User talk:Axem Titanium

Archives

Archive 1 (May 2006 - Oct 2006) Archive 2 (Oct 2006 - Dec 2006) Archive 3 (Dec 2006 - Mar 2007) Archive 4 (Apr 2007 - Jul 2007) Archive 5 (Aug 2007 - Dec 2007) Archive 6 (Jan 2008 - May 2009) Archive 7 (Jun 2009 - Apr 2010) Archive 8 (May 2010 - Aug 2010) Archive 9 (Sep 2010 - Oct 2011) Archive 10 (Jan 2012 - Aug 2012) Archive 11 (Oct 2012 - Jul 2013) Archive 12 (Nov 2013 - Nov 2015) Archive 13 (Dec 2015 - Apr 2016) Archive 14 (May 2016 - Nov 2019) Archive 15 (Feb 2020 - Jul 2020)

Nice work making this conomination duo. The two .hack gaming series is GA. I have no knowledge of Link so I doubt I can help there. Also, if you are interested Kite and Haseo's articles have just been copyedited if you are interested in working on them. Also, I've just rememberd a Hack GU image of the 8 main characters unlocked after beating Redemption in case it might fit better. Anyway, nice work.Tintor2 (talk) 21:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work yourself! I'll take a gander at the character articles when I have a chance but I'm not able to put too much work into them right now. They're looking very solid already though. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not notifying you sooner; I have remedied and copied the code for the templates, so the LoL roster navbox template and category pages can now be nominated for deletion without opposition or concern from me. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 22:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 15:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— 16:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo I thought this was a Charizard card - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Hello Axem! I'm conducting a feature for the video games newsletter similar to that of a survey. I'm going to ask users their opinions on a specific matter and highlight unique and common answers to determine consensus on a subject. Your input would be very valuable, alongside others, to help answer this question.

The question is: How do you determine what makes a video game character notable enough for their own page? Do you follow pre-existing guidelines or have your own opinions on the matter?

Panini^🥪 10:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the discussion here regarding Flynn. In the meantime, do not re-add the material without better sourcing. Siliconera makes no mention of the allegations, and you're going to have an uphill battle convincing anyone that "Wowhead" meets our WP:RS criteria. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you say that. Wowhead has been a trusted source for World of Warcraft news for over a decade. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case, but it's not a trusted source for misconduct allegations. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm planning to nominate Judgment (video game) once it is copyedited but I don't know if it needs other type of fixes or info since I barely work in such big articles. Could you give it a look? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tintor. I'd be happy to take a look and give feedback, though I'll skip the plot section since I haven't played it. I'll try to get to it today or tomorrow. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tintor2 I finished my copyedit by the way. I think it's in good shape, no glaring issues jump out at me. Anything else that needs fixing should come out in the nomination process. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot the revision. The article was quite huge.Tintor2 (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Judgment became GA. Thanks for the help.Tintor2 (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Axem Titanium (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm conducting another survey for the Wikiproject Video games Newsletter. If you could leave your thoughts on the matter it would be greatly appreciated. Every response will be compiled into a MOS-Esque answer that balances the thoughts of our top contributors. You're one of them! The question is as follows:

What would you consider the requirements of making a video game series article? What about franchise articles?

If you would like to respond, please ping me here and write your reply. I'll handle the rest. Thanks in advance, Panini!^🥪 14:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Panini!: I don't treat "series" and "franchise" articles differently from each other. Primarily I look for coverage of the series as a series rather than a collection of individual titles. Development info is a must and influence/legacy goes a long way to convincing me a series page is warranted. I don't have a particular minimum cutoff for number of entries but it's certainly greater than two. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this becomes GA, and the next article isn’t released yet, would that make a Final Fantasy XIV good topic? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The next article is already "released". Axem Titanium (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

