[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/010027/10321.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Combining micro- and macroeconomic approach to simulate labour tax wedge cut in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Zachlod-Jelec
  • Magdalena Zachlod-Jelec
  • Anamaria Maftei
  • Jonathan Pycroft
Abstract
The overall tax burden on labour is high in Italy as compared to the EU average. A high marginal labour tax inevitably causes disincentives to work, especially among the lower paid whose labour market participation choices are typically highly responsive to marginal tax rates. In 2014/2015 Italy undertook measures to lower its tax wedge on labour, a key element of which was the introduction of a refundable in-work tax credit of EUR 80 per month for low-income earners. In this paper we study the effects of the abovementioned reform, combining the advantages of the microsimulation model with these of an overlapping generations (OLG) model. This allows us to take advantage of both the detailed, disaggregated information at the micro level and the broader behavioural responses of economic agents at the macro level, providing a broader analysis of the reform than either of the two methodologies in isolation. The microsimulation model used is EUROMOD, a tax-benefit model for EU countries. EUROMOD simulates benefit entitlements and tax liabilities of individual and households according to the tax-benefit rules in place in each Member State. The simulations are based on representative survey data from the European Statistics on Income and Living Conditions – EU-SILC (a full description of the EUROMOD model is available in Sutherland, 2007). To get labour supply response we make use of a structural discrete choice labour supply model (as in Bargain, Orsini, and Peichl, 2014) that has been estimated using the microsimulation model EUROMOD and EU-SILC household data. The macroeconomic model is an overlapping generations dynamic general equilibrium model. The household sector consists of several generations living alongside each other at any point in time, who make labour, consumption and savings choices so as to optimise their lifetime utility. On the supply side, firms maximise profits generated from the production of a single good. Government collects revenues from taxes on consumption, labour and capital which are used to finance spending on public consumption and transfer payments to different generations. A calibration procedure based on micro data has been applied to the OLG model for Italy. We calibrate earnings profiles and consumption profiles by age using EUROMOD. Taking exogenous consumption profiles implies that the discount rates in the model are time-varying. We match the labour elasticities estimated using micro-data to the more aggregated individual agents of our OLG model producing our labour supply curve. The simulation can be split into three components: (i) the static microsimulation effects, (ii) the microsimulation effects with the labour supply response, and (iii) the dynamic macroeonomic consequences. The static microsimulation using the standard EUROMOD version shows the first-round effects by individual worker (in the EU-SILC data), which is aggregated to show the impacts by household categories. First-round effects have been recently analysed in Astarita, Maestri and Schmitz (2016). The second step is to incorporate the labour supply response in the microsimulation model, which provides a partial picture of the impact on employment of the policy. The final stage, using the OLG model, addresses the long-run dynamic macroeconomic consequences, including relaxing the assumption of unchanged GDP (a core contribution of the dynamic scoring approach; for example, see Gravelle, 2014). Of particular interest to this study is the labour demand response to the policy reform. The preliminary results are split into the three methodological components. The static microsimulation shows that the policy improves equity outcomes as it is focused on low paid workers. Nevertheless when aggregated to the household level, a fair portion of the benefits go to higher income households where the second income earner is low paid. The tax revenue loss at this stage can be considered an overestimate as the behavioural responses are believed to act to reduce the loss. The labour supply extension of the microsimulation model suggests that a significant increase in employment can be anticipated due to the cuts in the marginal labour tax rates. This has direct impacts on the public finances by reducing expenditures on unemployment benefits and increasing income tax revenues. By design the labour supply in the OLG model mimics that of the extension to the microsimulation model, with individuals working more in the present to save and have more leisure in the future. This in turn increases savings and capital stock over the long run. The labour demand also rises over time, which further raises employment. This key finding that keeping labour demand fixed underestimates the employment effects, while keeping labour supply fixed overestimates them, demonstrates the importance of combining microsimulation and general equilibrium models to examine policy reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Zachlod-Jelec & Magdalena Zachlod-Jelec & Anamaria Maftei & Jonathan Pycroft, 2017. "Combining micro- and macroeconomic approach to simulate labour tax wedge cut in Italy," EcoMod2017 10321, EcoMod.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Zachlod_Jelec_Combining%20micro%20and%20macro%20approach_paper_final_June.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zodrow, George R. & Diamond, John W., 2013. "Dynamic Overlapping Generations Computable General Equilibrium Models and the Analysis of Tax Policy: The Diamond–Zodrow Model," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 743-813, Elsevier.
    2. Olivier Bargain & Kristian Orsini & Andreas Peichl, 2012. "Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US: New Results," Working Papers halshs-00805736, HAL.
    3. Olivier Bargain & Kristian Orsini & Andreas Peichl, 2014. "Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the United States: New Results," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 49(3), pages 723-838.
