Valkyrie Red

{{help me}}

I don't really like archiving my talk page by myself, and I've seen other users use a bot to automatically archive their talk page. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks!--Valkyrie Red 14:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Have a look at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo which explains how to use MiszaBot III to do so. Regards SoWhy 14:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!--Valkyrie Red 14:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

{{help me}}

I know how to sign posts after finishing them (you add Valkyrie Red 14:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC) at the end) but for some reason, whenever I sign my posts it says "preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red. Even if I click the autosign button it still says that. How do I fix my signature/Can someone tell me what's wrong with my signature? Thanks! (When I'm done with this post and I sign it, it will say that phrase)--Valkyrie Red 14:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Do you add ~~~~ at the end of your posts? Jarkeld (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I do. Like right now, I will add itValkyrie Red 15:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Your signature does not have a link to your userpage or talk page. Simplest way to fix it is to turn off the "sign my name exactly as shown" in your preferences. Timotheus Canens (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot man! Appreciate it!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 15:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the case where there is a prequel developed after the initial film, we would consider that to be "followed by". For the Star Wars films, although they started with the later films and then went into the prequels, it is more helpful for readers who know nothing of the topic to know what came first. These films were several decades apart and resulted in different special effects, new actors, and more developed techniques from the director and crew. Although it may be confusing which may come first, there should always be a section in the article that talks about any prequels/sequels to clarify for the reader. There is a current discussion going on at WT:FILM if you would like further thoughts by other editors. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{help me}}

Like if I were to redirect to the section "second gathering" in the Trojan War article. How do I do that?--Valkyrie Red (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

For example, [[User talk:Valkyrie Red#Note|This bit]] = This bit.

[[Trojan War#The second gathering]] gives Trojan War#The second gathering.

See Wikipedia:Linking#Piped links to sections of articles.  Chzz  ►  01:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 02:08, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{help me}}

Hello there fellow Wikipedians! I need to help to make Wikipedia a more reliable source of information. For this I am talking about the Battle of Gettysburg Article, which was indeed a decisive victory for the North but unfortunately there is a user who uses articles written by himself to claim that it wasn't a victory. Someone please aid me!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 14:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, any and all facts relating to the Battle of Gettysburg, victory or not, must be verified, by independant reliable sources. And if either you or the other user are using your own original research it is unacceptable for the article. You must discuss this on the talk page with this other user and if the dispute continues then follow the steps laid out in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests. -- œ^™ 15:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{help me}}

Yeah, the above guy didn't help at all, so is there anyone else willing to join in?--Valkyrie Red (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you provide me a link to this user and articles he references? Spitfire19 (Talk) 20:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I made the edit for you as of right now. Please come to User talk:Spitfire19 if you have any more issues with this topic. :) Spitfire19 (Talk) 21:22, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If your only goal was to recruit editors to "join in" and take your side over another's to "help you prove a point" then no, I guess I didn't help at all, as that is NOT what the helpme template is for. I suggest you read the advice I gave above regarding dispute resolution. -- œ^™ 15:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes. You asked if the victory was "decisive". Most commentators seem to think so. If you look at the other articles on Wikipedia in other languages, for example, they pretty much all say "Decisive Union Victory". The German one though is cautious like this article is at present, and calls it a "Union Victory". Personally I think it was decisive as it is considered the turning point of the war, and after it the Confederates went into headlong retreat. The Union was also easily able to replace the 25% casualties. The Confederacy was unable to replace its 33% losses. All and all, it was a disaster for the South. Wallie (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Valkyrie Red. You have new messages at Spitfire19's talk page.
Message added 21:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Spitfire19 (Talk) 21:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh wow, that was almost two years ago. Sure, what do you need help in? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, sure I'm willing. I'm just unsure if that is risking point of view pushing on a topic. Before I start work, tell me why you decided to work on this issue. Also, do you have credible evidence to back it up? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It sounds like you are involved in a content dispute here, one that has been going on for almost three and a half years. I am willing to mediate it, but I am not going to get involved. The fact that you have also used a sock to edit-war here also makes me less inclined to help. If you can produce something that might swing my opinion, by all means try and do so but at this time I'm not gonna help you directly. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Your edits to Troy (film) have been reverted. MM 207.69.137.27 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

That wikipedia is not a reliable source with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy is specifically stated: WP:CIRCULAR. MM 207.69.137.27 (talk) 00:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{help me}}

I remember that this other user said that this article is viewed more than the others. How do you check that? Thanks!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

http://stats.grok.se/  Chzz  ►  19:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{help me}}

Yeah, another use insulted me. How do you report them? Thanks!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 22:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I assume that you mean this edit. I would not, personally, consider that to be a personal attack, or in breach of any Wikipedia policies, therefore I do not think any further action is necessary.

If you wish to pursue the matter (which I do not advise), you could either discuss it directly with the other user, or raise it on Wikiquette alerts.

However, my advice is to drop the STICK and have a nice cup of tea or something. Best,  Chzz  ►  22:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ideally, there would be an infobox for the conflict since even our articles on fictional wars use the infobox (see One Year War for an example), however the addition of the box can be a tricky issue if the people who keep tabs on the article decide to remove the box based on consensus. If this is the case, then I would recommend leaving the article infobox-free and instead work on gaining consensus for the reintroduction of the box. Remember, at the end of the day all the box does in summaries what going to be presented in the article, so its loss is not necessarily a devastating thing, it just means that those visiting the article will have to actually read through the material to get a feel for it rather than glance at the infobox and get a rough overview of it. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm incline to wait awhile longer before making a move here, I want to make sure that everything is out in the open and that usually means waiting until the last of the comments added is at least 24-hours old. When that happens I think a straw poll will be in order to determine the consensus for the infobox on the page. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

They act according to WP:BOLD, and to a lesser extent, WP:IAR, its just unfortunate that in this case neither one of these positions took well to the debate. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Coordinators be thou for the contributors. We exist not to force adherence to policy or guideline, but help bring people to an agreement on how things should appear in articles. To this end therefore I look to consensus to establish a course of action, in this manner, I leave the major decision to the editors and place myself in a position to enforce whatever consensus emerges in a poll. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:54, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Valkyrie Red. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts.
Message added 13:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Netalarm^talk 13:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Valkyrie Red. I've been trying to help maintain the Trojan War box, which I consider more of a navigational template. (By the way, I did come to your page to ask for input when you fell silent during the creation of the Trojan War nav template, because I felt that since you had been a major voice, you should be heard before finalizing. I'm sorry you weren't able to participate in finishing that.) But I'm not really interested in taking a lead role in the article. You should probably go to the Trojan War talk page. Cynwolfe (talk) 11:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, It was recently suggested that WikiProject United States History might be inactive or semiactive and that it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States.

I have started a discussion and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --Kumioko (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A few things regarding your edits here and here.

• That section is contentious. And the standing consensus is that it is appropriate in covering the overall development, use, exploitation, and critiques of the character. Please go back through the archives of the articles talk page to see this.
• In order for this to be removed, an active change in consensus needs to be shown. Not just a single editor stating "I see no need..." It is unfortunate that you did not get an immediate response to you talk page post of July 21, but that does not show active change.
• Your semi-bold removal did get the response indicative of the standing consensus, whether you want to hear it or not. Along with a return to the status quo.
• Repeating the removal after that without bothering to return to the talk page can be taken as the start of disruptive editing in most cases. Doing it with sourced material that is in place with a strong consensus could be seen as worse.

- J Greb (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Since it's come up again. this is disruptive and editing in bad faith. You have been pointed to the talk page and the archives for the consensus on this. If you cannot work with in that and continue to edit this way you will be blocked for vandalism. - J Greb (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello

Please don't create implausible or useless redirects.

• Mr. Poppers Penguins (film) is either broken English or catering to a French-language aesthetic. Neither is a reason to create it as a redirect.
• ディックグレイソン would possibly be useful if it were a Japanese-language topi and the article has started out there instead of under an English title. It's less than pointless for an English-language topic on the English-language Wikipedia.

And, so you are clear on it, a warning. Please so not engage in personal attacks as you did here.

- J Greb (talk) 21:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{help me-helped}} on this page with {{help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Yeah, no point in mentioning names since no one even cares, but what do you do if someone acts like they own the page and will restrict others from making changes just cause they have a set way of operating the page? Are there any rules that can be used, like any WP pages? Thanks!--Valkyrie Red (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:OWN says nobody owns a page; if discussion on the article talk page doesn't get anywhere, see WP:Dispute resolution for possible ways forward; if it gets serious, post at WP:AN/I giving names and diffs. Note that if you post at AN/I you must notify anyone you mention. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.Reply

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, this message is to inform you that there is a thread concerning you at the Administrators' noticeboard.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Valkyrie Red! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Valkyrie Red! I'm so happy to see you signed up to join the project - welcome. You can dive into our to-do lists here. Be sure to watchlist your favorites, as they will continue to grow as new content gets added to the WDL website. Also, you can always search the WDL website for something that you're interested in. And be sure to share your outcomes here. If I can help with anything just ask and welcome aboard! SarahStierch (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi Valkyrie Red! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

• We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
• Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
• WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
• Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Warbox. Since you had some involvement with the Warbox redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

In reply to the comment you left on my talk page, please see history - your name is there. Was it created unintentionally, or without your knowing about it? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.215.254 (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.186.136 (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lego Marvel Super Heroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nemesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.186.136 (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I happened to notice your comment on Corvoes talk page:

I want to discuss a change because that's my right as a contributor to Wikipedia, but no one will respond even after using the ping template. How am I supposed to initiate a logic-based discussion if no one is willing to discuss?

Just a friendly reminder: Wikipedia talk pages are about improving its articles, not a general discussion forum. Meaning don't feel bad if nobody responds to any general discussion or questions, it could well be that people don't see any direct relevance to Wikipedia. In that case, you will be better off posting your thoughts elsewhere.

Therefore, assuming your ideas directly concern our articles, my best advice is: Be WP:BOLD and go ahead and edit the article(s) in question! This will normally trigger a response, assuming not everyone agrees with you. Perhaps you will be reverted, but you should normally expect that editor to explain why, thus starting the discussion you seek :)

Regards CapnZapp (talk) 11:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Point Break, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paycheck (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to enact a change on a page and presented the idea on said page's talk page. However, it's been a couple of days and no one has responded. This would be a relatively large change, so I can't Be Bold. How do I get others to participate?--Valkyrie Red (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If it is an article the best way is to put the article up for an RfC, as seen here WP:RFC some people get notifications of the RFC and will respond to it, though I do recommend contacting the other primary editors and other editors of the article by leaving them a message on their talk page, to let them know that there is an ongoing RFC a article that they contributed to. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A few things regarding image files

1. Try not to change files in articles by uploading a different image over the file already on Wikipedia. The file you want to place should be uploaded under a different file name.
2. When you upload a file, make sure that the non-free media information and use rationale is consistent with the image you upload. Discrepancies between the two will lead to the image being removed.
3. Non-free image are of limited size. With regard to comic book character, 1,500 pixel × 2,049 pixel is well above the acceptable limit.

And it seems you are still creating implausible redirects. Please stop that.

- J Greb (talk) 11:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

To clarify with the implausible redirects:

• Redirects for incorrect capitalization are not wanted are not wanted.
• Redirects from non-standard abbreviations are not wanted.
• Redirects from non-standard or fanish alternate titles are not wanted.

Also:

• Don't disrupt radio or television station articles to create unwanted redirects. Don't even add hat notes pointing to the other article.
• Don't disrupt dab pages to add the above type of links.

- J Greb (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are starting up some WP:3RR for this one genre edit so please stop reverting my edits. It was my original edit to call it an action thriller. I saw the movie and it was a thriller without a doubt. Don't think this is true? Watch the movie and get a clue. - Theironminer (talk) 19:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for explaining the removal.

Now, please do it on your initial edits when you remove chunks of text that have a reference. Otherwise it looks like awkward at best.

- J Greb (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Caitlin snow. Since you had some involvement with the Caitlin snow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. J Greb (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keystone City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Allen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Spectre isn't a sequel: it's another film in the series and the plot lines are separate. No other Bond article has information about the following film for the same reason. - SchroCat (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Arrowverse shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex|The|Whovian^? 05:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not true at all. I revert irrelevant information all the time. When I say "irrelevant", I don't mean that the time remove it is irrelevant, but that information is not needed for Wikipedia. It's a minute detail. Fictional characters are fictional, not real. They don't have "full names". We go by how they are credited.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's the comic book, this is the show. It links to him. that's only relevant to comic fans.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

What part of my comment suggests high and mighty status? I'm a comic fan. I also know how to differentiate between the TV show and the comic books and not including information that is only relevant to a small set of readers. The average reader that just enjoys The Flash isn't going to care that Cisco's full name is "Francisco" (and last night wasn't even the first time it was used). We operate from an objective approach. That is, character names are their credited names, not the in-universe name. That's why Harvey Dent is not "Two-Face" on the "Dark Knight" page. Why Thea is just Thea, and not "Thea Deardon Queen".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm a huge Superman fan. I'm more DC than Marvel period, hence why I tend to write for the DC related pages (Smallville, Arrow, The Flash, etc.).  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boss Tweet. Since you had some involvement with the Boss Tweet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TimothyJosephWood 16:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Valkyrie Red,

I am working on a page for the Russian intelligence during the Napoleonic Invasion of Russia. Do you have any advice or good sources for me?

Thank you, TeresaZidek (talk)TeresaZidek —Preceding undated comment added 19:07, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Leave me alone.Reply

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.Reply

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply

Please participate in ongoing discussions of content under dispute; editing while ignoring such discussions is generally considered disruptive, as it makes the content being discussed a moving target, derailing attempts at consensus. --A D Monroe III^(talk) 02:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

We all know that article talk pages are for discussing problems with the article. Your recent article talk page comments seem to accuse me of being the problem. If true, this should go to one of the Administrator Noticeboard pages, where problem editors can be remedied. Making such accusations on article talk pages cannot fix this kind of problem, but can only add acrimony and make reaching consensus harder. In my experience, content dispute discussions go much smoother when other editors aren't even mentioned, which I've heard expressed as "discuss edits, not editors". --A D Monroe III^(talk) 02:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to chime in here myself, and thank User:A D Monroe III for his collegial approach in creating this thread. I recollect editing with User:Valkyrie Red many years ago and I have a vague memory of experiencing some hot temper from that user when we disagreed. First, I'd like to welcome you back, Valkyrie Red. It is good to see we're both still alive to argue about such comparatively minor points of ACW lore. Second, the passion and knowledge which Valkyrie Red brings to the table are formidable and could be enormously useful in helping lots of content area works get improved. We have missed you. Third, I think the subject of this disagreement is a very important point about which to disagree. It may be impossible for us to utilize the results parameter in the infobox, since the outcome of the battle is legitimately arguable. I'll make my points in that discussion, but thank you both for being willing to discuss on talk. BusterD (talk) 22:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I never once editted or collaborated in an editing scheme with you. If you want to make false accusations against me, be my guest- just keep such slander (libel?) off my talk page.Valkyrie Red (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

With regards to you Mr. Monroe, all I'll say is that you lose good faith when you engage in an edit war, abandon discussions that don't cater to your opinion, and engage in acts of hypocrisy.Valkyrie Red (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Glad to see we're both still alive and kicking. Happy editing! BusterD (talk) 01:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Valkyrie Red,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Valkyrie Red,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greatest of All Time. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 22:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tlou (tv series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § Tlou (tv series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Valkyrie Red

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Luka magic, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 26#Luka magic.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Westbrick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 23. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply