[Impacts économiques d'une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux et des produits phytosanitaires en France : analyse en équilibre général]"> [Impacts économiques d'une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux et des produits phytosanitaires en France : analyse en équilibre général]">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02840460.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic impacts of reducing agricultural use of mineral fertilizer in France : a general equilibrium analysis
[Impacts économiques d'une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux et des produits phytosanitaires en France : analyse en équilibre général]

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Gohin

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Herve Guyomard

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Fabrice Levert

    (SMART-LERECO - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AGROCAMPUS OUEST)

  • . Ministère de L'Aménagement Du Territoire Et de L'Environnement, Direction Générale de L'Administration Et Du Développement, Paris (fra)

    (Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement)

  • Francois Bonnieux

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract
L'objectif principal est d'évaluer les conséquences pour l'économie française de politiques de réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux et des produits phytosanitaires. Les politiques considérées sont, d'une part la taxation des engrais minéraux ou des pesticides, d'autre part le quota d'utilisation des engrais minéraux. Les évaluations sont conduites dans un cadre d'équilibre général, le modèle utilisé étant MEGAAF (Modèle d'équilibre général de l'agriculture et de l'agroalimentaire français). Les résultats des différents scénarios montrent qu'une politique de réduction de 15% environ des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux n'aurait, somme toute, que des effets relativement limités sur les allocations des surfaces entre cultures, les offres des productions agricoles, et les prix à la production et à la consommation de divers biens agricoles. Tous les scénarios étudiés aboutissent à une augmentation du bien-être privé, mesuré par la variation équivalente, de l'économie française.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Gohin & Herve Guyomard & Fabrice Levert & . Ministère de L'Aménagement Du Territoire Et de L'Environnement, Direction Générale de L'Administration Et Du Développement, Paris (fra) & Francois, 2000. "Economic impacts of reducing agricultural use of mineral fertilizer in France : a general equilibrium analysis [Impacts économiques d'une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux e," Post-Print hal-02840460, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02840460
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02840460v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02840460v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S Bonny & R Carles, 1993. "Perspectives d'évolution de l'emploi des engrais et des phytosanitaires dans l'agriculture française," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 26, pages 29-62.
    2. Melanie Blackwell & Pagoulatos Angelos, 1992. "The Econometrics of Damage Control," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1040-1044.
    3. Babcock, Bruce A. & Chalfant, James A. & Collender, Robert N., 1987. "Simultaneous Input Demands And Land Allocation In Agricultural Production Under Certainty," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    5. Christensen, Laurits R & Jorgenson, Dale W & Lau, Lawrence J, 1973. "Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(1), pages 28-45, February.
    6. Bharat Ramaswami, 1993. "Supply Response to Agricultural Insurance: Risk Reduction and Moral Hazard Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(4), pages 914-925.
    7. John M. Antle, 1983. "Sequential Decision Making in Production Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 282-290.
    8. David J. Pannell, 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 361-383, August.
    9. Catalina Carrasco-Tauber & L. Joe Moffitt, 1992. "Damage Control Econometrics: Functional Specification and Pesticide Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(1), pages 158-162.
    10. Chamberlain, Gary, 1982. "Multivariate regression models for panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 5-46, January.
    11. Bruce A. Babcock & Erik Lichtenberg & David Zilberman, 1992. "Impact of Damage Control and Quality of Output: Estimating Pest Control Effectiveness," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(1), pages 163-172.
    12. G. H. Wan & J. R. Anderson, 1990. "Estimating Risk Effects In Chinese Foodgrain Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 85-93, January.
    13. Bharat Ramaswami, 1992. "Production Risk and Optimal Input Decisions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 860-869.
    14. Robert Neil Collender & James A. Chalfant, 1986. "An Alternative Approach to Decisions under Uncertainty Using the Empirical Moment-Generating Function," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 727-731.
    15. Mundlak, Yair, 1978. "On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 69-85, January.
    16. John M. Antle & Stephen A. Hatchett, 1986. "Dynamic Input Decisions in Econometric Production Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 939-949.