    4. Giulia Colombo, 2010. "Linking CGE and microsimulation models: a comparison of different approaches," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 3(1), pages 72-91.
    5. Andreas Peichl, 2009. "The Benefits and Problems of Linking Micro and Macro Models — Evidence from a Flat Tax Analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 301-329, November.
    6. Holly Sutherland & Francesco Figari, 2013. "EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 1(6), pages 4-26.
    7. Mérette Marcel & Georges Patrick, 2010. "Demographic Changes and the Gains from Globalisation: An Analysis of Ageing, Capital Flows, and International Trade," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salvador Barrios & Mathias Dolls & Anamaria Maftei & Andreas Peichl & Sara Riscado & Janos Varga & Christian Wittneben, 2019. "Dynamic Scoring Of Tax Reforms In The European Union," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 239-262, January.
    2. Bart Capéau & André Decoster & Stijn Van Houtven, 2024. "Piecemeal Modeling of the Effects of Joint Direct and Indirect Tax Reforms," Public Finance Review, , vol. 52(1), pages 111-149, January.
    3. Andreas Peichl, 2016. "Linking Microsimulation and CGE models," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(1), pages 167-174.
    4. Michal Horvath & Matus Senaj & Zuzana Siebertova & Norbert Svarda, 2015. "The End of the Flat Tax Experiment in Slovakia," Discussion Papers 15/12, Department of Economics, University of York.
    5. Jörg Paetzold & Markus Tiefenbacher, 2018. "Distributional and revenue effects of a tax shift from labor to property," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1215-1251, October.
    6. Löffler, Max & Peichl, Andreas & Pestel, Nico & Siegloch, Sebastian & Sommer, Eric, 2014. "Documentation IZA?MOD v3.0: The IZA Policy Simulation Model," IZA Discussion Papers 8553, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Klára Kalíšková, 2020. "Tax and transfer policies and the female labor supply in the EU," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 749-775, February.
    8. Mathias Dolls & Karina Doorley & Alari Paulus & Hilmar Schneider & Sebastian Siegloch & Eric Sommer, 2017. "Fiscal sustainability and demographic change: a micro-approach for 27 EU countries," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(4), pages 575-615, August.
    9. Michael Christl & Silvia De Poli & Janos Varga, 2022. "Reducing the income tax burden for households with children: an assessment of the child tax credit reform in Austria," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 151-177, June.
    10. Salvador Barrios & Flavia Coda Moscarola & Francesco Figari & Luca Gandullia, 2020. "Size and distributional pattern of pension-related tax expenditures in European countries," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(5), pages 1287-1320, October.
    11. Dieter Vandelannoote & Gerlinde Verbist, 2016. "The design of in-work benefits: how to boost employment and combat poverty in Belgium," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/15, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    12. Kalíšková, Klára, 2015. "Tax and transfer policies and female labor supply in the EU," EUROMOD Working Papers EM1/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Charlotte Bartels & Cortnie Shupe, 2023. "Drivers of participation elasticities across Europe: gender or earner role within the household?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(1), pages 167-214, February.
    14. Benczúr, Péter & Kátay, Gábor & Kiss, Áron, 2018. "Assessing the economic and social impact of tax and benefit reforms: A general-equilibrium microsimulation approach applied to Hungary," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 441-457.
    15. Estévez Schwarz, Diana & Sommer, Eric, 2018. "Smooth income tax schedules: derivation and consequences," EUROMOD Working Papers EM11/18, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    16. Agathe Simon, 2022. "The impact of a European unemployment benefit scheme on labor supply and income distribution," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 14, Stata Users Group.
    17. Mathias Dolls & Karina Doorley & Alari Paulus & Hilmar Schneider & Eric Sommer, 2019. "Demographic change and the European income distribution," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(3), pages 337-357, September.
    18. Salvador Barrios & Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė & Anamaria Maftei & Edlira Narazani & Janos Varga, 2020. "Progressive Tax Reforms in Flat Tax Countries," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 83-107, March.
    19. Diego Collado & Bea Cantillon & Karel Van den Bosch & Tim Goedemé & Dieter Vandelannoote, 2016. "The end of cheap talk about poverty reduction: the cost of closing the poverty gap while maintaining work incentives," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/08, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    20. Marian Fink & Jitka Janová & Danuše Nerudová & Jan Pavel & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger & Friedrich Sindermann & Martin Spielauer, 2019. "Policy Recommendations on the Gender Effects of Changes in Tax Bases, Rates, and Units. Results of Microsimulation Analyses for Six Selected EU Member Countries," WIFO Working Papers 578, WIFO.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.