User talk:Erachima

Archives

01 Perm. link 01

02 Perm. link 02

03 Perm. link 03

04 Perm. link 04

05 Perm. link 05

06 Perm. link 06

07 Perm. link 07

08 Perm. link 08

09 Perm. link 09

10 Perm. link 10

This page is archived every 25 topics, by the removal of the oldest 25 topics.

I've put the revamped layout up. I think it covers you concerns... please take a look. - J Greb 00:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee. Well, it was vandalism in the technical sense, but I have permission ;)--§hanel 05:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can be my new hero today - loved the way you wrapped that up with a neat little bow. I had laboriously said more or less the same thing in my planned post, but got an edit conflict because you had done it so much more effectively. Nice work, I won't tarnish it with needless additional commentary. Thanks --Risker 06:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See now, I had just settled in for a nice quiet evening of editing Celebrity sex tapes and suddenly I realise that my calendar is wrong. I thought it was April 1 but it seems in this alternate reality that it is indeed February 2.--Risker 06:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the hints simply don't get through to some people: WP:AN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Risker (talk • contribs) 07:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This guy seems to like playing with fire on WP:AN. His posting method is bound to irritate an admin or two - smilies on AN? I can't quite rid myself of an image of a younger editor who's been taken under someone's wing, to his detriment. Risker 07:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...I meant you too. If we can find a way to avoid the word "founder" anywhere in the article, that will be good. It also has the benefit of explaining why Wales would still be in position to ask Essjay to resign; by six years down the road, most founders are either gone or officially hold a position. Please watch out for 3RR, some people are very picky on it lately and we may have permanently lost Gwen Gale from Wikipedia (let alone the article) over it. Risker 19:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I eventually figured that out. I have learned more about patience and diplomacy editing this article than I have in a lifetime of working in a very sensitive career field. Sorry to disappear in the midst of it all, had to go rescue my lost wallet. I see Aza Toth has protected the article for a full week. This should be interesting, I half expect someone will take this opportunity to AfD it...Risker 22:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see C.m.jones has reappeared. That reminds me of my last edit on this page [1]. I've never sent anything to MfD, and was sort of biding my time on this to use it when necessary, but perhaps it is time? Risker 01:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was thinking it probably needed to be done. I have no idea how to do a multiple MfD, so will do separate ones, it will just take me a while to work through the process. --Risker 01:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay..first one is here[2]. --Risker 02:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now you tell me...although I'm not entirely sure how I would have linked the boxes on the user subpages to the discussion. Well, if I have badly screwed up, someone will give me a blast but clean it up. Hopefully they will tell me how to do it right next time, although I will do my best not to have a next time. It took me a week to screw up the courage to nominate a single, complete hoax article for AfD the first time. Risker 03:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good joke, but now we have a looping sub-category ;) – Chacor 16:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am honoured that my talk page has been graced with this blessing ;)--Risker 22:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a look at the cool wall section about copyright and my related user talk page please.--Lucy-marie 23:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As April Fool's is over, and WP:SIG has been updated to specifically disallow categories in signatures, please stop categorizing pages in to Category:Pages blessed by the input of Wikipedia user tjstrf. This category has been Speedily Deleted. All pages in this category were decategorized as of about 15 mins ago. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are in violation of 3RR on Essjay controversy [3] [4] [5] [6] [7].

I have not decided to block you at this point, but if you editing style continues this way I will issue a WP:3RR block. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 01:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wel were about the same age so i think i can ask you this w/o offending you: Why in the hell does he need to revert my questions! Like this one:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Welcome_to_the_N.H.K.&diff=120261742&oldid=107680217

that was NONE of his...forget it! There was no reason in hell he had to do that! I cant comfirm it but, He likely has never even seen that artical and he shoves his nose in it so im going to re do that question and if he does it again, ill take that as a lack of respect for someone and...report him!--Tatshro Satou 16:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you should report him to an administrator, like Metros232! He be interested to hear about this! ^_^ –Gunslinger47 18:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your responce but i really dont get it! How is NHK romance/drama? Its more ecchi,lolicon,black comady not R/D!--Tatshro Satou 17:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please tell me does this lok like a real question or a smart ass vandal:

