[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1194-d208655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding of Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders as a Condition of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska

    (Department of Investment and Real Estate, Faculty of Management, University of Gdańsk, Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland)

  • Joanna Węgrzyn

    (Department of Economics of Real Estate and Investment, Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27a, 31-510 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract
The strategic goal of city management is to ensure its sustainable development which requires a balance of rare resources. From the operational perspective, namely projects implementing sustainable development, the balance refers to human resources. They can be classified into the public or private sector and their cooperation is known as Public–Private Partnership (PPP). Building on the concept of sustainable development and stakeholder theory, the research develops a conceptual framework of stakeholder analysis in PPP projects. More generally, the research aims to contribute to a theoretical understanding of the determinants of sustainable city development and PPP success factors. The research claims that the PPP procurement is consistent with sustainable urban development and the PPP model, accompanied by the stakeholder theory, requires evaluation which balances diverse stakeholders’ interests along the triple bottom of sustainable development. The conceptual framework combines stakeholder attributes of preferred benefits and power and urgency. It includes a time and scope perspective. The research has a descriptive but also a normative character as the framework could be helpful to understand and engage stakeholders in sustainable urban development. The developed framework can be considered for the future construction of a model that can be implemented and tested. This theoretical research is based on a literature survey, applying methods of critical analysis and construction. The innovative approach of the research is based on integrated application of already known concepts of sustainable development, stakeholder theory, and Public–Private Partnership, which are all necessary to create a new approach to management of city development consistent with the known facts.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska & Joanna Węgrzyn, 2019. "Understanding of Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders as a Condition of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1194-:d:208655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanchun Zhang & Jianglin Gu & Ming Shan & Yazhi Xiao & Amos Darko, 2018. "Investigating Private Sectors’ Behavioral Intention to Participate in PPP Projects: An Empirical Examination Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Critical Factors on the Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Neema Kavishe & Nicholas Chileshe, 2018. "Identifying Project Management Practices and Principles for Public–Private Partnerships in Housing Projects: The Case of Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Champika Liyanage & Felix Villalba-Romero, 2015. "Measuring Success of PPP Transport Projects: A Cross-Case Analysis of Toll Roads," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 140-161, March.
    6. Jean Shaoul & Anne Stafford & Pam Stapleton, 2008. "The Cost of Using Private Finance to Build, Finance and Operate Hospitals," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 101-108, April.
    7. Saverio Miccoli & Fabrizio Finucci & Rocco Murro, 2014. "Social Evaluation Approaches in Landscape Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2010. "Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 217-229, May.
    9. Shaoul, Jean & Stafford, Anne & Stapleton, Pamela, 2012. "Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnerships," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 213-229.
    10. Eliza Farelnik & Agnieszka Stanowicka, 2016. "Smart City, Slow City And Smart Slow City As Development Models Of Modern Cities," OLSZTYN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 359-370, November.
    11. Edward Freeman, R. & Evan, William M., 1990. "Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 337-359.
    12. Saverio Miccoli & Fabrizio Finucci & Rocco Murro, 2015. "Measuring Shared Social Appreciation of Community Goods: An Experiment for the East Elevated Expressway of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Ru Liang & Changzhi Wu & Zhaohan Sheng & Xiangyu Wang, 2018. "Multi-Criterion Two-Sided Matching of Public–Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Criteria and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahin Bayramov & Iurii Prokazov & Sergey Kondrashev & Jan Kowalik, 2021. "Household Electricity Generation as a Way of Energy Independence of States—Social Context of Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Han Zhang & Hujun Li & Xiaosu Ye, 2023. "Research on the Influences of Task Interdependence on Team Performance in the Context of the Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation in the Public–Private Partnership Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Shirley Suellen Thesari & Mauro Lizot & Flavio Trojan, 2021. "Municipal Public Budget Planning with Sustainable and Human Development Goals Integrated in a Multi-Criteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Mattia Ferrari, 2020. "Reflexive Governance for Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    7. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Sharon Kwaramba & Stanley Murairwa, 2022. "Enhancing the quality of decisions by administrators: A framework for identifying, classifying and engaging primary school stakeholders in Harare, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 46-56, January.
    10. Zhen Chen & Yaqi Zhao & Xia Zhou & Lin Zhang, 2020. "Investigating Critical Factors That Encourage Private Partners to Participate in Sports and Leisure Characteristic Town Public-Private Partnerships: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Qi Rong & Liangfeng Shen, 2022. "Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Augustinas Maceika & Andrej Bugajev & Olga R. Šostak, 2019. "The Modelling of Roof Installation Projects Using Decision Trees and the AHP Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Simon Odawa & Yongwon Seo, 2019. "Water Tower Ecosystems under the Influence of Land Cover Change and Population Growth: Focus on Mau Water Tower in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Augustinas Maceika & Andrej Bugajev & Olga Regina Šostak & Tatjana Vilutienė, 2021. "Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-33, May.
    16. Qianyi Wang & Ran Li & Kee Cheok Cheong, 2019. "Shandong’s Yintan Town and China’s “Ghost City” Phenomenon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Ozgur Isil & Michael T. Hernke, 2017. "The Triple Bottom Line: A Critical Review from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1235-1251, December.
    3. Annina Lattu & Yuzhuo Cai, 2020. "Tensions in the Sustainability of Higher Education—The Case of Finnish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Juan Abello-Romero & Claudio Mancilla & Walter Sáez & Francisco Ganga-Contreras & Ivette Durán-Seguel, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability of Chilean State Universities: Evidence from Their Strategic Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Lin Wu & Nachiappan Subramanian & Angappa Gunasekaran & Muhammad Dan‐Asabe Abdulrahman & Kulwant Singh Pawar & Des Doran, 2018. "A two‐dimensional, two‐level framework for achieving corporate sustainable development: Assessing the return on sustainability initiatives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1117-1130, December.
    6. Cory Searcy, 2016. "Measuring Enterprise Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 120-133, February.
    7. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    8. Peda, Peeter & Vinnari, Eija, 2020. "The discursive legitimation of profit in public-private service delivery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Guang-Xin Gao, 2018. "Sustainable Winner Determination for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Annachiara Longoni & Raffaella Cagliano, 2018. "Sustainable Innovativeness and the Triple Bottom Line: The Role of Organizational Time Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1097-1120, September.
    11. Peter Oberhofer & Elmar Fürst, 2013. "Sustainable Development in the Transport Sector: Influencing Environmental Behaviour and Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6), pages 374-389, September.
    12. Philipp Haessler, 2020. "Strategic Decisions between Short-Term Profit and Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31, September.
    13. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    14. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Phallapa Petison, 2019. "A Retrospective and Foresight: Bibliometric Review of International Research on Strategic Management for Sustainability, 1991–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Johann Meckenstock & Ana Paula Barbosa‐Póvoa & Ana Carvalho, 2016. "The Wicked Character of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Evidence from Sustainability Reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7), pages 449-477, November.
    16. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    17. Annor Silva Junior & Priscilla Oliveira Martins-Silva & Katia Cyrlene Araújo Vasconcelos & Vitor Correa Silva & José Michel Rocha Monteiro & Sarah Luiza Martins Silva Brito & Tássia Calile Souza Santo, 2021. "Sustainability for Brazilian management students: integrity and opportunism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1292-1315, February.
    18. Hee‐Chan Song, 2021. "Buddhist approach to corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3040-3052, November.
    19. Siarhei Manzhynski & Frank Figge, 2020. "Coopetition for sustainability: Between organizational benefit and societal good," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 827-837, March.
    20. Fabien Martinez, 2019. "On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-02887640, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1194-:d:208655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.