[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/spmain/hal-03370452.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dégressivité des allocations chômage : que peut-on en attendre ?

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Coquet

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract
Declining unemployment benefits is a popular provision of Unemployment Insurance, due to its intuitive mechanism of financial pressure on benefits recipients. However, it faces strong opposition from the targeted unemployed, and also in the economic literature. Indeed, when analyzing declining UI benefits into a comprehensive landscape of the various aspects of unemployment insurance, a large majority of economic studies rule out this design, theory largely favors constant or progressive benefits and, despite the immediate gains of a declining pattern as regards exits from unemployment and a fall of insurance expenditure, economic evaluations conclude to many adverse effects. In practice, only a minority of countries similar to France have implemented declining UI benefits. Despite this inauspicious background the insurer may choose this formula preventing the odds: if so, declining benefits should be part of a coherent set of UI rules, allowing for positive effects to materialize and preventing adverse effects. Reviewing the rules that will soon be implemented in France, five aspects are highlighted that could raise difficulties. We propose operational solutions that can shed light and feed the round of negotiation currently underway.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Coquet, 2020. "Dégressivité des allocations chômage : que peut-on en attendre ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03370452, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03370452
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03370452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03370452/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brigitte Dormont & Denis Fougère & Ana Prieto, 2001. "L'effet de l'allocation unique dégressive sur la reprise d'emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 343(1), pages 3-28.
    2. Rodolfo G Campos & J Ignacio García-Pérez & Iliana Reggio, 2022. "Moral Hazard Versus Liquidity and the Optimal Timing of Unemployment Benefits," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(648), pages 2674-2701.
    3. Cahuc, Pierre & Lehmann, Etienne, 2000. "Should unemployment benefits decrease with the unemployment spell?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 135-153, July.
    4. Stefano DellaVigna & Attila Lindner & Balázs Reizer & Johannes F. Schmieder, 2017. "Reference-Dependent Job Search: Evidence from Hungary," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1969-2018.
    5. Vahé Nafilyan, 2016. "Lost and found?: The cost of job loss in France," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 194, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno Coquet, 2022. "Les deux réformes de l'assurance chômage," Working Papers hal-04254941, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Coquet, 2017. "Les allocations chômage devraient-elles être dégressives ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03457573, HAL.
    2. Peter Fredriksson & Bertil Holmlund, 2006. "Improving Incentives in Unemployment Insurance: A Review of Recent Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 357-386, July.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2vagho9cns9668gqt9f4q5v8rg is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Attila Lindner & Balázs Reizer, 2020. "Front-Loading the Unemployment Benefit: An Empirical Assessment," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 140-174, July.
    5. Rioux, Laurence & Lollivier, Stefan, 2005. "A Structural Non-Stationary Model of Job Search: Stigmatization of the Unemployed by Job Offers or Wage Offers?," CEPR Discussion Papers 5108, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2vagho9cns9668gqt9f4q5v8rg is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Tomi Kyyrä, 2023. "The effects of unemployment assistance on unemployment exits," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(6), pages 1457-1480, December.
    8. David S. Lee & Pauline Leung & Christopher J. O’Leary & Zhuan Pei & Simon Quach, 2021. "Are Sufficient Statistics Necessary? Nonparametric Measurement of Deadweight Loss from Unemployment Insurance," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(S2), pages 455-506.
    9. Koenig, Felix & Manning, Alan & Petrongolo, Barbara, 2014. "Reservation wages and the wage flexibility puzzle," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60613, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Jan Boone & Peter Fredriksson & Bertil Holmlund & Jan C. van Ours, 2007. "Optimal Unemployment Insurance with Monitoring and Sanctions," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(518), pages 399-421, March.
    11. François Gerard & Joana Naritomi, 2021. "Job Displacement Insurance and (the Lack of) Consumption-Smoothing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 899-942, March.
    12. Sascha Drahs & Luke Haywood & Amelie Schiprowski, 2018. "Job Search with Subjective Wage Expectations," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1725, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Michele Belot & Philipp Kircher & Paul Muller, 2021. "Eliciting time preferences when income and consumption vary: Theory, validation & application to job search," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-013/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Chen Lian & Yueran Ma & Carmen Wang, 2019. "Low Interest Rates and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Individual Investment Decisions," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(6), pages 2107-2148.
    15. Christian Holzner & Volker Meier & Martin Werding, 2010. "Time Limits in a Two-tier Unemployment Benefit Scheme under Involuntary Unemployment," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 56(2), pages 251-277, June.
    16. Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & David Hume & John Gathergood & George Loewenstein & Neil Stewart, 2023. "At the Top of the Mind: Peak Prices and the Disposition Effect," Discussion Papers 2023-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    17. Hai Long Duong & Junhong Chu & Dai Yao, 2023. "Taxi Drivers’ Response to Cancellations and No-Shows: New Evidence for Reference-Dependent Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 179-199, January.
    18. Samir AMINE, 2017. "Job complexity and wage bargaining," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(610), S), pages 189-196, Spring.
    19. Jin, Miao & Liu, Yu-Jane & Meng, Juanjuan, 2019. "Fat-finger event and risk-taking behavior," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 126-143.
    20. Pietro Garibaldi & Etienne Wasmer, 2005. "Equilibrium Search Unemployment, Endogenous Participation, And Labor Market Flows," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(4), pages 851-882, June.
    21. Stefano Della & Jörg Heining & Johannes F Schmieder & Simon Trenkle, 2023. "Evidence on Job Search Models from a Survey of Unemployed Workers in Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(2), pages 1181-1232.
    22. Pellizzari, Michele, 2006. "Unemployment duration and the interactions between unemployment insurance and social assistance," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 773-798, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03370452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.