@violetto, did we consider removing this altogether at some point?

From T103719: Improve ToC

“Edit source | Edit” is scattered on every single topic to subtopics. Amount of links is overwhelming. What other ways can we make sure “Edit source | Edit” can be easily available without the need to include these links on every topic to subtopics.

@Prtksxna IMHO this doesn't belong to task improve ToC.

We could (for mouse-pointer only clients) enable edit source visibility on :hover. But that might have unforeseeable UX implications.

Yeah thinking about removing them, but I can't predict that there will be absolutely no "edit" links within the page. While there is one, should be sans-serif.

@violetto there's two sans-serif rules currently used, one is font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; for body text and then there's also font-family: 'Helvetica', 'Arial', sans-serif; for h3, h4 and p. What's your preference?

This one: font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;

@violetto @Prtksxna What do you think, should we try the :hover opacity change for the edit links on .mw-body-content?

What would you say that we're trying to do with the :hover opacity change?

In T107026#1489967, @Volker_E wrote:

What do you think, should we try the :hover opacity change for the edit links on .mw-body-content?

These aren't discoverable people who don't use the mouse much, and so I don't personally like them. I don't mind making it so, for other objective reasons.

Change 227592 had a related patch set uploaded (by VolkerE):
Unify font-family, edit links fonts and clean-up font related properties

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/227592