• my 10 mg tabs have lost there effect. i bought some insulin syringes, can i crush the pills mix with water and shoot it for better effect?--Tatshro Satou 17:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me how it matters after you read this: Wikipedia:Assume good faith. –Gunslinger47 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie

• Comment. This is the latest round in an ongoing argument over the page between User:Konstable and User:Moe Epsilon, both of whom have been extraordinarily lame about the whole issue. --tjstrf talk 17:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would personally like to thank you for dragging me into a MFD I wasn't involved in, an MFD I never edited, and when I wasn't even active on Wikipedia at the time. And thank you so very much with the personal attack. — Moe 06:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/QuackGuru, just started. Any help in setting this up would be appreciated. -- Ned Scott 02:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Bleach is now an official task force. If you would like to become a member, just add you name to the appropriate place on the page. Thank you for your support, and happy editing. // DecaimientoPoético 21:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I'm sorry why I didn't think of it before. This [what I'm doing now] is too painstaking. I'm reverting myself (the category placements at least) and putting the supershuman cats. in the characters category section. Perhaps, can I ask for your assistance? ~I'm anonymous

So, should we just remove them entirely? That's what I've been doing up until now. Let me do this: for the time being, they'll be put into Category:Naruto characters and Category:Bleach characters. Is that understandable? ~I'm anonymous

I had a second thought on that one on Ichigo's article. That's why I had the category stay in the Shinigami category. Is he the fastest in the series? ~I'm anonymous

Oh, it was an accident on my part (on Chad's article). I was distracted about it, sorry. Still, the super speed cat. on Ichigo shouldn't be there. Hmm... ~I'm anonymous

I won't argue. I trust you know what you're doing though. ~I'm anonymous

Hi there. I have a few more things to say, if you don't mind:

1. Is there anyone in BLEACH that can fly? The Shinigami's perhaps? Or anyone you know of other characters in other manga and/or anime series?
2. Looking back at Ichigo Kurosaki's article, instead of leaving him in the fictional character with superspeed cat., he should be in Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds instead because his origin was in a manga, not another type of written fiction, far as I know. ~I'm anonymous

I shall add Toshiro to the category then. Oh, by the way, I sent a message to User:Someguy0830 (a user who sometimes edits the BLEACH articles) on his opinion regarding whether Ichigo should individually be in the super-speed category or not; as far as I'm concerned, he is a Shinigami and I believe he obtained that power after he became one. If he had it when he was a "normal human", I'd understand. It just still bothers me, no offense — I just want a third person's opinion on this. Peace. ~I'm anonymous

I see where you're coming from, however, it was an ability he attained after he wielded the zanpakutō and/or became a Shinigami. Understandable? I've seen some of BLEACH on Cartoon Network to know some things; its not a bad show, it just isn't interesting in my eyes. But likewise, he "used to" be a human, ergo, once Rukia (I'm sure it was her) introduced him to that stuff, he then later developed that signature super-speed ability, right? Is there anything I've said wrong here? ~I'm anonymous

My whole point here is that if it weren't for that girl, he wouldn't have attained such powers, period. He would never (I believe) had notably been as fast as said to be. Let's use Son Goku of Dragon Ball for example: his speed was so astounding since his childhood years that he eventually became the fastest character in the entire series (in his Super Saiyan 3 and 4 forms, that is) yet, he is not individually in the category. He is in the Z Fighters cat. which leads to the DB superhuman cat. Is my point clear? I don't know how to explain it further, but maybe you can reconsider Ichigo being in the category? Peace ~I'm anonymous

