[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v21y2018i3p231-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russia’s centralized authoritarianism in the disguise of democratic federalism: Evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections

Author

Listed:
  • Grigorii V Golosov
Abstract
While formally a federation that vests significant powers in the sub-national bodies of government and leaves it for its federal units and municipalities to decide who will govern them by conducting elections, the Russian Federation is effectively a centralized authoritarian state. This paper uses evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections in Russia to examine the role of formal political institutions in sustaining the country’s political regime. The analysis shows that the political domination of the pro-government party over the regional political assemblies is sustained by a complex combination of party regulations and electoral rules. In particular, gubernatorial elections are organized and conducted in a way that ensures the victories of the incumbent governors who are effectively appointed by the president of Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Grigorii V Golosov, 2018. "Russia’s centralized authoritarianism in the disguise of democratic federalism: Evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(3), pages 231-248, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:21:y:2018:i:3:p:231-248
    DOI: 10.1177/2233865918789521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2233865918789521
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2233865918789521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Bader & Carolien van Ham, 2015. "What explains regional variation in election fraud? Evidence from Russia: a research note," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 514-528, November.
    2. Vladimir Gel'man, 2015. "Political Opposition in Russia: A Troubled Transformation," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(2), pages 177-191, February.
    3. Oka, Natsuko, 2009. "Ethnicity and Elections under Authoritarianism: The Case of Kazakhstan," IDE Discussion Papers 194, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    4. Helge Blakkisrud, 2011. "Medvedev's New Governors," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 367-395.
    5. Petr Panov & Cameron Ross, 2013. "Sub-National Elections in Russia: Variations in United Russia's Domination of Regional Assemblies," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(4), pages 737-752.
    6. Grigorii V. Golosov, 2015. "The idiosyncratic dynamics of party system nationalization in Russia," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 397-419, September.
    7. Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, 2010. "Subnational Governance in Russia: How Putin Changed the Contract with His Agents and the Problems It Created for Medvedev," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 672-696, Fall.
    8. Vladimir Gel'man, 2004. "The unrule of law in the making: The politics of informal institution building in Russia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 1021-1040.
    9. Nikolay Petrov & Maria Lipman & Henry E. Hale, 2014. "Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Grigorii V. Golosov & Kristina Gushchina & Pavel Kononenko, 2016. "Russia’s local government in the process of authoritarian regime transformation: incentives for the survival of local democracy," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 507-526, July.
    11. J. Tyler Dickovick, 2007. "Municipalization as Central Government Strategy: Central-Regional-Local Politics in Peru, Brazil, and South Africa," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koenig, Christoph, 2019. "Patronage and Election Fraud: Insights from Russia’s Governors 2000–2012," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 433, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. Koenig, Christoph, 2015. "Competence vs. Loyalty: Political survival and electoral fraud in Russia’s regions 2000–2012," Economic Research Papers 270014, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    3. Ananyev, Maxim & Poyker, Michael, 2022. "Do dictators signal strength with electoral fraud?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Michael Rochlitz, 2016. "Political Loyalty Vs Economic Performance: Evidence from Machine Politics in Russia’S Regions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 34/PS/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel, 2020. "A theory of informational autocracy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Michael K Miller, 2013. "Electoral authoritarianism and democracy: A formal model of regime transitions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 25(2), pages 153-181, April.
    7. André Schultz & Alexander Libman, 2015. "Is there a local knowledge advantage in federations? Evidence from a natural experiment," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 25-42, January.
    8. Gerti SQAPI, 2019. "Stateness before democracy? A theoretical perspective for centrality of stateness in the democratization process: The case of Albania," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 45-65, June.
    9. Kravtsova, Maria & Libman, Alexander, 2023. "Historical family structure as a predictor of liberal voting: Evidence from a century of Russian history," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    10. Fenja Søndergaard Møller, 2019. "Blue blood or true blood: Why are levels of intrastate armed conflict so low in Middle Eastern monarchies?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 517-544, September.
    11. Sofya Glazunova, 2020. "‘Four Populisms’ of Alexey Navalny: An Analysis of Russian Non-Systemic Opposition Discourse on YouTube," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 121-132.
    12. De Haan, Jakob & Ohnsorge, Franziska & Yu, Shu, 2023. "Election-induced fiscal policy cycles in emerging market and developing economies," CEPR Discussion Papers 18708, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Mariam Mufti, 2018. "What Do We Know about Hybrid Regimes after Two Decades of Scholarship?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 112-119.
    14. Wahman, Michael & Basedau, Matthias, 2015. "Electoral Rentierism? The Cross-National and Subnational Effect of Oil on Electoral Competitiveness in Multiparty Autocracies," GIGA Working Papers 272, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. Sultan Juma Kakuba, 2021. "State Repression and Democratic Dispensation in Uganda 1996–2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    16. Dmitry I. Ivanov & Alexander S. Nesterov, 2019. "Stealed-bid Auctions: Detecting Bid Leakage via Semi-Supervised Learning," Papers 1903.00261, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    17. Janet Elise Johnson & Alexandra Novitskaya & Valerie Sperling & Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, 2021. "Mixed signals: what Putin says about gender equality," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 507-525, November.
    18. Gerschewski, Johannes, 2020. "Persistenz – Kontinuität – Adaptivität: Konzeptionen politischer Stabilität in der Vergleichenden Autokratieforschung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48(Sonderban), pages 21-38.
    19. Schlumberger, Oliver, 2021. "Puzzles of political change in the Middle East: Political liberalisation, authoritarian resilience and the question of systemic change," IDOS Discussion Papers 5/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. Bautista, María Angélica & González, Felipe & Martinez, Luis R. & Muñoz, Pablo & Prem, Mounu, 2020. "Dictatorship, Higher Education, and Social Mobility," SocArXiv 6st9r, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:21:y:2018:i:3:p:231-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.