    17. Antle, John M., 1983. "Sequential Decision Making in Production Models," 1983 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 3, West Lafayette, Indiana 279107, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Sandler, Todd & Sterbenz, Frederic P., 1988. "Externalities, pigouvian corrections, and risk attitudes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 488-504, December.
    19. Carl H. Nelson & Edna T. Loehman, 1987. "Further Toward a Theory of Agricultural Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 523-531.
    20. Prabhu L. Pingali & Gerald A. Carlson, 1985. "Human Capital, Adjustments in Subjective Probabilities, and the Demand for Pest Controls," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 853-861.
    21. Barry T. Coyle, 1992. "Risk Aversion and Price Risk in Duality Models of Production: A Linear Mean-Variance Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 849-859.
    22. ZELLNER, Arnold & KMENTA, Jan & DREZE, Jacques H., 1966. "Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models," LIDAM Reprints CORE 12, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Letort, Elodie & Carpentier, Alain, 2009. "Endogeneity of acreage choices in input allocation equations: implied problems and a solution," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49217, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. B. A. Larson & H. Vroomen, 1991. "Nitrogen, Phosphorus And Land Demands At The Us Regional Level: A Primal Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 354-364, September.
    3. Gautam, Madhur & Ahmed, Mansur, 2019. "Too small to be beautiful? The farm size and productivity relationship in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 165-175.
    4. Serra, Teresa & Zilberman, David & Goodwin, Barry K. & Featherstone, Allen M., 2005. "Effects of Decoupling on the Average and the Variability of Output," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24601, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Mitchell, Paul David, 1999. "The theory and practice of green insurance: insurance to encourage the adoption of corn rootworm IPM," ISU General Staff Papers 1999010108000013154, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Robert G. Chambers & Erik Lichtenberg, 1994. "Simple Econometrics of Pesticide Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(3), pages 407-417.
    7. Kingwell, Ross S., 1992. "The Tactics of Dryland Farm Management given Variance in Climate and Prices," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146536, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Niklas Möhring & Martina Bozzola & Stefan Hirsch & Robert Finger, 2020. "Are pesticides risk decreasing? The relevance of pesticide indicator choice in empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 429-444, May.
    9. Mauro Vigani & Jonas Kathage, 2019. "To Risk or Not to Risk? Risk Management and Farm Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1432-1454, October.
    10. Chambers, Robert G. & Lichtenberg, Erik, 1994. "Pesticide Productivity and Pest Damage in the United States: An Aggregate Analysis," Working Papers 197803, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Zvi Griliches & Jacques Mairesse, 1995. "Production Functions: The Search for Identification," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1719, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    12. Catherine Larochelle & Jeffrey Alwang, 2013. "The Role of Risk Mitigation in Production Efficiency: A Case Study of Potato Cultivation in the Bolivian Andes," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 363-381, June.
    13. Robert G. Chambers & Giannis Karagiannis & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2009. "Yet Another Look at Pest Damage and Pesticide Productivity," Working Papers 0911, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    14. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    15. Giannis Karagiannis & Magnus Kellermann, 2019. "Stochastic frontier models with correlated effects," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 175-187, June.
    16. Jisang Yu & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2020. "Input Use Decisions with Greater Information on Crop Conditions: Implications for Insurance Moral Hazard and the Environment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 826-845, May.
    17. Karagiannis, Giannis & Tsionas, Efthimios & Tzouvelekas, Vangelis, 2005. "Efficiency in Damage Control Inputs: A Stochastic Production Frontier Approach," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24642, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Schoney, R. A., 1990. "An Analysis of Wheat Supply Response Under Risk and Uncertainty," Working Papers 244030, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    19. Alfons Lansink & Elvira Silva, 2004. "Non-Parametric Production Analysis of Pesticides Use in the Netherlands," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 49-65, January.
    20. Yasemin Bal Gunduz & Masyita Crystallin, 2014. "Do IMF-Supported Programs Catalyze Donor Assistance to Low-Income Countries?," IMF Working Papers 2014/202, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environnement; espace et société;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02840460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.