[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i11p2363-2379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick McAllister

    (University College London, UK)

  • Emma Street

    (Reading University, UK)

  • Peter Wyatt

    (Reading University, UK)

Abstract
Over the last decade the English planning system has placed greater emphasis on the financial viability of development. ‘Calculative’ practices have been used to quantify and capture land value uplifts. Development viability appraisal (DVA) has become a key part of the evidence base used in planning decision-making and informs both ‘site-specific’ negotiations about the level of land value capture for individual schemes and ‘area-wide’ planning policy formation. This paper investigates how implementation of DVA is governed in planning policy formation. It is argued that the increased use of DVA raises important questions about how planning decisions are made and operationalised, not least because DVA is often poorly understood by some key stakeholders. The paper uses the concept of governance to thematically analyse semi-structured interviews conducted with the producers of DVAs and considers key procedural issues including (in)consistencies in appraisal practices, levels of stakeholder consultation and the potential for client and producer bias. Whilst stakeholder consultation is shown to be integral to the appraisal process in order to improve the quality of the appraisals and to legitimise the outputs, participation is restricted to industry experts and excludes some interest groups, including local communities. It is concluded that, largely because of its recent adoption and knowledge asymmetries between local planning authorities and appraisers, DVA is a weakly governed process characterised by emerging and contested guidance and is therefore ‘up for grabs’.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2363-2379, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2363-2379
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015589722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015589722
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015589722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Crosby & Pat McAllister & Peter Wyatt, "undated". "Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-10, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    2. Neil Crosby & Colin Lizieri & Patrick McAllister, 2010. "Means, motive and opportunity? Disentangling client influence on performance measurement appraisals," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 181-201, April.
    3. Fligstein, N., 1998. "The politics of quantification," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 325-331, April.
    4. Brett Christophers, 2014. "Wild Dragons in the City: Urban Political Economy, Affordable Housing Development and the Performative World-making of Economic Models," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 79-97, January.
    5. Malgorzata Blicharska & Karolina Isaksson & Tim Richardson & Chia-Jung Wu, 2011. "Context dependency and stakeholder involvement in EIA: the decisive role of practitioners," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 337-354.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    2. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    3. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    4. Erwin Diewert & Chihiro Shimizu, 2020. "Alternative Land‐Price Indexes for Commercial Properties in Tokyo," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 784-824, December.
    5. Irene Cheloti & Manya Mooya, 2021. "Valuation Problems in Developing Countries: A New Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Chihiro Shimizu & W. Erwin Diewert & Kiyohiko G. Nishimura & Tsutomu Watanabe, 2015. "Estimating quality adjusted commercial property price indexes using Japanese REIT data," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 217-239, September.
    7. Huang, Donna & Gilbert, Catherine & Rowley, Steven & Gurran, Nicole & Leishman, Chris & Mouritz, Mike & Raynor, Katrina & Cornell, Christen, 2020. "Urban regulation and diverse housing supply: An Investigative Panel," SocArXiv k49pd, Center for Open Science.
    8. Neil Crosby & Steven Devaney & Colin Lizieri & Patrick McAllister, 2018. "Can Institutional Investors Bias Real Estate Portfolio Appraisals? Evidence from the Market Downturn," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 651-667, February.
    9. Tikkanen, Jukka, 2018. "Participatory turn - and down-turn - in Finland's regional forest programme process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 87-97.
    10. Artioli, Francesca, 2021. "Sale of public land as a financing instrument. The unspoken political choices and distributional effects of land-based solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Alexandru Tugui & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Laura Asandului, 2020. "An Informal Ethics Auditing in Authorized Valuation for Business Sustainability in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    12. W. Erwin Diewert & Kiyohiko G. Nishimura & Chihiro Shimizu & Tsutomu Watanabe, 2020. "The System of National Accounts and Alternative Approaches to the Construction of Commercial Property Price Indexes," Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, in: Property Price Index, chapter 0, pages 181-219, Springer.
    13. Chris Foye, 2022. "Section 106, Viability, And The Depoliticization Of English Land Value Capture Policy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 269-286, March.
    14. Agnieszka Małkowska & Małgorzata Uhruska & Mateusz Tomal, 2019. "Age and Experience versus Susceptibility to Client Pressure among Property Valuation Professionals—Implications for Rethinking Institutional Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Szilveszter Fekete & Andreea Alexandru, 2022. "Factors Influencing Public Higher Education Institutions’ Performance Reporting in the Romanian Context," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Steven Devaney & David Scofield, 2015. "Liquidity and the drivers of search, due diligence and transaction times for UK commercial real estate investments," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 362-383, December.
    17. Hsueh-Fei Liao & Nan-Yu Chu & Chien-Wen Peng, 2018. "Awareness of Independence of Real Estate Appraisers: An Empirical Analysis," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 295-316.
    18. Julio A. Soria-Lara & Luca Bertolini & Marco Te Brömmelstroet, 2017. "Towards a more effective EIA in transport planning: a literature review to derive interventions and mechanisms to improve knowledge integration," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(5), pages 755-772, May.
    19. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 173-199, February.
    20. Blicharska, Malgorzata & Angelstam, Per & Elbakidze, Marine & Axelsson, Robert & Skorupski, Maciej & Węgiel, Andrzej, 2012. "The Polish Promotional Forest Complexes: objectives, implementation and outcomes towards sustainable forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2363-2379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.