[go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Systematic Influences of Policy Implementation and Conservation Agents on Willingness to Pay for Land Preservation. (2006). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua.
In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
RePEc:ags:aaea06:21234.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 47

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 80(1): 64-75.

  2. American Farmland Trust. 1997. Saving Americas Farmland. What Works. Washington, D.C.: American Farmland Trust.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Bateman, Ian J., Matthew Cole, Philip Cooper, Stavros Georgiou, David Hadley, and Gregory L. Poe. 2004. On Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 71-93.

  4. Beasley, S.D., W.G. Workman, and N.A. Williams. 1986. Estimating Amenity Values of Urban Fringe Farmland: A Contingent Valuation Approach. Growth and Change 17: 70-78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bennett, J. and R. Blamey, eds. 2001. The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Bergstrom, J.C., B.L. Dillman, and J.R. Stoll. 1985. Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land. Southern Journal ofAgricultural Economics 17 (July): 139-149.

  7. Bosworth, R., T.R. Cameron, and J.R. DeShazo. 2006. Is An Ounce of Prevention Worth a Pound of Cure? Paper presented at W-1133 Annual Meetings, San Antonio, TX, February 23-25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Bowker, J. M. and D. D. Didychuk. 1994. Estimation of the nonmarket benefits of agricultural land retention in eastern Canada. Agricultural and Resource Economic Review 23(2): 2 18-225.

  9. Brown, T., P. Champ, R. Bishop and D. McCollum. 1996. Which Response Format Reveals the Truth About Donations to a Public Good. Land Economics 72(2): 152-166.

  10. Bulte, E., S. Gerking, J.A. List, and A. de Zeeuw. 2005. The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(2): 330-42.

  11. Dillman. D.A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Duke, J.M. and T.W. Ilvento. 2004. A conjoint analysis of public preferences for agricultural land preservation. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(2):209-219.

  13. Duke, Joshua M. and Lori Lynch. 2006. Four classes of farmland retention techniques: Comparative evaluation and property rights implications. Land Economics 82(2).

  14. Freeman, A.M. III, The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Halstead, J. 1984. Measuring the Non-market Value of Massachusetts Agricultural Land: A Case Study. Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 13 (Apr.), p. 12-19.

  17. Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 66(3): 332-341.

  18. Hensher, D.A. and W.H. Greene. 2003. The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice. Transportation 30(2): 133-176.

  19. Hu, Wuyang, M.M. Veeman and W.L. Adamowicz. 2005. Labeling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(1): 83-102.

  20. Inman, K. and D. McLeod. 2002. Property Rights and Public Interests: A Wyoming Agricultural Lands Study. Growth and Change 33(1): 91-114.

  21. Irwin, E.G. 2002. The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values. Land Economics 78(4): 465-48 1.

  22. Johnston, R.J., J.J. Opaluch, M.J. Mazzotta, and G. Magnusson. 2005. Who Are Resource Nonusers and What Can They Tell Us About Nonuse Values? Decomposing User and Nonuser Willingness to Pay for Coastal Wetland Restoration. Water Resources Research 41(7).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Johnston, R.J., S.K. Swallow, D.M. Bauer, and C.M. Anderson. 2003. Preferences for Residential Development Attributes and Support for the Policy Process: Implications for Management and Conservation of Rural Landscapes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1): 65-82.

  24. Johnston, R.J., T.F. Weaver, L.A. Smith, and S.K. Swallow. 1995. Contingent Valuation Focus Groups: Insights from Ethnographic Interview Techniques. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24 (1): 56-69.

  25. Kahneman, D., I. Ritov, K.E. Jacowitz, and P. Grant. 1993. Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective. Psychological Science 4: 310-315.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Kaplowicz, M.D., F. Lupi and J.P. Hoehn. 2004. Multiple Methods for Developing and Evaluating a Stated-Choice Questionnaire to Value Wetlands. Chapter 24 in Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, eds. S. Presser, J.M. Rothget, M.P. Coupter, J.T. Lesser, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Kline, J. and D. Wichelns. 1996. Public Preferences Regarding the Goals of Farmland Preservation Programs. Land Economics 72(4): 538-549.

  28. Krinsky, I. and R. Robb. 1986. On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4): 715-719.

  29. Kuhfeld, W.F. and R.D. Tobias. 2005. Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications. Technometrics 47(2):132-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Layton, D.F. 2000. Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40(1): 2 1-36.

  31. Lazo, J.K., G.H. McClelland and W.D. Schulze. 1997. Economic Theory and Psychology of Non-Use Values. Land Economics 73(3): 358-371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Loomis, J., K. Traynor, and T. Brown. 1999. Trichotomous Choice: A Possible Solution to Dual Response Objectives in Dichotomous Choice Contingnent Valuation Questions. Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics 24(2): 572-5 83.

  33. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Mansfield C.A. and V.K. Smith. 2002. Tradeoff at the trough: TMDLs and the evolving status of water quality policy. In J List, A de Zeeuw (eds.), Recent Advances in Environmental Economics. Cheltenhen, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 257-285.

  35. McConnell, K.E. 1990. Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1): 19-34.

  36. McConnell, K.E. 1997. Does Altruism Undermine Existence Value? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1): 22-37.

  37. McFadden, D. and K. Train. 2000. Mixed M~L Models for Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(5) :447-70.

  38. McGonagle, M.P. and S.K. Swallow. 2005. Open Space and Public Access: A Contingent Choice Application to Coastal Preservation. Land Economics 8 1(4): 477-495.

  39. McLeod, D., J. Woirhaye, and D. Menkhaus. 1999. Factors Influencing Support for Rural Land Use Control: A Case Study. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 28(1): 44-56.

  40. McLeod, D., J. Woirhaye, C. Kruse and D. Menkhaus. 1998. Private Open Space and Public Concerns. Review ofAgricultural Economics 20(2): 644-53.

  41. Mitchell, R.C. and R. T. Carson. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Opaluch, J.J., S.K. Swallow, T. Weaver, C. Wessells, and D. Wichelns. 1993. Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24(1) 41-59.

  43. Ozdemir. S. K.J. Boyle, M. Ahearn, A. Alberini, J. Bergstrom, L. Libby and M.P. Welsh. 2004. Preliminary Report: Farmland Conservation Easement Study for the United States, Georgia, Ohio and Maine Samples. Orono, ME: Department of Resource Economics and Policy, University of Maine.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Ready, R.C. and C. Abdalla. 2005. The Amenity and Disamenity Impacts of Agriculture: Estimates from a Hedonic Pricing Model. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 87(2): 3 14-326.

  45. Ready, R.C., M.C. Berger, and G.C. Blomquist. 1997. Measuring Amenity Benefits from Farmland: Hedonic Pricing vs. Contingent Valuation. Growth and Change 28 (Fall): 438-458.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rosenberger, R.S., R.G. Walsh, J.R. McKean, and C.J. Mucklow. 1996. Benefits of Ranch Open Space to Local Residents. Extension Bulletin XCM-201. Fort Collins: Cooperative Extension Agricultural Experiment Station, Colorado State University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Swait, J. and J. Louviere. 1993. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models. Journal of Marketing Research 30(3): 305314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Longo, Alberto ; Kee, Frank ; Tully, Mark A ; Hunter, Ruth F ; Hutchinson, George W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan .
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rungie, Cam ; Thiene, Mara.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Nieboer, Anna P. ; Stolk, Elly A..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Sprott, David ; Manning, Kenneth.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Day, Brett ; Jose Luis Pinto Prades, ; PintoPrades, Jose Luis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, A. ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Giuda, Alita ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Petajisto, Leena ; Horne, Paula .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Rowe, Robert D. ; Breffle, William S..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Madden, Gary ; Savage, Scott ; Simpson, Michael .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). DavidF. Layton, ; Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner .
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-19 12:56:26 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.