That bankai is sort of like what Goku's Kaio ken is, or an "Eight Gates" ability I read that Rock Lee and Might Guy (from Naruto) can perform. Regardless — Goku is the fastest in his own universe; Might Guy may be the fastest in his own universe, and Ichigo may be the fastest in his: evidently, they all share a "super speed ability" in their own respective categories — Category:Dragon Ball superhuman characters, Category:Naruto characters, Category:Shinigami in Bleach. Convinced? If things were like this then Goku, Guy, and anyone else who has the signature move of super-speed would individually be put into the category. This is why I'm bothered by it, it makes it sound like Ichigo is the only one who deserves to be put in there, whilst there are probably others out that actually need to be in the cat. because they don't share a characters only cat. with superhuman abilities. If this doesn't cling to you and make you reconsider, then I give. ~I'm anonymous

No thanks. I've repeated myself enough. Sometimes I wish people would think the same. Sounds like we're very different in ideals. ~I'm anonymous

If you want, could you get someone else to share their thought in light of the subject? Also, about that Flash guy, he should be placed in Category:DC Comics characters who can move at superhuman speeds (which is nominated for deletion for some reason). ~I'm anonymous

There's no sign of an autoblock either. As this account has been used three times – twice on its own user page, and once to leave me an unsigned and uncivil message, I suspect that it's either simply a troll account or a sock-puppet of someone that I did block. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think a lot of us (judging by the block logs I see when I'm following up on vandalism) are taking advantage of the fact that we can block anons while leaving accounts (and account creation) unaffected. But that's also why it's very unlikely to be an autoblock — I almost always make blocks "anon only", and always when it's more than twenty-four hours. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Those few who still explain in edit summaries what they're doing seem to me to deserve recognition. Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even then it's better than most people manage. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. GA reached. LordHarris 11:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know im going to wish i never even talk to but i want you to know i am not a problem anymore! Ihave done GREAT edits on 2 different wiki's and i have studyed the rules so dont worry ok! Just calm down! --Lolcon-R-US 17:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary on Wikipedia talk:Signatures ("Why must this page double as Wikipedia talk:Questions from the clueless and semi-deranged rants?") made me laugh, thanks :) ~MDD4696 05:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the welcome!

I just like putting what I did on the discussion to make sure that people know where I'm coming from and whatnot. And to make sure people actually check up on my facts in the case that I'm not 100% up to date (Like in the case of +anima, where I'd not gotten to volume 4 yet. I'm remedying that right now, though).