…but it’s not November 2021 yet… Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maintaining the FFXIV articles takes a lot of time and I don't know that I'd be able to get Endwalker to GA in a reasonable timeframe to prevent a good topic from relapsing. If it happens, it happens. It's not something I'm planning to do under a deadline. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok gotcha. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edits on a redirect (River City, Iowa) because I added a category to it and usually redirects do not have categories. However this is not true as I found plenty of people who are redirects in categories of births by year. how come? 26zhangi (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:26zhangi The purpose of categories is to aid in navigation between articles. Redirects, not being articles, do not generally need categories because they are not covered in detail in the target article. (See WP:RCAT for more detail on this editing guideline and WP:CAT for a more general look.) There is a small (unreferenced) section in The Music Man about River City but it's not the main focus of the article and Category:Fictional cities and towns in Iowa is too small and specific to have enough members to warrant its existence (see WP:SMALLCAT). This gets to the point of categorization on Wikipedia. What is the purpose of categorization? It's to aid in navigating between articles and to describe defining characteristics of article subjects. If there are few or no other members of a category, it doesn't accomplish either of these goals. Does that make sense? Axem Titanium (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HI. Just a heads up that I removed the CSD tag from Steve Gaynor as I think it is quite well sourced. For example, there is this in-depth profile. A couple new sources, published since the date of last AfD, have also been added. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 06:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Possibly: I'm not sure he passes WP:NPOL. His claim to "fame" is that he *lost* a SecState election in Arizona and that he announced a governor run? He's not even a politician yet, by that measure, so he'd have to pass GNG as a businessperson, which the article does not cover at all. A lot of the sources read like routine background coverage of political candidates. Running for election does not make one inherently notable. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ff8-edea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Titanium, I noticed your opinion posted on the discussion regarding the Esports page Dexerto's credibility a while back, could you kindly assess the credibility and reliability of a few Esports articles pages, I feel you understand the credibility best and will be able to give a proper opinion. The pages are Win.GG, Esportmaniacos (in Spanish) and Esports.net. Also there is an ongoing AFD, that I have proposed regarding Kkatamina and the article pages I had mentioned above, have been referenced in the article, if you could provide an opinion on the subject's notability as of now and the page, it would be great for the discussion. thanks again! Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 20:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've saw your reverse of my edits on the FFXIV pages specially the sections. I want so you an article on plot to explain why I made those edits, so you can understand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_(narrative) ExplorerX19 (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ExplorerX19: "Plot" and "Story" are largely synonymous in common parlance, even according to the wikipedia article you linked. The reason Plot is used as the header instead of Story is a convention recommended by WP:MOSVG and is repeated across thousands of video game articles. If you would like to argue for a change to this default convention, bring it up at WT:MOSVG. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no shit, Anton, at least I don't stan a fictional dung beetle while simultaneously dragging a stick across a glorified ukulele and calling it "music" and maybe re-(re)-read WP:SIGCOV before you go shooting your mouth off next time, huh? Americanfreedom (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is you who should reconsider before "shooting one's mouth off", so to speak. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the AfD conversation, I'm starting a userspace draft here for Guido Henkel to try and fix stuff. Man, the article really is in rough shape and you were right about nuking and starting over here. I'm basically cutting out extraneous detail and rewriting what's already there, but with all of the sources being in German, this is going to be nightmarish. Feel free to hop in if you find yourself with some extra time (no big either way!), I feel like I'm going down an Amico shaped rabbithole and would love to jump in with friends instead of alone, if that makes sense. Nomader (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing this. Looks like you already pushed the changes to the live article. I don't have a huge amount of time to edit these days but I'll poke around where I can. The Amico situation is unenviable and thank you for your efforts to tackle it. The whole thing is a big yikes from me. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gerda Arendt Wow has it really been that long already? :) Axem Titanium (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Endwalker characters.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axem Titanium

