[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v119y2022pe2117155119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The societal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from the G7 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Lima de Miranda

    (a Global Cooperation and Social Cohesion, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 24105 Kiel, Germany;; b Socio Economic Transformation Program, The New Institute, 20354 Hamburg, Germany;; c Global Solutions Initiative, 10969 Berlin, Germany;)

  • Dennis J. Snower

    (b Socio Economic Transformation Program, The New Institute, 20354 Hamburg, Germany;; c Global Solutions Initiative, 10969 Berlin, Germany;; d Hertie School of Governance, 10117 Berlin, Germany;; e Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, United Kingdom;; f Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom;; g Global Economy and Development, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC 20036)

Abstract
We examine the effects of the pandemic in terms of normative foundations for societal well-being in terms of Solidarity, Agency, GDP, and Environmental Performance. Our findings show that while G7 countries experienced similar qualitative changes in GDP and environmental performance in 2020, they had markedly divergent experiences with respect to Solidarity and Agency. This has potentially important implications for assessing societal well-being beyond GDP and environmental sustainability. Since Solidarity and Agency are amenable to policy influence, our findings suggest that the current preoccupation with economic policies in response to the pandemic may need to be supplemented by solidarity- and agency-enhancing social policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Lima de Miranda & Dennis J. Snower, 2022. "The societal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from the G7 countries," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(25), pages 2117155119-, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2117155119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/119/25/e2117155119.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. , & Lima de Miranda, Katharina, 2020. "Recoupling Economic and Social Prosperity," CEPR Discussion Papers 14421, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis, 2020. "COVID-19 Is Also a Reallocation Shock," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 51(2 (Summer), pages 329-383.
    3. Dennis J. Snower, 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 8314, CESifo.
    4. ,, 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 14872, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Snower, Dennis J., 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," IZA Policy Papers 162, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Krzysztof Solarz & Krzysztof Waliszewski, 2020. "Holistic Framework for COVID-19 Pandemic as Systemic Risk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 340-351.
    2. Arsena Gjipali & Valbona Karapici & Nevila Baci, 2023. "How Do the Labour Force Characteristics Encounter COVID-19 Economic Consequences—A Canadian Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Santiago Lago-Peñas & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Agnese Sacchi, 2022. "Country performance during the Covid-19 pandemic: externalities, coordination, and the role of institutions," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 17-31, March.
    4. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2021. "Pandemic Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 20401.
    5. Charles A.E. Goodhart & Dimitrios P. Tsomocos & Xuan Wang, 2023. "Support for small businesses amid COVID‐19," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(358), pages 612-652, April.
    6. Miescu, Mirela & Rossi, Raffaele, 2021. "COVID-19-induced shocks and uncertainty," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Basso, Gaetano & Boeri, Tito & Caiumi, Alessandro & Paccagnella, Marco, 2020. "The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation," IZA Discussion Papers 13532, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Carlos Madeira, 2022. "The double impact of deep social unrest and a pandemic: Evidence from Chile," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(S1), pages 135-171, February.
    9. Crossley, Thomas F. & Fisher, Paul & Low, Hamish, 2021. "The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from high quality panel data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Sangeeta Gupta & Poonam Devdutt & Urmila Jagadeeswari Itam, 2022. "Centrality of psychological well-being of IT employees during COVID-19 and beyond," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(4), pages 365-380, December.
    11. Filippos Petroulakis, 2023. "Task Content and Job Losses in the Great Lockdown," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 586-613, May.
    12. Hans-Martin von Gaudecker & Radost Holler & Lena Janys & Bettina Sifinger & Christian Zimpelmann, 2020. "Labour Supply during Lockdown and a “New Normal”: The Case of the Netherlands Abstract: We document the evolution of hours of work using monthly data from February to June 2020. During this period, th," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 025, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    13. Chodorow-Reich, Gabriel & Coglianese, John, 2021. "Projecting unemployment durations: A factor-flows simulation approach with application to the COVID-19 recession," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Mauro Bambi & Daria Ghilli & Fausto Gozzi & Marta Leocata, 2021. "Habits and demand changes after COVID-19," Papers 2107.00909, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    15. Altig, Dave & Baker, Scott & Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nicholas & Bunn, Philip & Chen, Scarlet & Davis, Steven J. & Leather, Julia & Meyer, Brent & Mihaylov, Emil & Mizen, Paul & Parker, Nicholas &, 2020. "Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    17. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    18. Gene Amromin & Jane K. Dokko & Karen E. Dynan, 2020. "Helping Homeowners During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Lessons from the Great Recession," Chicago Fed Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue 443, June.
    19. Morikawa, Masayuki, 2021. "Productivity of firms using relief policies during the COVID-19 crisis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Hoshi, Takeo & Kawaguchi, Daiji & Ueda, Kenichi, 2023. "Zombies, again? The COVID-19 business support programs in Japan," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2117155119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.