Prosnu

 

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Prosnu! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 21:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Saudis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Please don't switch out information like numbers without also changing the sources, and please make sure you are using reliable sources (Twitter is self-published/social media and thus not reliable for Wikipedia's purposes). Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Prosnu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 23:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Foreign relations of Saudi Arabia into Foreign relations of South Korea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:New Palestinian Passport.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 14:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Dibyaza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In relation to your edits in Guadalquivir, given that Seybold's Glossarium and R. Martí's Vocabulista include wādī and wād under the meaning of riuuscode: lat promoted to code: la or flumencode: lat promoted to code: la , it is my understanding that river (río) should prevail as translation of 'wādī' in the context of hydronyms from Andalusi Arabic whenever specialised sources say so, irrespective of other (more common?) meanings in any other context. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Azerbaijani language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gimel

added a link pointing to Punjabi alphabet

Qoph

added a link pointing to Punjabi alphabet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Baal, you may be blocked from editing. Sinclairian (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was just adding the Arabic names to the pages which are part of the Arabian culture, the Nabateans were Arabs and their Arabic names clearly shows that, how is it that their names are written in Greek when they spoke Nabatean Arabic as a native language and you are not allowing me to put up their names

and Baal was part of ancient Syria so why the name is only in Hebrew? and not in Arabic as well and if not why not in Aramaic? do you have an issue with the Arabic language?

I did not change the information or altered it, so please show me the reason why not to add Arabic names? Prosnu (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

As I have explained to you several times – Baal is not notably attested to in Arabic sources. He was not worshipped by Arabians, and his name is not found in Arabia outside of the generic noun ba'l to denote "master". Hebrew is not the only name listed for Baal, there is an explanatory footnote in the first sentence of the article which shows the name "Baal" is every relevant language, including Ugaritic and Phoenician – the languages spoken by the people who worshipped Baal in the first place. Likewise, as I said before, the only reason the Hebrew ba'al is listed outside of that explanatory footnote is because it is the direct etymological source for the English term "Baal", considering that Hebrew is the only Semitic language which doubled the a to produce Ba'al instead of Ba'l.

As for the Nabataeans, they neither spoke Modern Arabic nor wrote in the Arabic alphabet, so while they may have been of Arabic stock, you can't just add the Modern Arabic name for the kings, considering they also had Aramaic names and only officially left Aramaic inscriptions, we do not know what form or pronunciation their names would have had in their native Nabataean Arabic language.

I hope this clears up any residual confusion. Sinclairian (talk) 15:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It has been established that the Nabateans spoke Arabic as their native language, there is a type of Arabic poetry called Nabatean Poetry which is used in the Arabian Peninsula's modern music, so I can't understand how adding an Arabic name to an "Arabian" Semitic king's page is going to have a historical issue while adding their "Greek" name is important, the region was even called """Arabia""" Petraea during Roman times.

Their Arabic names are not a translation of Aramaic but clearly of Arabic origin, Arabic was already part of their language and Arabic is a language continuum, Modern Arabic is based on Classical and Old Arabic, it is not based on Modern Dialects

Arabic and Aramaic are both Semitic languages and Arabic is the modern prevalent language in all of the former Middle Eastern Semitic regions including Levant, Mesopotamia and Arabian Peninsula and these people speak Arabic nowadays. Prosnu (talk) 16:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Prosnu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dibyaza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Prosnu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dibyaza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Bogazicili. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Konya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bogazicili (talk) 16:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:New Palestinian Passport.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Al-Andalus into Mediterranean Sea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply