Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Pittsburgh

So, as you obviously are aware now, the new Pitt WikiProject is up and running. Please feel free to leave comments or suggests, or take the initiative and edit/add to the wikiproject yourself. CrazyPaco (talk) 23:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

glad it got started! I started putting some assessments for other articles. Really glad to see this! Lyellin (talk) 01:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just saw this in the news. I don't know much about it, but I guess the "Blue-Gold" this spring is becoming more and more popular. Perhaps this is worth an article? [1]--Shizzy9989 (talk) 16:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It most likely isn't sustainable as an independent article yet, but a section within the Pittsburgh Panthers football page would be justified. As a section in that article, it can grow from there.CrazyPaco (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I just made a page where we can keep track of AFDs and PRODs on Pitt-related articles. Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Pittsburgh/Deletion. I will leave it up to Mr. Crazy Paco to find a place for it on the main page. I pretty much borrowed it from the WP:UNI group. Speaking of that, I really like their layout, with the sidebar. Should we borrow that idea too? Template:WPUni sidebar--Shizzy9989 (talk) 03:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not sure where to put that, so I added a subsection. Hopefully, we won't get many more AFDs;-) Feel free to move it though. I think this wikiproject may slowly move to Turnkey style over time, that seems to be all the rage, check out Columbia's and Georgia Tech's for examples. Feel free to add a side bar or clean up the main project page in any way you think might help. I actually modeled it on UVA's.CrazyPaco (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, I made a tag for Pitt articles that need cleanup: User:Shizzy9989/Sandbox. I'll fix it up a bit before activating it.--Shizzy9989 (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is ready to go now. Check it out: {{Template:Cleanup-Pitt}}. Tagging an article with it will add it to Category:University of Pittsburgh needing cleanup.Again, I did borrow the code from WP:UNI--Shizzy9989 (talk) 05:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The only problem is that it is a no-no to use a non-free images on any of the talk pages or templates. Non-free/Fair-use logos can only be used in articles with appropriate justification. There are bots out there patrolling the fair-use policy and the banner will get the "PITT" logo nominated for deletion because of this policy. Substitute your choice of any creative commons or public domain image onto the tag instead of the copyrighted Pitt logo. Feel free to place it in the template table as well once the logo issue is fixed. Thanks for making it!CrazyPaco (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, that was a dumb mistake. Fixed it. Also, here's an infobox that I got started: Wikipedia:PITT/Infobox. Maybe someone else can take a look at it and see want they think, and maybe tweak it. --Shizzy9989 (talk) 04:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

For the record, it's finals time at Georgetown, so if I'm not editing too much, that's why. Lyellin (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Here is a picture I took of a plaque in the Cathedral of Learning that has some information about the Nationality rooms: Image:Cathedral Plaque.jpg It is of poor quality, but the data it has about dedication years should be helpful to the Nationality Rooms article. I intended to take a bunch of photos of the rooms themselves, but they were all locked (WTF?). So, I took a pamphlet, and you can find the transcribed text of that pamphlet here: Image talk:Cathedral Plaque.jpg--TheZachMorrisExperience (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!, we'll integrate this information.CrazyPaco (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Picture requested for deletion. Sigh - copyright paranoia strikes again, please comment at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images of TheZachMorrisExperience - more Pitt pictures affected by this nom as well.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 13:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, false alarm. Those are all self-noms that are either preserved in Wikipedia by fair use or are actual copyvios. It is a long story, and I can explain if you want.--HoboJones (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just wrote a few new articles about Pitt student publications. The last three on the list might need a bit of help.

• Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review
• University of Pittsburgh Law Review
• Journal of Law and Commerce
• Pittsburgh Tax Review
• Journal of Technology Law & Policy
• Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law

--TheZachMorrisExperience (talk) 03:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just nominated this article for Featured Article status. Comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/University of Pittsburgh please. Thanks, Grsz^talk 03:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

probably should have went up for GA first, but we'll she how she does. CrazyPaco (talk) 04:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No worries, apparantly this isn't how it's done. The nomination was withdrawn. Grsz^talk 04:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a request for comment about whether or not WP:BOOSTER documents a standard consensus and good practice that all editors and school/college/university articles should follow as an official policy or guideline. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please take a look here. We need more people to get it going! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

All WikiProjects are invited to have their "milestone-reached" announcements automatically placed onto Wikipedia's announcements page. Milestones could include the number of FAs, GAs or articles covered by the project. No work need be done by the project themselves; they just need to provide some details when they sign up. A bot will do all of the hard work. Click here for more information or to sign your project up.

I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 10:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a thread on the administrators' noticeboard which may concern editors involved in the Pitt WikiProject and may affect the article Hail to Pitt, among others. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Lyrics. CrazyPaco (talk) 01:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

See details: Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/Pittsburgh#Wikipedia_Loves_Art_in_Piitsburgh.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:49, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

A discussion has begun regarding the Template:University of Pittsburgh and its possible improvement. Please leave any thoughts on this subject that you may have on the template's talk page. CrazyPaco (talk) 02:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Where do athletes fall in the importance categories? I'd say that most are low importance, but sometimes, in the case of a Tony Dorsett or Mike Ditka, would the importance raise to Mid? I know that Jock Sutherland was a major contributor to Pitt football, but is he really "Top" importance? WP's base criteria for top-importance is:

"Article is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field."

I'd say that most or all of the top football/athletic individuals should be "mid-importance", the base criteria being:

"Article is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area."

