User talk:Erachima

This user is working himself to death at college, and probably won't be editing actively, except maybe on breaks, for the foreseeable future.

Talk Page Archives
01 Perm. link 01	11 Perm. link 11
02 Perm. link 02	12 Perm. link 12
03 Perm. link 03	13 Perm. link 13
04 Perm. link 04	14 Perm. link 14
05 Perm. link 05	15 Perm. link 15
06 Perm. link 06	16 Perm. link 16
07 Perm. link 07
08 Perm. link 08
09 Perm. link 09
10 Perm. link 10

This page is archived every 25 topics, by the removal of the oldest 25 topics.

I see you closed the GA review on Eglinton Tournament of 1839. It was appropriate for the review to close, since it had been on hold for a week, and it was still some way off. However, I feel that, as the initial reviewer, it was my place to close the review and offer explanations (which I intended to do after the weekend). I invested time in the review, and built up some rapport with the lead editors, through discussion and user talk pages, and feel it only fair that I should be the one to conclude matters. For the editors involved, such an approach would offer less discouragement, especially if they felt they had reached some understanding with me. I understand your concerns about the backlog of "on holds", but wish you had approached me first. That said, I don't hold a grudge, and am not greatly offended! I will, however, bring the matter up at the GAN talk page, to see what consensus is: it might be I've over-reacted to what is standard practice! Gwinva (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. No toes broken... I've commented at the review page and user talk pages as I intended, so all sorted. Sorry if I sounded snotty. Gwinva (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is about the article you reviewed August 27th (that was a long long time ago I know). Anyway, um, you mentioned that the article needed the Japanese release dates. I have searched for them, but haven't found any. Would the Japanese release dates be on Amazon? (Also I followed your advice about the Production/Media sections. If you could look at Planet Ladder and see if anything else still needs to be changed or added, that would be nice.) Thank you. Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you did the first GA review for Firestar's quest and I have fix all the problems. Can you review it again? Gears of War 2 04:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch ;) Oh, and a quick question. I remember that you used this website as a source for some episode lists in the past and I used it for a good chunk of my FLs. Could you comment on its reliability, as it was a frequent discussion at WT:ANIME. If it's associated with some company or some official database, it'd be a great help sourcing-wise for a lot of lists. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 08:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have been asked to clarify your statement in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Afghanpolicy27. Thank you in advance! Kotiwalo (talk) 14:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed your comment regarding your personal archives at WP:Village pump (policy)#Does talk page archiving violate CC-BY-SA. You may be interested in {{talkarchivehist}}, which incorporates a few permanent links into the standard archive header. It looks like you create your archives in single edits rather than incrementally, so it should be compatible. If you're interested, I could apply it to one of your archives as an example. Flatscan (talk) 05:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you seem to know how articles work. you tihnk you may help me remove trivial information?Bread Ninja (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder on that one. . . I think I set the precedence of spelling it disambiguaion on the talk page. Sorry about that. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 23:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator and I have been staying at Wikimania together for the last week, hence the lack of action on his part :). He's informed me IRL that he has a few more tweaks to make before he's satisfied, so I'm going to give him a bit more time on it, since he's on holiday for most of this week as well. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fair enough. Conference was excellent - particularly the bit when after getting a round of applause for a question I asked, I was dragged out of the audience by a moderate and plonked in the panel for a talk. Ironholds (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article. I have made some replies at the review, so please review them again at your convenience. Arsonal (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gosox5555#Joseph Smith, Jr. GAN ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎

I upset him. HalfShadow 23:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I understand the reasons you provided for GAN failure had previously been resolved, so could you please reconsider your position, or provide new/different feedback/suggestions that can be resolved? It would be greatly appreciated, since I am not sure what you would reccomend fixing in order to bring the article up to GAN. I guess I am unsure why it is not a GA as it is right now. --GabeMc (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think her most recent comment is pretty much 100% sarcasm; she doesn't really want suggestions as far as I can tell. -kotra (talk) 09:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on the talk page. patsw (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, it looked like harmless/good-faith edit by the user. I will be more careful in the future. Thanks for letting me know -- GateKeeper ^(talk) @ 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this article; I think I've fixed the points you brought up. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several months and a draft ahead of you: User:Masem/draft though it needs trimming and editing, please feel free to do so. --MASEM (t) 14:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once it's final and I've posted it and notified Gavin, it would need to have 2 additional editors affirm they have tried resolution to allow the case forward. --MASEM (t) 17:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that closing the discussion[1] is in any way good ettiquette. Do you wish to discuss this matter over at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts? --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 15:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts that I intend to reopen the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles, but I will pause and give you time to respond. I am open to suggestion as to how the discussion can be modified if you feel that the thread is too long, but if you feel that the proposal has "failed", then I believe you should express your thoughts as to why this is the case, as they will be most welcome. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 10:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I have made a proposal at Wikiquette alerts that I intend reopeing the discusions at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles after starting a thread at WP:Village pump/Policy about the issue revealed in the discussion "Example: Jan Smuts in the Boer War" about segmented article titles and their interaction with WP:UNDUE. If you would like to participate in the thread, let me know. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I have opened a thread at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Alternative_article_names to see if there will be any response to the issues raised.--Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 13:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting a halt to the ongoing discussion. It was still interesting BUT was chewing up my watchlist and my time in reviewing the remarks! Somebody had to do it! Student7 (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see my comment here. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, do as you wish.

Let agrees that we disagree.

Note that i advise you to read some animanga FA/GA like School Rumble for what contents belongs to what section because to put it bluntly current contents of the production section have nothing to do with that section.

I do help especially but i won't force my point in any issue so you can disregard my piece of advise. --KrebMarkt (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Going farther than showing "my concern" over Highschool of the Dead would require a higher level of involvement from me. This is something, i don't want to because i have no particular interest for the subject. I leave it to the good or bad hands of the editors with affinity to that subject. --KrebMarkt (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first off, thank you for the wonderful greeting. As a new user, it's very nice to get an actual message instead of "Reverted." So, I noticed that the old image was still up and figured I would change it to the one used on the Bleach Wiki, which I personally thought was better because it showed Aizen for who he was and was therefore more accurate. As we both now know, this backfired instantly, so let's discuss it. You mentioned that it is customary to use images of characters as they appeared but I think this might be an exception because Aizen as he appeared was just an act/illusion (in most anime/manga this is not the case). The only problem my image would cause is that it does spoil the story quite a bit (My intention was not spoil such an awesome conspiracy to new Bleach fans). But the tags are annoying to add. How do I tag the image (and find the tags)? Again, it is from the Bleach wiki, but it doesn't seem to say who owns it, or I can't find the information. Any help is appreciated. Arawn 15:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arawn V (talk • contribs)

Just to let you know, the issues at Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom and AN/I have all been worked out now. Thank you for your patience. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erachima,

