lowercase for the initial letter of the when applied with Beatles from the opponents, it is likely that the case for using lowercase only will be adopted as Project policy by default. User:LessHeard vanU will draw up a recommendation and submit it to the Policy talkpage in a few days.
We are pleased to welcome the contributions of Alexcalamaro to this newsletter. Any editor can include an item of interest or news; this medium can be an excellent tool for getting a comment seen by a great number of project members. As it says below, this is your newsletter. If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!
Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 011 – March 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 03:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Pokeballicon.gif
editHello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I notice that you have two user subpages which use Image:Pokeballicon.gif:
Pokeballicon.gif is now obsolete and it is recommended that Image:Poké Ball icon.svg be used instead. So, I'm wondering: what is the purpose of those two pages? Are they kept for historical interest, or are they personal sandboxes, or what? Please let me know so that I know if it's appropriate to change the instances of Pokeballicon.gif on these pages to the SVG version. —Remember the dot (t) 06:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
Wow. You've made a crazy amount of edits and you're I see you everywhere on pokemon. I hereby present you a Working Man's Barnstar! Llama! 16:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC) |
Awards!
editYou have so many! How does one go about earning one? Or a few? --Floramage! 17:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Dilexia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Theunicyclegirl 17:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Torchic FAR
editTorchic has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Bringing up an earlier statement
edit"If you need any help with articles, just leave me a message." How about with Kirby's Dream Land? :P - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 11, March 2007
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
|
See below. There is genuine concern that the Newsletter is getting stale in terms of content and variety, and that the same individuals are featured each month. Furthermore, lack of "news" is hindering the timely distribution as the editors wait for something to report. All Project editors are encouraged to give their news, suggestions and thoughts to keep the 'Letter vital and interesting. If making direct contributions do not appeal, please give a mention on the Newsletter talkpage and it will be incorporated!
Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. The present incumbent is finding it difficult to reflect the breadth of the Project, focusing on much the same individuals and articles each month, and has decided to beg for contributions from other individuals. Interested persons need only start working on next months issue to qualify. It really is that simple! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 012 – April 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 00:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Revived discussion concerning fair use in portals
editI am contacting everyone who participated in the discussion that became inactive in December. Due to the length of the previous discussion, I have proposed a new amendment and you like you to weigh in so that we may actually have a consensus on this matter as it doesn't seem there exists one either way. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria
Hi!,
I just realised that you review the articles for GA status, regarding music topics, and am wondering what you think of the article concerned. I hope to bring it up to GA status and go from there :-).
If there are any problems, could you if possible please list them?.
Cheers!
no
editdo not ever do [[Media: ]] things like that #REDIRECT [[
again with the colors]]
News Time
edit
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||
|
This has been a tumultuous month for the project yet again. We need your input on how the project should work and what it's role should be. And we need to start getting Featured Articles, folks! :)
This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 013 – May 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. Your assistance is welcome. If you would prefer to just edit - and why wouldn't you? - we have a choice selection of red links to turn blue and articles to clean! Now let's get busy.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log. |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
BetacommandBot 23:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
editPolitics rule 22:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Extranet is now E talk 01:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mewtwomelee.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Mewtwomelee.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive
editA new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.
You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 23:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pokémon in other media
editPokémon in other media, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pokémon in other media satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon in other media and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pokémon in other media during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee (Talk) 03:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Judgement day.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Judgement day.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sunkern anime.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Sunkern anime.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Torchic GBA.jpg)
editThanks for uploading Image:Torchic GBA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Torchicanime.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Torchicanime.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Clefairy2.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Clefairy2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Charizard
editPer WikiRage.com, the article Charizard received heavy editing today by unregistered users and may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 06:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello there, friend
editHello friend! I know you haven't been around in almost a year, but on the off-chance that you ever even decide to look at your user page, I thought I'd say hi, and that I hope all is going well. -- Natalya 21:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Where ya been, buddy? Even my sluggish five-edits-per-week-at-most is surpassing you! I know the Pokémon sections of Wikipedia are yearning a good beat-down my your mighty editing prowess! You're not missing much on T:SSBB, though; it's pretty much screenshot this and reference that and two-day hyper debate over here and stagnant article there. Hope to see ya again!--The Ninth Bright Shiner 18:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Awesome
editI have to say that this edit gave me a laugh. :-) Ta bu shi da yu 14:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Preity Zinta
editHi. Could you do me favour and quickly read the Preity Zinta article and participate at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Preity Zinta when you have a moment. Your words would be much appreciated cheers. I'm looking to get this to a FA asap thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
editThe November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Kirby powers
editList of Kirby powers, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of Kirby powers satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kirby powers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Kirby powers during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles
editYour user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
editThe December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
First Edit
editOrphaned non-free media (Image:Pachirisu.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Pachirisu.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No content in Category:Baby Pokémon
editHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Baby Pokémon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Baby Pokémon has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Baby Pokémon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April GA Newsletter
editThe April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
editThe May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Happy birthday fellow Wikipedian!
editBest wishes from Canada ;-) ---RobNS 01:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good articles newsletter
editThe Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered manually because your talk page is too long for the bot. ;-) giggy (:O) 01:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:User WikiProject Nintendo
editTemplate:User WikiProject Nintendo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MuZemike (talk) 17:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Strawberry Panic! GAR
editStrawberry Panic! has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
editGA Sweeps invitation
editHello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Poke Picture
editTemplate:Poke Picture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ost (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
editWikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April. |
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Happy first edit day!
editHappy Birthday!
editBisasam listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bisasam. Since you had some involvement with the Bisasam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NFS
editTemplate:NFS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 2
editA tag has been placed on Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 17:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 3
editA tag has been placed on Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Croconaw screen.png
editThanks for uploading File:Croconaw screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Croconaw screen.png
editThanks for uploading or contributing to File:Croconaw screen.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Feinoha Talk 00:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Pokeanime
editTemplate:Pokeanime has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Electric mouse listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric mouse. Since you had some involvement with the Electric mouse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:HOL listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:HOL. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:HOL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. InvalidOS (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
"Running gags in the Pokémon anime" listed at Redirects for discussion
editA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Running gags in the Pokémon anime. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 27#Running gags in the Pokémon anime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Writer's Barnstar | |
nice work on pokémon - CrayonArt45 (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:List of Kirby powers
editHello, HighwayCello. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Kirby powers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of Kirby powers
editHello, HighwayCello. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Kirby powers".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:28, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:HighwayCello/Minun
editUser:HighwayCello/Minun, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HighwayCello/Minun and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:HighwayCello/Minun during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zerbu 💬 21:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)