[go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 47

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz, W.L., Boxall, P.C., Williams, M., Louviere, J. (1998), Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1), 64-75 .

  2. Andreoni, J. (1989), Giving with Impure Altruism, Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence, Journal of Political Economy 97(6), 1447-1458.

  3. Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H. and Rasbash, J. (2001), Elicitation Effects in contingent Valuation Studies, in: Bateman, I.J. and Willis, K.G. (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences, Oxford University Press, 511-539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bishop, R. and Heberlein, T. (1979), Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: are indirect measures biased?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(4), 926-930.

  5. Blomquist, G.C. and Whitehead, J.C. (1998), Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation, Resource and Energy Economics 20, 179-196.

  6. Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., Swait, J., Williams, M., Louviere, J. (1996), A comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation, Ecological Economics 18(3), 243253 .

  7. Carson, R.T. (1997), Contingent Valuation: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests since the NOAA Panel, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(5), 1501-1507.

  8. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E. and Meade, N.F. (2001), Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics 19, 173-210.

  9. Chapin, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E., Mack, M.C., Díaz, S. (2000), Consequences of Changing Biodiversity, Nature 405, 234-242.

  10. Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F.R., Dunford, R.W., Boyle, K.J., Hudson, S.P., Wilson, K.N. (1993), Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability, in: Hausman, J.A. (ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 3-38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Elton, C.S. (1958), Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, Chapman & Hall, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Faber, M., Petersen, T. and Schiller, J. (2002), Homo oeconomicus and homo politicus in Ecological Economics, Ecological Economics 40(3), 323-333.

  13. Foster, V. and Mourato, S. (2000), Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticide Use in the UK: A Contingent Ranking Approach, Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(1), 1-21.

  14. Garrod, G.D. and Willis, K.G. (1997), The non-use Benefits of enhancing Forest Biodiversity: A contingent ranking Study, Ecological Economics 21(1), 45-61.

  15. Gowdy, J. M. (1997), The Value of Biodiversity: Markets, Society, and Ecosystems, Land Economics 73(1), 25-41.

  16. Haefele, M.A. and Loomis, J.B. (2001), Using the Conjoint Analysis Technique for the Estimation of Passive Use Values of Forest Health, Journal of Forest Economics 7(1), 9-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J.B. and Kanninen, B. (1991), Statistical Efficiency of DoubleBounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4), 1255-1263.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Hanley, N., Mourato, S. and Wright, R.E. (2001), Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation?, Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3), 435-462.

  19. Hanley, N., Spash, C. and Walker, L. (1995), Problems in Valuing the Benefits of Biodiversity Protection, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 249-272.

  20. Hausman, J. (ed., 1993), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Amsterdam: North Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Hawksworth, D.L. and Kalin-Arroyo, M.T. (1995), Magnitude and Distribution of Biodiversity, in: Heywood, V.H. (ed.), Global Biodiversity Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 107-191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Johnson, F. R. and Mathews, K. E. (2001), Sources and Effects of Utility-theoretic Inconsistencies in Stated-Preference Surveys, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(5), 1328-1333.

  23. Johnson, F.R., Desvousges, W.H., Wood, L.L., Fries, E.E. (1995), Conjoint Analysis of individual and aggregate environmental preferences, TER Technical Working Paper No. T9502, Research Triangle, N.C., Triangle Economic Research.

  24. Kahn, J.R., ONeill, R and Stewart, S. (2001), Stated Preference Approaches to the Measurement of the Value of Biodiversity, in: OECD (ed.): Valuation of Biodiversity Benefits Selected Studies, Paris, 93-120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.L. (1992), Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57-70.

  26. Lancaster, K. (1966), A New Approach to Consumer Theory, Journal of Political Economy 84, 132-157.

  27. Lawton, J.H. (1994), What do Species do in Ecosystems?, Oikos 71, 367-374.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Lockwood, M. (1999), Humans Valuing Nature: Synthesising Insights from Philosophy, Psychology and Economics, Environmental Values 8, 381-401.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Loomis, J.B. and White, D.S. (1996), Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics 18, 197-206.

  30. May, R.M. (1973), Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. McCann, K.S. (2000), The Diversity Stability Debate, Nature 405, 228-233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Munro, A. and Hanley, N.D. (2001), Information, Uncertainty & Contingent Valuation, in: Bateman, I.J. and Willis, K.G. (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences, Oxford University Press, 258-279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Naeem, S., Thompson, L.J., Lawler, S.P., Lawton, J.H., Woodfin R.M. (1995), Empirical evidence that declining species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 347, 249-262.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Nunes, P.A.L.D. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001), Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense?, Ecological Economics 39, 203-222.

  35. Odum, E.P. (1953), Fundamentals of Ecology, Saunders, Philadelphia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Pimm, S.L., Russell, G.J., Gittleman, J.L., Brooks, T.M. (1995), The Future of Biodiversity, Science 269, 347-350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Purvis, A. and Hector, A. (2000), Getting the Measure of Diversity, Nature 405, 212-219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Roe, B., Boyle, K. and Teisl, M. (1996), Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31, 145-159.

  39. Rosenberger, R. S., Peterson, G. L., Clarke, A. and Brown, T. C. (2003), Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics, Ecological Economics 44(1), 63-76.

  40. Spash, C.L. and Hanley, N. (1995): Preferences, Information and Biodiversity Preservation, Ecological Modelling 12, 191-208 .

  41. Stevens, T.H., Barrett, C. and Willis, C.E. (1997), Conjoint Analysis of Groundwater Protection Programs, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26(2), 229-236.

  42. Stevens, T.H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R.J., Hager, T., More, T.A. (1991), Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?, Land Economics 67(4), 390-400.

  43. Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., Siemann E. (1997), The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes, Science 277, 1300-1302.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. UNEP (1992), Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Wardle, D.A., Zackrisson, O., Hörnberg, G., Gallet C. (1997), The Influence of Island Area on Ecosystem properties, Science 277, 1296-1299.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. WBGU (1999), World in Transition Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Biosphere, Earthscan, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Whitehead, J. and Blomquist G. (1991), Measuring Contingent Values for Wetlands: Effects of Information about Related Environmental Goods, Water Resources Research 27, 2523-2531.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Longo, Alberto ; Kee, Frank ; Tully, Mark A ; Hunter, Ruth F ; Hutchinson, George W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan .
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rungie, Cam ; Thiene, Mara.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Nieboer, Anna P. ; Stolk, Elly A..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Sprott, David ; Manning, Kenneth.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Day, Brett ; Jose Luis Pinto Prades, ; PintoPrades, Jose Luis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, A. ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Giuda, Alita ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Petajisto, Leena ; Horne, Paula .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Rowe, Robert D. ; Breffle, William S..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Madden, Gary ; Savage, Scott ; Simpson, Michael .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). DavidF. Layton, ; Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner .
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-27 00:38:28 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.