I'm also not entirely sane. I just try to look like it whilst writing, 'cause it makes it look cool. And, y'know, so that people can actually read it and understand it/not feel compelled to gourge out their eyes with rusty sporks (if such a thing exists). DaniDaniDanica 02:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must've read it wrong. Mwsilvabreen 12:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you telling me to stop edit warring while engaging in said edit warring yourself? Who are you to decide what the article is about? Looks like you are making an rfc inevitable, which is a shame but a pro paedophile article is worse, SqueakBox 23:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am geting support too. I am far too experienced to think edit warring achieves anything though in this case perhaps it is a staement. Anyway thanks for acknowledging that you are edit warring too, SqueakBox 01:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, tjstrf. I don't remember if we've actually "met" on here before, but yes, I do seem to be the Chosen One of the moment. He seems to have shifted attention from Szyslak to me in the past week or so. I expect him to find someone more interesting by and by. If you wouldn't mind, could you watchlist my talk, user, and subpages for a while? It'd be better to have a few pairs of eyes watching rather than just one. We've just gotta completely stonewall the dumb bastard until he gives up or discovers online pornography or heroin or something else that engages his fragile, easily-amused mind more than Wikipedia. --Dynaflow babble 08:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's currently obsessed with UC Riverside-related pages (which is where I first got into a tussle with him), pages related to Harvard, talk and discussion pages of his old socks, and the userpages of his "enemies," starting his most recent antagonist and going backwards, it seems. He also recreates the UCR mascot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) articles, but he'll be disappointed to discover, whenever he makes his next attack, than an admin finally got around to salting all variations of the title. We've managed to stop him really quickly as of late (10-15 mins.), so I'm not sure how a full-scale attack would pan out were it left to run its twisted course. Oh, I also have a possible, partial ID on who he might be (see User:Dynaflow/Wikihilarity#The_continuing_saga_of_SummerThunder.2C_the_sock-puppet_edit_warrior). I've also updated the Wikipedia:Long term abuse/SummerThunder page with the latest details. --Dynaflow babble 09:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tjstrf, I want to nominate you for adminship, I'm pretty sure you would be a good sysop. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators to check what are admin's roles, and let me know if it's ok for you ;-) «Snowolf ^{How can I help?}» 22:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The FSN article has currently 18 categories, including Category:Type-Moon. That category specifically is meant to categorize articles related to Type-Moon, so I don't see how it's in any way redundant. I would agree if say there was also a category on Type-Moon games, then I wouldn't agree that the Type-Moon category should be used, but as of now, you cannot remove that category on the basis of it being redundant as I do not see how that is possible.--十八 22:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The third guideline listed says itself that there are exceptions, and this is one of them. The example used is that Golden Gate Bridge should be in Category:Suspension bridges and not Category:Bridges and this of course is obvious to reduce redundancy. But if we use that as an analogy, let's say Category:Type-Moon is to Category:Bridges as Category:Type-Moon games is to Category:Suspension bridges. There is no (current) subcategory to list the Type-Moon games in, so thus the Category:Type-Moon itself must be used to show how this game is connected to all of Type-Moon's products since it is one of the companies most popular works to date. See Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories#When to duplicate for more.--十八 22:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then, do as you wish. Though I believe the reason why we have Category:Fate/stay night and Category:Tsukihime is because there are a bunch of articles related to each and a category aids in navigation. And IMO 18 is not too many as it takes up merely 2 lines at the bottom of the article.--十八 23:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going through the list here, all mass-uploaded by a single user. I appreciate any help you can provide with these images. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to do the conversion myself, but I see you're a man of action =) I bet that was one boring edit, good job. --Darkbane ^talk 03:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I told User:Poetic Decay, WP:SPOILER is not yet policy. I don't think you should post a note using something that is not yet a policy as its base. Gdo01 02:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? That might be worth mentioning. Where's it listed? — Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orihime and Ishida have a kid?! Then does that mean that Chad and Yoruichi have a flash-stepping demon-armed spawn too?! But seriously, I think I have a point... Chozen1 02:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency reasons, should articles similar to List of Bleach Agent of the Shinigami arc episodes be created for the rest? Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, I did not mean that they all should be submitted to WP:FLC, but perhaps I was unclear. Thanks for the response in any case. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no, im saying that you would call a natzi a natzi, even if it wasnt bery nice, thus, when i see someone who likes to erase history and replace it with sometihng warm and fuzzy, i call hem such. the example was only to illustrate a pointCharred Feathers 08:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for that. I had a little too much angst that night from a rather inane discussion at Talk:Naruto Uzumaki. Best of luck to your Redwall editing. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 18:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That clears up everything. Chozen1 18:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

to answer this question "(Graduation's over, so I'm not really a senior anymore... but what am I?)" isnt that called an alumnus?Charred Feathers 10:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please review my article namely- Himachal Pradesh. I would be really grateful to you. May i know where would you review it (if it eases you). i mean to say can you gave me a link to that page where the review for the article would be done. Sushant gupta (talk · contribs) 10:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just got done watching BLEACH episode #117 on YouTube. Clearly, the Vizard demonstrate superhuman speeds and flight. If jumping from the air isn't flight, what would it be called? You've seen the episode before? Lord Sesshomaru

Sorry for replying late, got caught up in a heated arguement. So, the Vizard walk on air? Hmmm... does that even have a name? Air bending perhaps? Or does it have more to do with their ghostly nature? Lord Sesshomaru

Ok, I would consider it "flying". I mean, you saw how the two jumped from the air and slowly landed onto a building right? When about to battle Toshiro? I'll place them in that flight category, and the super strength and speed for now. If anyone disagrees and reverts, I won't continuously dispute it as I have my reasons. As for Ichigo Kurosaki and Yoruichi Shihouin, I'm leaning towards adding them to the flying category too since the grandparent cat says: "The category also includes characters flying using items or tools as opposed to through force of will...". Any more objections then? I think this has been decided. Lord Sesshomaru

