[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331837.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU-China: Win-Win Trade Liberalization and Stimulus Scenarios?

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, David
  • van der Geest, Willem
Abstract
This paper presents three clusters of original simulation exercises, dealing respectively with: i. modest and ambitious bilateral and multi-lateral trade liberalization and its impact on the EU-China trade relation; ii. global current account adjustment scenarios, where China sharply reduces it current account surplus, necessitating symmetric adjustments elsewhere, in particular in the deficit regions such as the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA); and iii. stimulus of the domestic Chinese economy through implementing a huge stimulus package in the context of rapidly falling global demand brought about by the global financial crisis and its severe demand implosion. One scenario super-imposes on the crisis context a sharp reduction of China’s accumulated capital reserves in an attempt to escape the ‘dollar trap’. The EU-China Partnership Cooperation Agreement (PCA) negotiations presently do not include a focus on a free trade agreement between the EU and China. In this sense, the EU-China PCA is distinctly different from e.g. the 2002 EU-Chile agreement, as well as the ongoing negotiations between the EU and ASEAN, India, Korea and the Economic Partnership Agreements between the ACP countries and the EU. One of the key reasons for this is that the EU's trade deficit with China has been growing very fast, in particular since WTO accession in 2001and it has reached historically unprecedented levels in absolute and relative terms. It is widely held that a free trade agreement between the EU and China would further accelerate the growth of the deficit, and that such a growth in the bilateral EU-China trade deficit is undesirable. However, amongst trade economists, it is the over-all impact of trade policy reform on economic welfare in the EU and China that matters, and changes in the bilateral trade balances that result from such policy changes are of importance in relation to trade adjustment costs and benefits. In the case of a free trade agreement between the EU and China, the core of the economic analysis of the impact on economic welfare follows well known lines from Customs Union theory. In the empirical analysis of a free trade agreement between the EU and China, conducted for this paper, trade policy reform includes both tariff and non-tariff trade policy instruments. The application of Customs Union theory is complicated but not superseded by the more complex empirical reality than originally considered by Viner. Section 2 of the paper provides an overview of the GLOBE model: a regional Computable General Equilibrium model in which China and the EU are identified as separate regions (countries). This paper uses an updated version of GLOBE (Evans et al (2008). The section describes the modelling approach, the structural characteristics of China and its place in the global economy and presents the baseline-scenario, against which the three clusters of counter-factual scenarios are compared. Section 3 presents the 17 scenarios which analyze key issues of i) EU-China trade liberalization scenarios, ii) Chinese current account reforms; and iii) the impact of crisis and stimulus. Section 4 present the empirical results at the macro-level, while Annex I provides details at the sector level for imports and exports for the trade liberalization scenarios. The paper argues that for EU-China trade to achieve win-win outcomes in terms of economic welfare, a substantial and asymmetric reduction of non-tariff barriers (NTBs) in the Chinese economy may be necessary. Fresh estimates of the levels of Chinese NTBs are included in the paper and used in the simulations, drawing on research undertaken by Evans et al. (2006) as well as for van der Geest, Evans et al. (2008). The impact of current account adjustments in the Chinese economy on the macroeconomic and trade balances of partner countries and regions is analyzed. Crisis and stimulus – both in OECD and China – are simulated in the context of the global financial crisis and demand contraction. A sharp and sudden reduction of primary factor incomes in OECD economies is analyzed, which reverberates throughout the global economy with a multitude of consequences for the Chinese economy. The conclusions draw out the tentative policy implications for EU-China trade relations in terms of economic welfare and trade adjustment impacts. Liberalization scenarios with a strong focus on the reduction of NTBs in China as well as standard tariff reduction may be the best option towards the much desired win-win scenarios for EU-China trade. However, growth and absorption losses due to the crisis are much larger than any potential gains from trade-liberalization. The current global stimuli do not change that result, indeed it is crucial that the Chinese stimulus package is ‘trade-neutral’ and avoids a bias towards import substitution as well as export subsidization measures. The huge stimulus package implemented within the Chinese economy is part of a win-win scenario, including GDP gains in China and other regions. Preliminary remarks on an emerging research agenda are included.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, David & van der Geest, Willem, 2009. "EU-China: Win-Win Trade Liberalization and Stimulus Scenarios?," Conference papers 331837, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331837/files/4482.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Vos & Marco V. Sánchez & Cornelia Kaldewei, 2010. "Latin America and the Caribbean’s challenge to reach the MDGs: financing options and trade-offs," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Marco V. Sánchez & Rob Vos & Enrique Ganuza & Hans Lofgren & Carolina Díaz-Bonilla (ed.), Public Policies for Human Development, chapter 2, pages 17-69, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Hopkins, Michael & Van der Hoeven, Rolph, 1982. "Policy analysis in a socioeconomic model of basic needs applied to four countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 425-455, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rob Vos & Marco V. Sánchez, 2009. "Impact of the global crisis on the achievement of the MDGs in Latin America," Working Papers 74, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    2. Rob Vos & Marco V. Sánchez & Cornelia Kaldewei, 2010. "Latin America and the Caribbean’s challenge to reach the MDGs: financing options and trade-offs," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Marco V. Sánchez & Rob Vos & Enrique Ganuza & Hans Lofgren & Carolina Díaz-Bonilla (ed.), Public Policies for Human Development, chapter 2, pages 17-69, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Krishna Mazumdar, 2000. "Causal Flow between Human Well-being and per Capita Real Gross Domestic Product," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 297-313, June.
    4. HENK C. Bas, 1983. "Some Simple Thoughts on Model Building for Developing Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 22(2), pages 63-71.
    5. Rodrigue, André, 1986. "La contribution de l’amélioration du bien-être au processus de croissance dans les pays en développement," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 62(1), pages 64-87, mars.
    6. Lofgren, Hans & Cicowiez, Martin & Diaz-Bonilla, Carolina, 2013. "MAMS – A Computable General Equilibrium Model for Developing Country Strategy Analysis," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 159-276, Elsevier.
    7. -, 2008. "Millennium development goals: progress towards the right to health in Latin america and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2919 edited by Eclac.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.