I'm asking because I'm seeing these different people all over the scale. Thoughts? I'm starting a discussion on our rating system because I'd also like to put together our assessment page up to the standards of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Assessment. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 12:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

So if "Article is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field" and that field for the Pitt Wikiproject, then it should be how crucial it is to the topic of the "University of Pittsburgh". I think top level might be Pitt itself, UPMC, maybe the Cathedral of Learning, Heinz Chapel, Pittsburgh Panthers. High level might be the various schools like A&S or Pitt Med and maybe buildings like Hillman Library, Alumni Hall and Pitt football and Pitt basketball. Mid-level could be various chancellors of the university like Wesley Posvar, notable faculty like Samuel Pierpoint Langley, athletes like Tony Dorsett and coaches like Jock Sutherland. Low-level is everything else. What do you think? I think if there is a building named after you at Pitt (like Stazl, Sutherland, and Langley) you might be assumed to a different level. I would say the on the athletic side, mid-level sports individuals include Sutherland, Doc Carlson, Dorsett, Dan Marino, and Mike Ditka. The later three athletes have transcended their sports to become popular culture icons outside of the university as well, so I put them on a different plane than say Bill Fralic. Or we could go by Hall of Fame or retired jerseys. I'm not sure. Whatever criteria you come up with I think would be good because it does need to be standardized. CrazyPaco (talk) 01:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're making sense; I might have been a little confused whenever I started this conversation. Those assessments sound right to me. Any chancellors, professors, or other staff who have achieved significant notability should probably considered at least mid. Someone such as Jonas Salk falls under that category of extremely notable as a researcher who also has a building named after him, well deserving the high-importance already on his article. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have done a GA Reassessment of the Litchfield Towers article as part of the GA Sweeps project. My review can be found here. I have found that the artice does not meet the current GA Criteria. As such I have put the article on hold for a week and I am notifying all interested projects and editors. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/Pittsburgh#Let.27s_have_a_meetup_soon. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is a discussion at Talk:David Hunter Riddle#President of the University of Pittsburgh? that is relevant to this Wikiproject.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the University of Pittsburgh articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Interested editors are invited to Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop. It will also cover how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. If you are an instructor or a student, this workshop may be quite useful to you. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:27, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

If any WikiProject University of Pittsburgh members wish to contribute to the Edward J. Wasp (the pioneer of coal slurry pipelines and an alumnus of the University of Pittsburgh) article, please feel free. I have posted a few links on the article's talk page, and I am certain other articles exist so more research is needed. Any assistance would be much appreciated. --Another Believer _(Talk) 02:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interested editors are welcome to attent a teaching with Wikipedia workshop I am holding at noon at the Pitt's department of sociology. More info: [2] --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Relevant deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_30#File:Pittfootballhelmet.png.--GrapedApe (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You may want to add your thoughts on this issue at Template talk:University of Pittsburgh CrazyPaco (talk) 08:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please leave your comments at Template talk:University of Pittsburgh#Removed colours. CrazyPaco (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sad as it is, the bomb threats have become a big deal, so I just wrote this article about them: 2012 University of Pittsburgh Bomb Threats. Please help me expand and update it should you feel so inclined. Thanks. Dar-Ape 05:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to let you know that I am trying to reinvigorate the ACC Wikiproject. Please feel free to stop by for a look. CrazyPaco (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am seeking opinions on creating the best navigation box for the topic of Pittsburgh Panthers football at Template talk:Pittsburgh Panthers football navbox#Navbox contents. Three possible examples are provided in addition to the current version. Any comments and additional suggestions would be appreciated. CrazyPaco (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

For those looking for ideas to work on, the new List of Pittsburgh Panthers football All-Americans has many redlinked All-Americans that could use articles. Many of the linked All-Americans are also at stub status and could use serious expansion. CrazyPaco (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please join the discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navigation template for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Currently, and for quite some time, all Pittsburgh sports venues have succession boxes that allow the reader to trace the occupation of each venue by each Pittsburgh pro or college team. Recently, some of these have been removed, particularly Pitt's basketball venues, breaking the consistency across the Pittsburgh sports landscape for this navigation, particularly disrupting shared venues such as Fitzgerald Field House (Pitt, Duquesne) and Pitt Stadium (Steelers, Pitt). Previous discussions of similar issues occurred at Forbes Field's talk page. Please comment on the continued inclusion of these succession boxes at Talk:Pitt Stadium. Thank you. CrazyPaco (talk) 12:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

• I left a response at the Pittsburgh project talk page. Not much to say other then thanks for keeping up with this and I will also check some randomly in the future. ^{Market St.⧏} _{⧐ Diamond Way} 13:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Portal:University of Pittsburgh, has been nominated for deletion. Please share your opinions on the matter by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/University portals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. CrazyPaco (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just dropping a note to see if anyone has photos of the Bradford campus; if so, they would be a welcome addition to the page. Thanks! --JohnDorian48 (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)JohnDorian48Reply

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

A requested move is under discussion at Talk:Acrisure Stadium § Requested move 22 July 2022. ––FormalDude talk 21:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Three Rivers Stadium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm proposing to merge this and other inactive higher education-related wikiprojects to WikiProject Higher education. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education#Merge of inactive higher education wikiprojects. – Joe (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would oppose this on the same grounds as Ejgreen77 as this wiikproject is a related/subproject of the large scope WikiProject Pittsburgh. We are also attempting to reactive the Pitt wikiproject. CrazyPaco (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply