Author
AbstractUrbanism is ubiquitous in our lives. We live it every day, we perceive it whatever we undertake. We run into him when we go shopping, when we go to work, college, school or the park. We surround ourselves and carry out our activity surrounded by it. It is the everyday context and background. We often use a set of words that describe the feelings we have when we interact with places or cities. We say that we like city X, love area Y, or even hate or hate a house or a building. Thus, what we feel is determined by what we perceive: harmony, contrast, balance, dynamics, the elements that make the whole functional. Another criterion is the aesthetic sense and the representation of beauty (or why not, of the grotesque) in the eyes of the beholder, who absorbs. Good or appropriate urbanism is what encourages us to make these connections, to make our experiences not only pleasant, but also practical. Educated imagination is a key element. In parallel, mathematics, objective analysis and functional principles make us expand our range of possibilities for perfecting the framework in which we exist. The beginning of the 21st century finds the urban universe at the confluences of the cultural, social, political and economic currents specific to this period of development and communication unprecedented in the history of humanity. The need to physically organize the functional units of the settlements is ingeniously solved from the dawn of civilization, there is undisputed archaeological evidence in this regard. Gradually, during the evolution, more and more elaborate structures appeared, meant to streamline and harmonize both the infrastructure and the constructions inside the localities. Although coagulated as a science for about a hundred years, a relatively short period compared to the millennial development of architecture - a complementary field, resonating in the cultural area -, it reveals an undeniable importance in the new landmarks of modern life.
Suggested Citation
Alexandra IANCU, 2020.
"The importance of intelligent urbanism,"
Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 37-45, November.
Handle:
RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:37-45
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:37-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.