[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i1p1316-1323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study On The Perception Of The Corporate Performance In Accounting And Audit Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana Feleaga

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Niculae Feleaga
  • Mihaela Dumitrascu
Abstract
The environment in which the accounting and auditing firms operate is changing. The economic, technological and financial contexts directly affect their business. In addition, the customers have become more fastidious in terms of the nature, the speed and the precision of the required services. All these developments force the firms to improve their organization by incorporating appropriate performance measurement systems. The objective of this paper is to examine how the organizational performance it is perceived in accounting and auditing firms. In this sense, we checked the perspectives of the balanced scorecard model in a Big Four office and in a small office. The sample consists of 10 Romanian auditors. Eight of auditors are working in one of the Big Four. To achieve this study, were selected only managers. The other two auditors operate in a small office, they being, at the same time, also associates. The sample is homogeneous in terms of the training, the sector of activity and experience. To enable an objective analysis of results, the name of the offices will not be made public. The results showed that in the Big Four office all four perspectives of the balanced scorecard model are checked, while in the small office the number of perspectives is lower, because learning is informal and not materialized. On this perspective, the Big Four office, periodically analyzes the results and try to identify the causes that led to differences in the objectives set. Possible causes that were invoked: overloading of the auditor, additional works, not included in the letter of assignment and the lack of competence of the auditor. Regarding the internal perspective, each office has its own mode, but obviously the Big Four office has human, logistics and financial resources more important, that enabling it to keep its reputation in the market. Instead, the financial goals are the same for both offices analyzed: profitability increasing.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana Feleaga & Niculae Feleaga & Mihaela Dumitrascu, 2013. "Study On The Perception Of The Corporate Performance In Accounting And Audit Firms," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1316-1323, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:1316-1323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n1/139.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Aerts & Denis Cormier & Michel Magnan, 2007. "The Association Between Web‐Based Corporate Performance Disclosure and Financial Analyst Behaviour Under Different Governance Regimes," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1301-1329, November.
    2. Bipin Ajinkya & Sanjeev Bhojraj & Partha Sengupta, 2005. "The Association between Outside Directors, Institutional Investors and the Properties of Management Earnings Forecasts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 343-376, June.
    3. Oecd, 2001. "The Internet and Business Performance," OECD Digital Economy Papers 57, OECD Publishing.
    4. Anne Dietrich & Frédérique Pigeyre, 2005. "La gestion des ressources humaines," Post-Print hal-00185211, HAL.
    5. Cormier, Denis & Ledoux, Marie-Josée & Magnan, Michel, 2009. "The use of Web sites as a disclosure platform for corporate performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24.
    6. José Allouche & Patrice Laroche, 2005. "A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance," Post-Print hal-00923906, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Cormier & Marie-Josée Ledoux & Michel Magnan, 2010. "The Informational Contribution of Social and Environmental Disclosures for Investors," Post-Print hal-00481571, HAL.
    2. Denis Cormier & Walter Aerts & Marie‐Josée Ledoux & Michel Magnan, 2010. "Web‐Based Disclosure About Value Creation Processes: A Monitoring Perspective," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(3), pages 320-347, September.
    3. Thomas Fischer & Angelika Sawczyn, 2013. "The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation: evidence from German listed firms," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 27-52, May.
    4. Argandoña, Antonio, 2011. "The management case for corporate social responsibility," IESE Research Papers D/930, IESE Business School.
    5. Raf Orens & Walter Aerts & Denis Cormier, 2010. "Web‐Based Non‐Financial Disclosure and Cost of Finance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9‐10), pages 1057-1093, November.
    6. Denise Baden & Ian Harwood, 2013. "Terminology Matters: A Critical Exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility Terms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 615-627, September.
    7. Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez & Ainhoa Garayar, 2015. "The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Wolfgang Schultze & Ramona Trommer, 2012. "The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 375-412, January.
    9. Sharma, Narendra, 2014. "Extent of corporate governance disclosure by banks and finance companies listed on Nepal Stock Exchange," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 425-439.
    10. Philip Baird & Pinar Geylani & Jeffrey Roberts, 2012. "Corporate Social and Financial Performance Re-Examined: Industry Effects in a Linear Mixed Model Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 367-388, September.
    11. Jana Pokorná, 2013. "Association between quality management and financial performance," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 16(2), pages 139-148.
    12. Edina Eberhardt-Toth & David Wasieleski, 2013. "A Cognitive Elaboration Model of Sustainability Decision Making: Investigating Financial Managers’ Orientation Toward Environmental Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 735-751, November.
    13. Ruth V. Aguilera & Kurt A. Desender & Mónica López-Puertas Lamy & Jun Ho Lee, 2017. "The governance impact of a changing investor landscape," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(2), pages 195-221, February.
    14. Carol Liu, M.H. & Zhuang, Zili, 2011. "Management earnings forecasts and the quality of analysts’ forecasts: The moderating effect of audit committees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 31-45.
    15. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2013-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Beckmann, Klaus S. & Escobari, Diego A. & Ngo, Thanh, 2019. "The real earnings management of cross-listing firms," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 128-145.
    17. Alice Medioli & Pier Luigi Marchini & Tatiana Mazza, 2024. "The impact of corruption and public governance quality on family firm business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 55-69, January.
    18. Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov & Dejan Spasić, 2016. "Mandatory and Voluntary Disclosures of Serbian Listed Companies - Achieved Level and Some Recommendation for Improving their Relevance," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 9(1), pages 27-38, April.
    19. Andy Lardon & Marc Deloof, 2014. "Financial disclosure by SMEs listed on a semi-regulated market: evidence from the Euronext Free Market," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    20. Kristian D. Allee & Theodore E. Christensen & Bryan S. Graden & Kenneth J. Merkley, 2021. "The Genesis of Voluntary Disclosure: An Analysis of Firms’ First Earnings Guidance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1914-1938, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    accounting and audit firms; corporate performance; balanced scorecard;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:1316-1323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.