[go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F. ; DavidF. Layton, .
In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 26

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Poverty and Informal Trade. (2017). Barros, Carlos ; Chivangue, Andes .
    In: CEsA Working Papers.
    RePEc:cav:cavwpp:wp151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Sustainable Tourism in Inhambane-Mozambique. (2012). Barros, Carlos.
    In: CEsA Working Papers.
    RePEc:cav:cavwpp:wp105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:64-75.

  2. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. & Williams, M. 1994. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26:271-292.

  3. Beggs, S., Cardell, S. & Hausman, J. 1981. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics 16:1-19.

  4. Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Williams, M. & Louviere, J. 1996. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18:243-253.

  5. Brownstone, D. & Train, K. 1999. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89(1): 109-129.

  6. Cameron, T. A., Poe G. L., Ethier, R.G., Schulze, W.D. (2001) Alternative Nonmarket Value-Elicitation Methods: Are Underlying Preferences the Same? Forthcoming in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

  7. Chapman, R.G. & Staelin, R. 1982. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 288-30 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Desvouges, W.H. & Smith, V.K. 1983. Option price estimates for water quality improvements: a contingent valuation study for Monogahela river. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14:248-267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Hanemann, M. W. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66:332-341.

  10. Hanemann, M. W., Loomis, J. & Kanninen, B. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1255:1263.

  11. Hanemann, M.W. & Kanninen, B. 1999. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In: Bateman, I. & Willis, K. (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Hausman, J.A. & Ruud, P.A. 1987. Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. Journal of Econometrics 34:83-104.

  13. Hensher, D, Louviere, J.J. & Swait, J. 1999. Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics 89:197-221.

  14. Johnson, N.L. Kotz, S. & Balakrishnan, N. 1994. Continuous univari ate distributions. 2nd edition. John Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Krinsky, I. and Robb, A. 1986. Approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economic and Statistics 68:715-719.

  16. Layton, D.F. 2000. Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40:21-36.

  17. Layton, D.F. 2001. Notes on one parameter family of distributions for random coefficient models. Department of Environmental Policy and Science. University of California, Davis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. MacKenzie, J. A 1993. Comparison of Contingent Preference Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:593-603.

  19. Magat, W.A., Viscusi, W.K. & Huber, J. 1988. Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:395-411.

  20. McFadden, D. & Train, K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Forthcoming in Journal of Applied Econometrics.

  21. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Pollak, R.A. & Wales, T.R. 1991. The likelihood dominance criterion: a new approach to model selection. Journal of Econometrics 47:227-242.

  23. Ready, R., Whitehead, J. & Blomquist, G. 1995. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:181-197.

  24. Revelt, D. & Train, K. 1998. Mixed logit with repeated choice: households choices of appliance efficiency level. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 80: 647-657.

  25. Stevens, T.H., Belkner, R., Dennis, D., Kittredge, D. & Willis, C. 2000. Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management. Ecological Economics 32: 63-74.

  26. Swait, J. & Louviere, J. 1993. The role of scale parameter in the estimation and use of generalized extreme utility models. Journal of Marketing Research 10:23-45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Longo, Alberto ; Kee, Frank ; Tully, Mark A ; Hunter, Ruth F ; Hutchinson, George W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan .
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rungie, Cam ; Thiene, Mara.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Nieboer, Anna P. ; Stolk, Elly A..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Sprott, David ; Manning, Kenneth.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Day, Brett ; Jose Luis Pinto Prades, ; PintoPrades, Jose Luis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, A. ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Giuda, Alita ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Petajisto, Leena ; Horne, Paula .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Rowe, Robert D. ; Breffle, William S..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Madden, Gary ; Savage, Scott ; Simpson, Michael .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). DavidF. Layton, ; Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner .
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-23 08:08:57 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.