[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v22y2013i3p419-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Sperlich
Abstract
We discuss the following two particular aspects of the paper of González-Manteiga and Crujeiras ( 10.1007/s11749-013-0327-5 ): First, what changes if the null hypothesis is non- or semiparametric? For example, Rodriguez-Poo et al. (A practical test for misspecification in regression: functional form, separability, and distribution. Econom. Theory, 2013 , under revision) considered optimal rates of adaptive nonparametric tests when the null model is semiparametric. A second, though related question is, how serious are the bandwidth and calibration problems? Sperlich (On the choice of regularization parameters in specification testing: a critical discussion. Empir. Econ., 2013 , forthcoming) has shown that the unsolved bandwidth selection problems, in particular when calibrating, render nonparametric specification tests useless in practice. Two additional questions are only raised briefly and concern (a) the computational aspects, and (b) the problem that asymptotically, nonparametric omnibus tests might reject almost any null hypothesis as probably no parametric or semiparametric model is 100 % correct. But it is maybe a reasonable and useful approximation. To this aim we recall the idea of testing the problem of so-called ‘precise hypotheses’ as outlined in Dette (Ann. Stat. 27:1012–1040, 1999 ) for nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests. Copyright Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Sperlich, 2013. "Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 419-427, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:22:y:2013:i:3:p:419-427
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-013-0330-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11749-013-0330-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-013-0330-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Jiti & Gijbels, Irène, 2008. "Bandwidth Selection in Nonparametric Kernel Testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1584-1594.
    2. Davidson, Russell & Flachaire, Emmanuel, 2008. "The wild bootstrap, tamed at last," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 162-169, September.
    3. Manuel Wiesenfarth & Tatyana Krivobokova & Stephan Klasen & Stefan Sperlich, 2012. "Direct Simultaneous Inference in Additive Models and Its Application to Model Undernutrition," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1286-1296, December.
    4. Stefan Sperlich & María José Lombardía, 2010. "Local polynomial inference for small area statistics: estimation, validation and prediction," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 633-648.
    5. Härdle, Wolfgang & Huet, Sylvie & Mammen, Enno & Sperlich, Stefan, 2004. "Bootstrap Inference In Semiparametric Generalized Additive Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 265-300, April.
    6. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1999. "The Size Distortion Of Bootstrap Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 361-376, June.
    7. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Rejoinder on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 265-270, August.
    8. Guerre, Emmanuel & Lavergne, Pascal, 2002. "Optimal Minimax Rates For Nonparametric Specification Testing In Regression Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1139-1171, October.
    9. Hardle W. & Sperlich S. & Spokoiny V., 2001. "Structural Tests in Additive Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1333-1347, December.
    10. Horowitz, Joel L & Spokoiny, Vladimir G, 2001. "An Adaptive, Rate-Optimal Test of a Parametric Mean-Regression Model against a Nonparametric Alternative," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 599-631, May.
    11. Natalie Neumeyer & Stefan Sperlich, 2006. "Comparison of Separable Components in Different Samples," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(3), pages 477-501, September.
    12. Roca-Pardinas, Javier & Sperlich, Stefan, 2007. "Testing the link when the index is semiparametric--a comparative study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6565-6581, August.
    13. Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert, 2010. "Testing Structural Change In Partially Linear Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(6), pages 1761-1806, December.
    14. Sperlich, Stefan & Tjøstheim, Dag & Yang, Lijian, 2002. "Nonparametric Estimation And Testing Of Interaction In Additive Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 197-251, April.
    15. Emmanuel Guerre & Pascal Lavergne, 2004. "Data-Driven Rate-Optimal Specification Testing In Regression Models," Econometrics 0411008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Zhang, Chunming, 2003. "Calibrating the Degrees of Freedom for Automatic Data Smoothing and Effective Curve Checking," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 609-628, January.
    17. Zhang, Chunming & Dette, Holger, 2004. "A power comparison between nonparametric regression tests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 289-301, February.
    18. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 213-239, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Carlos Pardo-Fernández & María Dolores Jiménez-Gamero & Anouar El Ghouch, 2015. "A Non-parametric ANOVA-type Test for Regression Curves Based on Characteristic Functions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 197-213, March.
    2. G. I. Rivas-Martínez & M. D. Jiménez-Gamero & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo, 2019. "A two-sample test for the error distribution in nonparametric regression based on the characteristic function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1369-1395, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    2. Stefan Sperlich, 2014. "On the choice of regularization parameters in specification testing: a critical discussion," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 427-450, September.
    3. Felix Abramovich & Italia Feis & Theofanis Sapatinas, 2009. "Optimal testing for additivity in multiple nonparametric regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(3), pages 691-714, September.
    4. Long Feng & Changliang Zou & Zhaojun Wang & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Robust comparison of regression curves," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 185-204, March.
    5. Andrea Vaona, 2008. "The sensitivity of nonparametric misspecification tests to disturbance autocorrelation," Quaderni della facoltà di Scienze economiche dell'Università di Lugano 0803, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    6. Song Xi Chen & Jiti Gao, 2010. "Simultaneous Testing of Mean and Variance Structures in Nonlinear Time Series Models," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2010-28, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    7. Gonzales Manteiga, Wenceslao & Maria Dolores, Martinez Miranda & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Goodness-of-fit Test in Parametric Mixed-Effects Models based on the Estimation of the Error Distribution," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012022, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Kohtaro Hitomi & Masamune Iwasawa & Yoshihiko Nishiyama, 2023. "Optimal minimax rates of specification testing with data-driven bandwidth," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 487-512, June.
    9. Jing Wang & Lijian Yang, 2009. "Efficient and fast spline-backfitted kernel smoothing of additive models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(3), pages 663-690, September.
    10. Gao, Jiti, 2007. "Nonlinear time series: semiparametric and nonparametric methods," MPRA Paper 39563, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Sep 2007.
    11. de Uña Álvarez, Jacobo & Roca Pardiñas, Javier, 2009. "Additive models in censored regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3490-3501, July.
    12. Qi Li & Jeffrey Scott Racine, 2006. "Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 8355.
    13. Li, Hongjun & Li, Qi & Liu, Ruixuan, 2016. "Consistent model specification tests based on k-nearest-neighbor estimation method," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 187-202.
    14. James G. MacKinnon & Matthew D. Webb & Morten Ø. Nielsen, 2017. "Bootstrap And Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering," Working Paper 1386, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    15. Patrick Saart & Jiti Gao & Nam Hyun Kim, 2014. "Semiparametric methods in nonlinear time series analysis: a selective review," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 141-169, March.
    16. Jia-Young Michael Fu & Joel L. Horowitz & Matthias Parey, 2015. "Testing exogeneity in nonparametric instrumental variables identified by conditional quantile restrictions," CeMMAP working papers 68/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Jácome, M.A. & López-de-Ullibarri, I., 2016. "Bandwidth selection for the presmoothed logrank test," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 151-157.
    18. Emmanuel Flachaire, 2000. "Les méthodes du bootstrap dans les modèles de régression," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 142(1), pages 183-194.
    19. Russell Davidson & James G. MacKinnon, 2015. "Bootstrap Tests for Overidentification in Linear Regression Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-39, December.
    20. Russell Davidson & Victoria Zinde‐Walsh, 2017. "Advances in specification testing," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1595-1631, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:22:y:2013:i:3:p:419-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.