Yes, and I plan to categorize the Arrancar redirect with the three top mentioned categories as well. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru

I wish there was a way to categorize "air walking". Maybe a new category needs to be made for that. Your feelings on the flying item usage is negative? Lord Sesshomaru

Okay, to your belief, a character should only be categorized by popularity. Meaning, Ichigo's trademark cat. is speed, not the flying item. Same for the Yoruichi girl. That right? Lord Sesshomaru

What did you mean when you said, "I disagree on all counts but one", in your edit summary? What was that one? Lord Sesshomaru

I understand about the fire example. But of your edit summary? Lord Sesshomaru

I guess only the anime and manga superhuman strength and superhuman speed cats. shall be added to Vizard. Anything more you'd like to add before I do so? Lord Sesshomaru

It is a group of characters page, hence, the categories can serve for a group as a whole. Did you not see that? Lord Sesshomaru

Shouldn't the page be moved to Vizard in Bleach for consistency? And what about categories for D-Roy and Grimmjow? Redirected articles can have categories, as I've done for Chaozu and Piccolo Daimao. Lord Sesshomaru

You forgot to mention if the redirect is targeted to a section or list, as such {{R to section}} or {{R to list entry}}, then other categories are allowed since this guideline section is neutral, not all against it. From what we do know about D-Roy and Grimmjow is that they specialize in air combat, as said in the anime at least. Overall, are you saying that I should drop this category talk and move on? You're hinting towards it, as I can see, you don't think any other categories are needed for the Bleach-related articles. Are you 100% sure on that? Lord Sesshomaru

It also tells you when it's a situation where a legitimate altername name or the like is being categorized. "X can fly" is a trivial use, not a legitimate one. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my guess is that you were trying to revert the anon who was soapboxing. However, I had just reverted him/her, and I'm not sure what your edit did.[8] Could you take a look, and self-revert if you think it necessary. It may have been some kind of software glitch, and I can't see what it did to the actual page, but it may have changed the coding. Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 22:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name in lower case, as you wish, sir. Peacent 07:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, Tristan. I hope luck is on your side. Peacent 06:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That image is not free nor was it drawn by Kasuga (as the signature next to Wikipe-tan's arm states). It was uploaded by trolling accounts locally, and then they have gone to the Commons. Please leave the image that is at the article there.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why are you taking it away?!!! i saw here wasnt a category so i made one.-hotspot

i dont know wat op stands for is it opening credits

does he get is powers for good it says "in the anime's Bount arc, Uryū recovers his powers for a short period through an ancient Quincy artifact" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Replacment 4 the hulk (talk • contribs).

Correct me if I'm mistaken, but has it not been ten days since the nomination? Sephiroth BCR (Converse) Sephiroth BCR 18:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If LoliWikipe-tan is not a Lolicon image, why is she illustrating that article? Why is her name LoliWikipe-tan? Folks were insistent that a proper image was required that accurately illustrated Lolicon, and that a new one was needed because the previous image was too mature. Please correct the specific terminology if necessary, but the word Lolicon should be there somewhere, don't you think? If there's nothing wrong with it, why obfuscate the nature of the image with the caption that is there? -Jmh123 22:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying. The entry says, "The meaning of lolicon has evolved much in the West...In the West, lolicon refers to anime or manga that contains sexual or erotic portrayals of prepubescent or childlike characters, and is thus close cognate to the Japanese term lolicon manga.[4] The use of the word lolicon is an indication that the material is overtly—even if not explicitly—erotic.[5]" I was thinking if you can have an anime figure, you can have a lolicon image. My problem remains; the caption shouldn't hide the true meaning of the image. How about "Wikipe-tan in a pose suggestive of lolicon anime"? -Jmh123 23:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not fine with it, obviously. Rather than edit war, I am trying to work out a compromise. Are you unwilling? -Jmh123 23:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what episode does he get his powers back the first time? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Replacment 4 the hulk (talk • contribs).}

u got good info thanks for the help —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Replacment 4 the hulk (talk • contribs).}

