[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr2017_013b.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) and the Rule of Law in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Takayuki Nagato

    (Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Gakushuin University)

Abstract
This article analyzes the role and function of a general anti-avoidance (or anti-abuse) rule (GAAR) in the context of Japan, which is one of the rare countries without a statutory GAAR. Such an analysis is needed because some commentators in recent years have strongly argued for the introduction of a GAAR. This article focuses on the relationship between the international debate and the internal Japanese debate on tax avoidance and a GAAR. The main arguments of this article are the following two points. First, unlike the recent arguments, it is not logically accurate to connect the current debate on the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project of the OECD/G20, or other international tax policy debates on aggressive tax planning (ATP), directly to the introduction of a GAAR into Japan fs tax law. Second, the recent evaluation that argues that the academic debate on tax avoidance in Japan is glagging, h once we reexamine it, is an overstatement. This article asserts that it should not be taken for granted that a discussion introducing a process to legislate a GAAR in Japan fs domestic tax law, if it once got started, allows tax authorities and courts to disallow tax avoidance more easily; rather, even if it were to be introduced, it is possible and even favorable to introduce a statutory GAAR as a ggeneral anti-avoidance rule without limitation in scope of application h simply to confirm and clarify the current case law doctrines and the interpretations of existing quasi-GAARs. After that, complementary arguments on a GAAR design follow.

Suggested Citation

  • Takayuki Nagato, 2017. "A General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) and the Rule of Law in Japan," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 13(1), pages 35-70, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr2017_013b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/fy2017/ppr2017_013b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihir A Desai & Dhammika Dharmapala, 2009. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(3), pages 537-546, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oguzhan Akgun & David Bartolini & Boris Cournède, 2017. "The capacity of governments to raise taxes," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1407, OECD Publishing.
    2. García-Meca, Emma & Ramón-Llorens, Maria-Camino & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer, 2021. "Are narcissistic CEOs more tax aggressive? The moderating role of internal audit committees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 223-235.
    3. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu, 2024. "Total factor productivity and tax avoidance: An asymmetric micro-data analysis for European oil and gas companies," Working Papers 2024.15, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    4. Xuefeng Shao & Shi Chen, 2024. "Research on Tax Compliance Incentive Effects of Platform Companies from the Perspective of Incomplete Contract – An Empirical Study Based on China," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 330-330, February.
    5. Feng, Zhi-Yuan & Wang, Ying-Chieh & Wang, Wen-Gine, 2024. "Corporate carbon reduction and tax avoidance: International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2).
    6. Chuanlu Ge & Yuhan Bi & Jia Xu, 2024. "Local donation culture and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 734-763, July.
    7. Sebastien Bradley & Estelle Dauchy & Makoto Hasegawa, 2018. "Investor valuations of Japan’s adoption of a territorial tax regime: quantifying the direct and competitive effects of international tax reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 581-630, June.
    8. Chyz, James A. & Ching Leung, Winnie Siu & Zhen Li, Oliver & Meng Rui, Oliver, 2013. "Labor unions and tax aggressiveness," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 675-698.
    9. Kager, Rebekka & Niemann, Rainer, 2011. "Reconstruction of tax balance sheets based on IFRS information: A case study of listed companies within Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 120, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    10. Shams, Syed & Bose, Sudipta & Gunasekarage, Abeyratna, 2022. "Does corporate tax avoidance promote managerial empire building?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    11. Behnam Karamshahi & Zeinab Azami & Tabandeh Salehi, 2018. "The association between competition power in markets and tax avoidance: evidence from Tehran stock exchange," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 323-339, September.
    12. Choy, Siu Kai & Lai, Tat-Kei & Ng, Travis, 2017. "Do tax havens create firm value?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 198-220.
    13. Jordi Caballé & Ariadna Dumitrescu, 2016. "Disclosure of Corporate Tax Reports, Tax Enforcement, and Insider Trading," Working Papers 911, Barcelona School of Economics.
    14. Athira, A. & Ramesh, Vishnu K., 2023. "COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    15. Bilicka, Katarzyna & Scur, Daniela, 2024. "Organizational capacity and profit shifting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    16. Jeffrey L. Coles & Elena Patel & Nathan Seegert & Matthew Smith, 2022. "How Do Firms Respond to Corporate Taxes?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 965-1006, June.
    17. Müller, Raphael & Spengel, Christoph & Weck, Stefan, 2021. "How do investors value the publication of tax information? Evidence from the European public country-by-country reporting," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-077, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Koethenbuerger, Marko & Stimmelmayr, Michael, 2016. "Taxing multinationals in the presence of internal capital markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 58-71.
    19. Douglas Cumming & Jun Hu & Huiying Wu, 2024. "Leaving a Legacy for my Children: The One-Child Policy Reform and Engagement in CSR Among Family Firms in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 611-632, September.
    20. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Blouin, Jennifer L. & Jagolinzer, Alan D. & Larcker, David F., 2015. "Corporate Governance, Incentives, and Tax Avoidance," Research Papers 2134, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disallowance of tax avoidance; aggressive tax planning; GAAR; tax morality; cooperative compliance; tax corporate governance; BEPS; EU; limitative interpretation doctrine; Yahoo Japan/IDCF cases;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr2017_013b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.