Thank you for creating Labour organizing.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Marlboro (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Marlboro (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article of Tifa is going through a Gar and I tried rewriting the reception to improve it. Could you revise it if possible? Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 01:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Yeah, I'll take a look when I get the chance. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bayesian Wikipedians has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ReneeWrites (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I hope you have a merry Christmas and a happy new year! ReneeWrites (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the well wishes! I appreciate your contributions to the project. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Shooterwalker (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying tone down the repetitive reception sections of Squall Leonhart and Tidus while expanding on the creation to avoid a similar reassessment that Tifa had. I think the reception sections covers most of the two character's better know aspects by the media. Still, I couldn't find too much about Squall's Kingdom Hearts design (which is kinda obvious when comparing it to Amano's artwork) even though it is used a lot not only there but also Dissidia. Feel free to give it a look. I asked Protodrake about the Japanese actor who voiced Squall but he also couldn't find anything about it. Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give them a look when I have some time over the next few days. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you find any source for at least expanding an analysis section add it to further reading. It helped a lot to balance Cloud's article (and I added some free images related to the subject). I also added a Roman king too to Noctis' article based on Tabata's commentary and the reception.Tintor2 (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Been pretty busy these few weeks so I'm not sure when I'll get to them. 🤞 Axem Titanium (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at articles from other sources or videos from popular anime tubers about this issue, you can easily see screenshots of several VAs directly referring to their interpretation of the character as a "Middle Eastern queer character" with a hint that they had to choose the right actress for the sake of "unique and rare representations". It's not essential, but it was clearly one of the complaints about diversity in casting. Also, I added "it seems", because apart from the Semitic name and dark skin color (and only the father, her mother clearly has European or Japanese roots), the ethnicity of the character is not actually discussed anywhere, and she can just as well be just tanned. Of course, only if you are not going to deny that Arabs or Jews are white. And again, this is all without regard to whether ethnic roots still play any role in the world of G-Witch, given the clearly fictitious names and fantastic setting. Solaire the knight (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it failed verification in the source, nothing more. "Seems to be implied" is a bit redundant in English and doesn't necessarily flow well. "Seems" and "implied" have overlapping meanings. Better to pick one or the other. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? In my language, "implies" refers to something that subtly refers to something, so I used to be unhappy when "implies" was stated without "it seems". Anyway, I added this because in the sources I wrote about it, several VAs referred to the rarity of such a representation. But since the specified source does not make any emphasis on this, it really does not matter. I'm not going to fight an edit war for a small piece of text that doesn't affect the overall text, so I've only returned "it seems" as still important to me. So, in English, "means" still has the character of uncertainty? Solaire the knight (talk) 07:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both "seem" and "imply" connote uncertainty. "Imply" has the added connotation of intentionality (e.g. the author intended this implication, but did not want to outright state it) whereas "seem" does not necessarily connote intention. "Seems to be implied" is technically grammatical but it's wordy and most copyediters would try to shorten the phrase to be more concise. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I was trying to avoid, because people often use "implied" as a loophole to lend weight to their speculations (along with "hinted"), and dark skin combined with a Semitic name doesn't tell you anything about the intentions of the authors, especially in a universe where the future have mixed people's population. Moreover, as far as I remember, in a promotional interview, the producers directly drew attention to the idea of ethnic ​​​​diversity in their ideas for the future of the show. In general, you want to say that implied is ambiguous, but still implies an indication of some kind of intention? Solaire the knight (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"In general, you want to say that implied is ambiguous, but still implies an indication of some kind of intention?" Yes that's the way I understand the nuance of that word. Someone implied something with an intention. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then how do you view the idea of ​​rewriting this in the context of "it's likely/plausible, but it's not explicitly stated anywhere"? I doubt that Suletta is just tanned (I do not know the practice, but I heard that in the USA the ethnicity of children of mixed marriages is determined by a non-white parent), but it seems to me that the definition of ethnicity by name and skin color is still speculative. Solaire the knight (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of additional sources that more explicitly address it, I don't know how much more can be written on the topic. From the evidence, I think it's pretty clear that Suletta's heritage is MENA but my evaluation isn't the one that matters. Obviously it's not an accident that she looks the way she looks (i.e. someone made her look that way on purpose), but we can't say any more for sure. I think "implied" is the right level of vagueness to use in the article for now. