[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8883-d1160789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Office Building Marketability before and after the Implementation of Energy Benchmarking and Disclosure Policies—Lessons Learned from Major U.S. Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Luming Shang

    (Department of Construction Management, University of Washington, 120F Architecture Hall, Campus Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Sofia Dermisi

    (Departments of Real Estate and Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Gould Hall 448, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Youngjun Choe

    (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Washington, AERB 141F, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Hyun Woo Lee

    (Department of Construction Management, University of Washington, 120D Architecture Hall, Campus Box 351610, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Yohan Min

    (Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA)

Abstract
An increasing number of U.S. cities require commercial/office properties to publicly disclose their energy performance due to the adoption of energy benchmarking and disclosure policies. This level of transparency provides an additional in-depth assessment of a building’s performance beyond a sustainability certification (e.g., Energy Star, LEED) and may lead less energy-efficient buildings to invest in energy retrofits, therefore improving their marketability. However, the research is scarce on assessing the impact of such policies on office building marketability. This study tries to fill this gap by investigating the impact of energy benchmarking policies on the performance of office buildings in four major U.S. cities (New York; Washington, D.C.; San Francisco; and Chicago). We use interrupted time series analysis (ITSA), while accounting for sustainability certification, public policy adoption, and property real estate performance. The results revealed that in some cities, energy-efficient buildings generally perform better than less energy-efficient buildings after the policy implementation, especially if they are Class A. The real estate performances of energy-efficient buildings also exhibited continuously increasing trends after the policy implementation. However, due to potentially confounding factors, further analysis is required to conclude the policy impacts on energy-efficient buildings are more positive than those on less energy-efficient buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Luming Shang & Sofia Dermisi & Youngjun Choe & Hyun Woo Lee & Yohan Min, 2023. "Assessing Office Building Marketability before and after the Implementation of Energy Benchmarking and Disclosure Policies—Lessons Learned from Major U.S. Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8883-:d:1160789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng, Ting & Hsu, David & Han, Albert, 2017. "Estimating energy savings from benchmarking policies in New York City," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 415-423.
    2. Ariel Linden, 2015. "Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(2), pages 480-500, June.
    3. Muller, A., 2004. "Florida's Motorcycle Helmet Law Repeal and Fatality Rates," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(4), pages 556-558.
    4. Bonde, Magnus & Song, Han-Suck, 2013. "Does greater energy performance have an impact on real estate revenues?," Working Paper Series 13/9, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    5. Franz Fuerst & Patrick McAllister, 2009. "An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 49-64, January.
    6. Alexander Reichardt & Franz Fuerst & Nico B. Rottke & Joachim Zietz, 2012. "Sustainable Building Certification and the Rent Premium: A Panel Data Approach," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 34(1), pages 99-126.
    7. Spenser Robinson & Robert Simons & Eunkyu Lee & Andrew Kern, 2016. "Demand for Green Buildings: Office Tenants' Stated Willingness-to-Pay for Green Features," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 38(3), pages 423-452.
    8. Gary Pivo & Jeffrey D. Fisher, 2010. "Income, Value and Returns in Socially Responsible Office Properties," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 32(3), pages 243-270.
    9. O'Keeffe, Lucy & Palmer, Karen & Walls, Margaret & Hayes, Kristin, 2015. "Energy Benchmarking and Disclosure: Summary of a Workshop on City Experiences, Market Impacts, and Program Evaluation," RFF Working Paper Series dp-15-10, Resources for the Future.
    10. Palmer, Karen & Walls, Margaret, 2015. "Can Benchmarking and Disclosure Laws Provide Incentives for Energy Efficiency Improvements in Buildings?," RFF Working Paper Series dp-15-09, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niina Leskinen & Jussi Vimpari & Seppo Junnila, 2020. "A Review of the Impact of Green Building Certification on the Cash Flows and Values of Commercial Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Christensen, Pernille H. & Robinson, Spenser J. & Simons, Robert A., 2018. "The influence of energy considerations on decision making by institutional real estate owners in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 275-284.
    3. Kevin C. H. Chiang & Gregory J. Wachtel & Xiyu Zhou, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Growth Opportunity: The Case of Real Estate Investment Trusts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 463-478, March.
    4. Castro, P. & Pedroso, R. & Lautenbach, S. & Vicens, R., 2020. "Farmland abandonment in Rio de Janeiro: Underlying and contributory causes of an announced development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Papadopoulos, Sokratis & Bonczak, Bartosz & Kontokosta, Constantine E., 2018. "Pattern recognition in building energy performance over time using energy benchmarking data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 576-586.
    6. Liu, Nan & Zhao, Yuan & Ge, Jiaqi, 2018. "Do renters skimp on energy efficiency during economic recessions? Evidence from Northeast Scotland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 164-175.
    7. Fuerst, Franz & Warren-Myers, Georgia, 2018. "Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Steffen Westermann & Scott Niblock & Michael Kortt, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and the performance of Australian REITs: a rolling regression approach," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 222-234, July.
    9. Zifeng Feng & Zhonghua Wu, 2023. "ESG Disclosure, REIT Debt Financing and Firm Value," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 388-422, October.
    10. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet & Aurélien Decamps, 2012. "The impact of energy efficiency and green performance on the value of corporate real estate portfolios," ERES eres2012_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    11. Lin Xie & Jiahua Liao & Haiting Chen & Xuefei Yan & Xinyan Hu, 2021. "Is Futurization the Culprit for the Violent Fluctuation in China’s Apple Spot Price?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Franz Fuerst & Pat McAllister & Karen Smith, 2010. "Eco-Labeling, Rents, Sales Prices and Occupancy Rates: Do LEED and Energy Star Labeled Offices Obtain Multiple Premiums?," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-01, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    13. Copiello, Sergio, 2017. "Building energy efficiency: A research branch made of paradoxes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1064-1076.
    14. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Anthea Chiovitti, 2017. "The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Benedetto Manganelli & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Tajani & Francesca Salvo, 2019. "Affordability Assessment of Energy-Efficient Building Construction in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Steffen Westermann & Scott J. Niblock & Michael A. Kortt, 2018. "A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Real Estate Investment Trust Studies: An Australian Perspective," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 37(1), pages 92-110, March.
    17. Andrew R. Sanderford & George A. Overstreet & Peter A. Beling & Kanshukan Rajaratnam, 2015. "Energy-efficient homes and mortgage risk: crossing the chasm at last?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 157-168, March.
    18. Fuerst, Franz & McAllister, Pat, 2011. "Eco-labeling in commercial office markets: Do LEED and Energy Star offices obtain multiple premiums?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1220-1230, April.
    19. Ankamah-Yeboah, Isaac & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2014. "Explaining the variation in the value of building energy efficiency certificates: A quantitative meta-analysis," Kiel Working Papers 1949, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Bienert, Sven, . "METASTUDIE :NACHHALTIGKEIT CONTRA RENDITE? Die Implikationen nachhaltigen Wirtschaftens für offene Immobilienfonds am Beispiel der Deka Immobilien Investment GmbH und der WestInvest GmbH," Beiträge zur Immobilienwirtschaft, University of Regensburg, Department of Economics, number 14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8883-:d:1160789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.