[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/27460.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Teilstudie 21: Umweltpolitik als Teil einer Wachstumsstrategie

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Köppl
  • Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig

    (WIFO)

  • Kurt Kratena

    (WIFO)

  • Ina Meyer
Abstract
Umweltpolitik als Teil einer Wachstumsstrategie konzentriert sich auf jene Fragestellungen, die Strukturveränderungen in Richtung einer umweltgerechten Entwicklung unterstützen. Die Analyse identifiziert Ansatzpunkte für eine Integration von Umweltpolitik in andere Politikbereiche, etwa in die Technologie- und Forschungspolitik, die Energie- sowie die Verkehrspolitik. Umweltpolitik erscheint damit zunehmend als ein zentraler Ansatzpunkt einer Wachstums- und Beschäftigungsstrategie. Die positiven Effekte umweltpolitischer Strategien ergeben sich einerseits indirekt aus dem Vermeiden negativer externer Effekte (Verminderung von ökologischen Reparaturkosten und anderen volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten wie etwa Gesundheitskosten) und andererseits durch direkte positive Wachstums- und Beschäftigungseffekte im Bereich der Umwelttechnologiebranche. Eine wesentliche Rolle kommt dabei energiebezogenen Strategien zu (vor allem Energieeffizienz, erneuerbare Energie), die einerseits zur Verringerung negativer ökologischer Auswirkungen beitragen (anthropogener Klimawandel, Emissionen anderer Luftschadstoffe) und andererseits über die Stärkung der Versorgungssicherheit und die Reduzierung der Abhängigkeit von importierten fossilen Energieträgern einen Beitrag zur Verbesserung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Wirtschaft leisten.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Köppl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer, 2006. "Teilstudie 21: Umweltpolitik als Teil einer Wachstumsstrategie," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27460.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:27460
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/27460
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rennings, Klaus & Ziegler, Andreas, 2004. "Determinants of Environmental Innovations in Germany: Do Organizational Measures Matter? A Discrete Choice Analysis at the Firm Level," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-30, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Popp David, 2005. "Uncertain R&D and the Porter Hypothesis," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, June.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Kivimaa, Paula & Mickwitz, Per, 2006. "The challenge of greening technologies--Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 729-744, June.
    5. Manuel Frondel & Jens Horbach & Klaus Rennings, 2007. "End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 571-584, December.
    6. Jens Horbach, 2003. "Employment and Innovations in the Environmental Sector: Determinants and Econometrical Results for Germany," Working Papers 2003.47, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Wysokinska Zofia Maria, 2005. "Foreign Trade in Environmental Products; The WTO Regulations and Environmental Programs," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Birgit Friedl & Karl Steininger, 2002. "Environmentally Sustainable Transport: Definition and Long-Term Economic Impacts for Austria," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 163-180, June.
    9. Greenaway, David & Hine, Robert C. & Wright, Peter, 1999. "An empirical assessment of the impact of trade on employment in the United Kingdom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 485-500, September.
    10. Margarete Czerny & Kurt Kratena & Angela Köppl & Michael Weingärtler, 2002. "Makroökonomische Wirkungen energiesparender Sanierungsinvestitionen im Wohnbau," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 21918, March.
    11. Michael Landesmann & Sebastian Leitner & Robert Stehrer, 2001. "Trade Liberalization and Labour Markets: Perspective from OECD Economies," wiiw Working Papers 20, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    12. Horbach, Jens & Blien, Uwe & von Hauf, Michael, 2001. "Beschäftigung im Umweltsektor in Deutschland Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels," IWH Discussion Papers 132/2001, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    13. Adam Jaffe & Richard Newell & Robert Stavins, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Technological Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 41-70, June.
    14. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 2004. "2004 Annual Report," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2007. "WIFO-Weißbuch: Wachstumsimpulse durch die öffentliche Hand," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 80(6), pages 509-526, June.
    2. Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl, 2009. "Österreichische Umwelttechnikindustrie. Entwicklung – Schwerpunkte – Innovationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 35119, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl, 2009. "Österreichische Umwelttechnikindustrie: Entwicklung – Schwerpunkte – Innovationen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 82(7), pages 539-554, July.
    2. del Río González, Pablo, 2009. "The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 861-878, January.
    3. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Zoboli, Roberto, 2007. "Environmental Efficiency, Emission Trends and Labour Productivity: Trade-Off or Joint Dynamics? Empirical Evidence Using NAMEA Panel Data," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 9320, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Davide Antonioli & Francesco Nicolli & Marianna Gilli, 2013. "Information Technology, Environmental Innovations and Complementarity Strategies," Working Papers 2013132, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    5. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    6. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2013. "Towards a more comprehensive policy mix conceptualization for environmental technological change: A literature synthesis," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S3/2013, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    8. Jang-Hwan Jo & Tae Woo Roh & Seonghoon Kim & Yeo-Chang Youn & Mi Sun Park & Ki Joo Han & Eun Kyung Jang, 2015. "Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Frondel, Manuel & Horbach, Jens & Rennings, Klaus, 2008. "What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 153-160, May.
    10. Moriah Bostian & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf & Tommy Lundgren, 2022. "Prevention or cure? Optimal abatement mix," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(4), pages 503-531, October.
    11. Manuel Frondel & Jens Horbach & Klaus Rennings, 2007. "End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 571-584, December.
    12. Höglinger, Christoph & Sinozic, Tanja & Tödtling, Franz, 2012. "Emergence, growth and transformation in local clusters - Environmental industries in the region of Upper Austria," SRE-Discussion Papers 2012/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Onaran, Özlem, 2008. "The effect of import penetration on labor market outcomes in Austrian manufacturing industry," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 119, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Angela Köppl, 2006. "The Austrian Environmental Industry. Summary of Results," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 26136.
    15. Martin Falk & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2005. "Employment Effects of Outsourcing to Low Wage Countries. Empirical Evidence for EU Countries," WIFO Working Papers 262, WIFO.
    16. Apergis, Nicholas & Eleftheriou, Sofia & Payne, James E., 2013. "The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: Evidence from European manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-66.
    17. Dilek Cetindamar, 2007. "Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of The United Nations Global Compact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 163-176, December.
    18. Vanessa Oltra, 2008. "Environmental innovation and industrial dynamics: the contributions of evolutionary economics," Post-Print hal-00391493, HAL.
    19. Hanna Hottenrott & Sascha Rexh�user, 2015. "Policy-Induced Environmental Technology and Inventive Efforts: Is There a Crowding Out?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 375-401, July.
    20. Vanessa OLTRA & Maïder SAINT JEAN, 2009. "Environmental Innovations and Industrial Dynamics (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2009-22, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:27460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.