I didn't see you invoking WP:IDONTLIKEIT to those who wanted a new image because they didn't like the old one, or questioning the validity of the argument when it was made to Ryulong. 83.245.135.80/AKA Anonyymi's argument at the end is completely self-contradictory. I don't think you are applying WP:IDONTLIKEIT consistently. Granted one regards deletion of the image and the other replacing it, but the spirit of the idea of "not liking" is the same. -Jmh123 23:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to make diffs, but because I was addressing a large number of comments, it was easier to just quote. I apologize for messing up your user page. Like I said, it's the spirit of "not liking" I'm questioning. That the motivation of those comments I quoted was in the nature of pure aesthetics in the spirit of improving the encyclopedia is an opinion we'll have to agree to disagree on. You said the same thing to Herostratus as you said to Tony, and his opinion was definitely not without explanation beyond, "I don't like it." He was objecting specifically to the use of Wikipedia symbols and would've left the whole thing alone if not for that, as would I. -Jmh123 01:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about your RfA, I really hoped you would have carried on as it was by no means certain that it would have failed. I still think you would have made a fine admin and I really hope you'll apply again in the future. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just saw that you withdrew your RfA. I thought that you were sailing through it easily, and was wondering why you decided to withdraw. I hope you decide to stay here at Wikipedia, and if youre ever nominate agian I will support you. BH (Talk) 00:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, you would have passed, too. Ah well, next time will likely be better. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why the sudden closure? I think you could have made it. Well, shucks, your RfA shouldn't have been so damn tough. Anyway, please drop me a note if you ever change your mind. You can count on my support as many times as you need. Peacent 02:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't understand either. Disputes are disputes, I believe you would have succeeded regardless. Lord Sesshomaru

I had left my user page on Wikipedia as it was on May 12, 2007. I find out almost a month later following an off-Wikipedia source, thet my user page was vandalized.

I do belive and have CONFIRMATION that the vandals (cyberbullies) known as users Yonathan, in which I belive to be a man named Jonathan from another site called TV News Talk, and Marcus TVNT, who claims to work in that site's legal department and has made a legal threat against me, have vandalized my user page, and I have printed off the evidence in which most of the vandalized page has been since been proven false proving them wrong, as I belive that they are in my trap, and felt I needed to contact them on their user page, pursuant to Wikipedia policy.

So with that in mind, I would appreciate if I get to the bottom of this dispute that will eventually end at Wikipedia, as long as this dispute has been met to my standards.

Sincerely,

(Aeverine Frathleen Nieves 06:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I rewatched episode #4 of the English anime and Rukia says something to the effect of: "In this gigai [body], I can't fly". What was that supposed to mean? The shinigami can fly? Lord Sesshomaru

I thought that was what she meant. When someone mentions flight, do fans usually think of the Dragon Ball flight or something else? Lord Sesshomaru

I suppose there is no category I can create to make up for the shinigami's unique "air-locomotion"? Something akin to Category:Anime and manga characters who can locomote anywhere? Suggestions? Lord Sesshomaru

Guess you're right. I do wish a distinction would be made so that fans who only watch the dub would know. Evidently, it is best just lefted uncategorized. Lord Sesshomaru

Was going to leave this on the AFD page, but thought I would leave it here because it isn't related to that article's deletion. As I said in the AFD, thank you for the information about Saint Seiya. As an American, it is difficult for me to keep track of every manga that hasn't made it big here in the States. I would, however, ask you not to be so sarcastic next time you inform someone about something like this. Just because it's very obvious to you that this manga is so popular doesn't mean that it is that obvious to everyone. I am doing my best to call it like I see it, and even though I try to follow anime and manga to what extent I can, it's impossible for me to get everything that's big (especially outside of this country) on my radar. Again, thank you for the information. Best regards, bwowen ^talk.^contribs 04:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]