I don't mean to bother you, but do you plan to return to Wikipedia? You started a GA review of Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom over a month ago, but didn't make any comments on it, and haven't edited since then, so I'm kind of in limbo. Thanks, Jayjg ^(talk) 06:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award
	I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) —Farix (t | c) 03:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you participated in a deletion request at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Wikipe-tan lolicon (2007-01-04). The same files are now being considered for undeletion at commons:Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:LoliWikipetan.jpg. If you're still around we'd appreciate your opinion and feedback. Thanks! Dcoetzee 23:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Highschool of the Dead, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 14:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for taking notice. By the looks of it, that is a rogue IP used by one experienced blocked/banned user (I could guess who it is, but I don't want to give him the time of day), who known I watchlisted the page and trying to get my attention in the most pathetic way. I think he is gaming the system by posting an insanely crude and inane message then and now (for instance, this one), waiting for the IP to go stale (or changing it), then coming up with tiny reposts to let us know he's still around. If I guessed right about the identity of the user, so I tend to look at this, and then overlook it, in the light of that fact. Dahn (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Various postings by block-evading IP user removed. – Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 23:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my stubbornness. I hope we can get along as friends from now on.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 01:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to revert your removal of NWA.Rep's joke banner from his talkpage, as I have already reverted the same edit by Bartsa. But I'm really sorry to see that you think it necessary to kick a guy who is so completely down. The joke isn't that funny, but it's not disruptive by any definition. Removing such harmless things from userpages, which users traditionally have wide latitude to manage themselves, raises the temperature and the mutual hostility in the community, and that is in the long run far more hurtful to the encyclopedia than a silly joke or two (this one wastes editors' time to the tune of what, three seconds?). And no, he can't "fight his own battles", as he has scrambled his password. His one point of pride right now is to retain the banner, which has been there for a long time. I confess I don't think it an important thing in itself, but I can understand how somebody can get very upset about the deletion of his userpage, and try to retain at least this last trace of his personal choice on Wikipedia. Please see the discussion on my talkpage.[2] Bishonen | talk 22:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Anime and manga by demographic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations. Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Despite having no prior interactions, you have made a string of personal attacks and you assume bad faith. Please stop that realize that I am not alone in my disagreement with MOSAM. And note that I didn't even start the discussion or go to the policy fact itself. I have worked tirelessly to improve A&M topics and I've got many articles to GA levels in the last month alone. Your characterization of me as malicious and with a "vendetta" is very rude and I ask you retract your statements and assume good faith. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off my page. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant diff. Also, talk pages are for public communication with editors. So, in short, no, not if there's something that needs to be discussed with you. --erachima talk 15:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You've already been warned. This is your final warning. Stop making personal attacks on me. I don't even know you! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I maintain that I have not personally attacked you, and you are simply abusing the warning process to try to scare people you don't like into shutting up. --erachima talk 21:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree, good work. Thx. 88.104.27.75 (talk) 03:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot revert out pages like that, especially during a discussion. Multiple editor OWN and localconsensus does not make your actions correct. Revert your removal and let the process continue. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal attack has been removed. Casting aspersions is a violation of NPA. Even your final statement is inaccurate because of CWW and condescending. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your concerns (and misconceptions). --Niemti (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bleach (anime) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleach (anime) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a personal attack and clearly inappropriate. I have reverted it. Your preceding comment isn't much better. You may want to redact parts of that yourself. I fully understand that there are longstanding disagreements with ChrisGualtieri about various anime- and manga-related articles, but personal attacks of this type only poison the well and do not help at all, least of all yourself. Huon (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I, obviously, disagree that it was unwarranted or I wouldn't have said it. The division between a standard disagreement and a WP:TEND case is that it's the editor, not just the editing, that has become the problem. --erachima talk 04:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop baiting and making more bad faith and/or insulting remarks at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Anime-_and_manga-related_articles#Refocusing_discussion. You were warned about your comments and I find your incivil comments to be disruptive. It serves only to foster more problems. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove your post where you twist my words and reinsert it under the false guise of "vandalism".[3] I removed my own post because you were likely to make it into NPA when I am tired of these trolls. WP:DENY all trolls is best. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing/responding to your posts anymore. Have someone message me when you need to interact with me. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that this sort of thing is at all helpful, especially as the user in question is blocked and can't say anything in protest. I'd also suggest that it's probably fairly impolite to modify another's signature, even with a (presumably intended to be) humorous edit summery, and quite likely to be outside policy too. Perhaps you'd like to go back and revert yourself? Thank you, Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 08:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy message I name dropped you.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I ask then ? Thanks, Sir Lothar (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for answer, Sir Lothar (talk) 08:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you participated in the above AFD, as per the close I have opened up a proper merge discussion at Talk:Dragon Ball and you are welcome to participate.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bleach (anime) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleach (anime) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryulong (琉竜) 16:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shinigami in Bleach, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate if you can add those issues for this article and Fix the problem.(Academiava User:Ramya20 is representing murder side and remove valuable issues on this article.--Academiava (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alwis, who was 42, was dragged from his house and murdered on the night of July 31, 1989. The murder has been blamed on the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna^[1],but nirmala de Alwis is proved wrote a book murder was handled by Hudson Samarasinghe..^[2][3]

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		For defending the right of Wikipedia to fight censorship within its policies, customs and respect for BLP subjects. Keep your voice up! cyclopiaspeak! 00:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. --erachima talk 13:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]