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the sources, all I saw in the interview in relation to her ethnic origin is the words of the producer that "this is the future, so we decided to give Suletta a darker skin color, assuming that in the future all the peoples mixed up and we wanted to display it's diversity." Not literally, of course, but close to it. Personally, I would assume that her roots probably refer to Pakistanis or Indians as typical non-Japanese migrants (such characters are quite popular in Japanese media these days, remember "Do it Yourself"), but that would also be speculation. All I can say is that she is probably a child of mixed marriage given her mother. Solaire the knight (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, anonymous is indeed motivated by a political conflict of interest. For example, he directly sees the presence of this text in the article as a "political attack". It's funny that he directly wrote about this right after another user tried to convince me that the anonymous person was not discussing the case itself, instead of the validity of adding it to the article. Anonymous even supported him, but still did not realize that the next comment proves my case and refutes his defender. Solaire the knight (talk) 06:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to engage with people whose arguments lack substance. The lack of substance will be self-evident to the closer of the discussion. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Axem Titanium (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest-selling products and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-played video games by player count—greatly appreciate the Jagged 85/Maestro2016 cleanup. JOEBRO64 18:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it! Axem Titanium (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I was a little cranky with that first AfD comment, so I thank you for responding to it in good spirits and giving me the benefit of the doubt. jp×g 05:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. Disagreements happen and all sides believe in the strength of their convictions. I enjoy your work on the Signpost. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Your joke at the De Mirage AfD was great 10/10. I always love to see that kind of humor around here. Thanks for keeping this place fun. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 05:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added a list of invisible sources to the Reception section of Kefka. I don't really feel like expanding it, just copyediting and restructuring, so feel free to implement them if you like. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Axem Titanium (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know you mentioned you had some sources for the articles but were busy, would you be able to add them to the ref ideas template on the talk page? I can work on them after I get Wooloo to GA.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man: Sorry, I've been out of town this week and just catching up on messages. I can't seem to find all of them at the moment, but I still have [1] and [2] open in a browser tab so those must have been among them 😅. I think I'll have some time to locate them and work on the article tomorrow afternoon. Thanks for your help in the meantime! Axem Titanium (talk) 02:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Balthier. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey do you wanna be a part of a Discord group chat created to collaborate on improving character articles - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cukie Gherkin: Oops, must have forgotten to reply to this message. I'm not sure I'd be that active, but I may lurk from time to time if you want to send me the invite link. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Axem Titanium: [3] - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I already added the Polygon article at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. I have removed the duplicate. Thanks. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Minor characters in Kirby: Right Back at Ya! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 25 § Minor characters in Kirby: Right Back at Ya! until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sanzaru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 3 § Sanzaru until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, it's been 10 years already? Amazing! Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice on organizing the Legend of Zelda characters page. I went and organized the characters by their games, and it looks a lot better. I'm sure there is still things that can be done to make it look better, but this is a great first start. Thank you again! HylianNerd (talk) 12:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, welcome to editing! I'll poke around and see what I can help with when I get a chance. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One quick thing I would note is that using detailed edit summaries will help others see what your intentions are. For example, you said "Fixed the page" but didn't specify what you did (and accidentally removed a section, which was an honest mistake). For potentially controversial changes, you can also wikilink directly to the discussion about the change, especially in this case since it didn't happen on the article's talk page. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Martin O'Donnell § Infobox discussion. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Unreal Engine Technology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 21 § Unreal Engine Technology until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to create an article for Laguna Loire but after seeing that the VIII articles are in a good topic I had to merge it to the sandbox here. Could you give it a look and check its prose to see if it can be remade? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 03:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I've been really busy last week. I'll try to take a look this week when I can. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]