[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/20-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Elementary Humanomics Approach to Boundedly Rational Quadratic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Campbell
  • Vernon L. Smith

    (Chapman University)

Abstract
We take a refreshing new look at boundedly rational quadratic models in economics using some elementary modeling of the principles put forward in the book Humanomics by Vernon L. Smith and Bart J. Wilson. A simple model is introduced built on the fundamental Humanomics principles of gratitude/resentment felt and the corresponding action responses of reward /punishment in the form of higher/lower payo transfers. There are two timescales: one for strictly self-interested action, as in economic equilibrium, and another governed by feelings of gratitude/resentment. One of three timescale scenarios is investigated: one where gratitude /resentment changes much more slowly than economic equilibrium (“quenched model†). Another model, in which economic equilibrium occurs over a much slower time than gratitude /resentment evolution (“annealed†model) is set up, but not investigated. The quenched model with homogeneous interactions turns out to be a non-frustrated spin-glass model. A twoagent quenched model with heterogeneous aligning (ferromagnetic) interactions is analyzed and yields new insights into the critical quenched probability p (1 􀀀 p) that represents the empirical frequency of opportunity for agent i to take action for the benefit (hurt) of other that invokes mutual gratitude (resentment). A critical quenched probability p i , i = 1; 2, exists for each agent. When p p i , agent i will take action sensitive to their interpersonal feelings of gratitude/resentment and thus reward/punish the initiating benefit/hurt. We find that the p i are greater than one-half, which implies agents are averse to resentful behavior and punishment. This was not built into the model, but is a result of its properties, and consistent with Axiom 4 in Humanomics about the asymmetry of gratitude and resentment. Furthermore, the agent who receives less payo is more averse to resentful behavior; i.e., has a higher critical quenched probability. For this particular model, the Nash equilibrium has no predictive power of Humanomics properties since the rewards are the same for self-interested behavior, resentful behavior, and gratitude behavior. Accordingly, we see that the boundedly rational Gibbs equilibrium does indeed lead to richer properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Campbell & Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "An Elementary Humanomics Approach to Boundedly Rational Quadratic Models," Working Papers 20-35, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. Carfí, David & Musolino, Francesco, 2014. "Speculative and hedging interaction model in oil and U.S. dollar markets with financial transaction taxes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 306-319.
    3. repec:srs:journl:volume:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:4-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:srs:volume:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:7-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:srs:journl:volume:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:7-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. , & , P., 2014. "Refinements of Nash equilibrium in potential games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), September.
    7. Campbell, Michael J. & Smith, Vernon L., 2021. "An elementary humanomics approach to boundedly rational quadratic models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    8. William A. Brock & Steven N. Durlauf, 2001. "Discrete Choice with Social Interactions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 68(2), pages 235-260.
    9. Simon P. Anderson & Jacob K. Goeree & Charles A. Holt, 2004. "Noisy Directional Learning and the Logit Equilibrium," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 106(3), pages 581-602, October.
    10. Binmore, Ken & Samuelson, Larry, 1997. "Muddling Through: Noisy Equilibrium Selection," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 235-265, June.
    11. Jackson, Matthew O. & Zenou, Yves, 2015. "Games on Networks," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    12. Joseph Johnson & Gerard J. Tellis & Deborah J. Macinnis, 2005. "Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 324-329, September.
    13. Michael CAMPBELL, 2016. "Inevitability of Collusion in a Coopetitive Bounded Rational Cournot Model with Increasing Demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics and Finance, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 7-20.
    14. Simon P. Anderson & Jacob K. Goeree & Charles A. Holt, 2002. "The Logit Equilibrium: A Perspective on Intuitive Behavioral Anomalies," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 69(1), pages 21-47, July.
    15. Chih-Sheng Hsieh & Michael D. König & Xiaodong Liu, 2012. "Network formation with local complements and global substitutes: the case of R&D networks," ECON - Working Papers 217, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2017.
    16. David CARFÌ & Michael CAMPBELL, 2015. "Bounded Rational Speculative and Hedging Interaction Model in Oil and U S Dollar Markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics and Finance, ASERS Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 4-28.
    17. repec:srs:volume:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:4-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Campbell, Michael J. & Smith, Vernon L., 2021. "An elementary humanomics approach to boundedly rational quadratic models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    2. Koundouri, Phoebe & Dellis, Konstantinos & Miziaki, Olympia, 2024. "The multi-faceted effects of green innovation in the crop & livestock sector in Greece: Evidence with the FABLE Calculator," MPRA Paper 121430, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Campbell, Michael J., 2022. "Heavy-tailed distributions of volume and price-change resulting from strategy coordination and decision noise," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Michael, 2020. "Speculative and hedging interaction model in oil and U.S. dollar markets—Long-term investor dynamics and phases," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    2. Campbell, Michael J., 2022. "Heavy-tailed distributions of volume and price-change resulting from strategy coordination and decision noise," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    3. Xuanming Su, 2008. "Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 566-589, May.
    4. Yann Bramoullé & Habiba Djebbari & Bernard Fortin, 2020. "Peer Effects in Networks: A Survey," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 603-629, August.
    5. Norman, Thomas W.L., 2009. "Rapid evolution under inertia," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 865-879, July.
    6. Mercure, Jean-François, 2018. "Fashion, fads and the popularity of choices: Micro-foundations for diffusion consumer theory," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 194-207.
    7. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2021. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    8. Azomahou, T. & Opolot, D., 2014. "Stability and strategic diffusion in networks," MERIT Working Papers 2014-035, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Marcin Dziubinski & Jaideep Roy, 2007. "Endogenous Selection of Aspiring and Rational rules in Coordination Games," CEDI Discussion Paper Series 07-14, Centre for Economic Development and Institutions(CEDI), Brunel University.
    10. Dagsvik, John K., 2020. "Equilibria in Logit Models of Social Interaction and Quantal Response Equilibrium," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2020:5, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme, revised 09 Mar 2023.
    11. Myatt, David P. & Wallace, Chris C., 2004. "Adaptive play by idiosyncratic agents," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 124-138, July.
    12. Katharina Dowling & Daniel Guhl & Daniel Klapper & Martin Spann & Lucas Stich & Narine Yegoryan, 2020. "Behavioral biases in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 449-477, May.
    13. Pantelis P. Analytis & Francesco Cerigioni & Alexandros Gelastopoulos & Hrvoje Stojic, 2022. "Sequential Choice and Self-Reinforcing Rankings," Working Papers 1318, Barcelona School of Economics.
    14. Thomas Norman, 2010. "Cycles versus equilibrium in evolutionary games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 167-182, August.
    15. Wilfried Anicet Kouamé, 2015. "Tax Morale and Trust in Public Institutions," Cahiers de recherche 15-14, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke, revised Oct 2017.
    16. Topa, Giorgio & Zenou, Yves, 2015. "Neighborhood and Network Effects," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 561-624, Elsevier.
    17. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," Papers 1912.06346, arXiv.org.
    18. Gabriel Galand, 2009. "The Neutrality of Money Revisited with a Bottom-Up Approach: Decentralisation, Limited Information and Bounded Rationality," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 337-360, May.
    19. repec:unm:unumer:2014036 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Yann Bramoullé & Rachel Kranton, 2015. "Games Played on Networks," AMSE Working Papers 1530, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    21. Yoshimasa Katayama & Satoshi Nakada & Taishi Sassano, 2017. "Evolutionary Implementation of Efficient Networks," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 2149-2161.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.