CycloneYoris

i Removed Warnings Because i Want to be Respectful, I Never Harassing a People Again Raayaan9911 (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Uhhh… Not sure I understand what this is about. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I respect you! Raayaan9911 (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Likewise. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering if you could give me some extra time to get the article up to standard instead of deleting it? Also if you could help me with some questions I have, that would be greatly appreciated. Allthingschristimage (talk) 12:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page was already deleted in mainspace, but you can continue working on the draft at Draft:Dr. Steve Mbua, which still exists. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why are you reverting my correction of Source 14-it's the wrong list. The text discusses top six in the Olympics, not the US Nationals-mine is the right list 2603:8000:713F:79F:4042:78CA:E096:5F85 (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

User:CycloneYoris made a comment re deletion of a file User:MountVic127/Shortcuts and I would like to add an extra comment in reply.

But I coulded retrace my steps to find where that file is. Please help :-) :-) ----MountVic127 (talk) 04:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, where is the "Recent Changes" button? ----MountVic127 (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

MountVic127. No worries. You can find the page at User:MountVic127/ShortCuts where I moved it yesterday. Also, the "recent changes" tab can be found on the sidebar, at the left side of your screen. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I feel that the speedy deletion on the page is unacceptable. Zente is indeed an voice actor in this film! He is in the Hungarian version of it. I don't see why it needs to be deleted if all of the contents are true and I added references. Please get back to me by using the talk feature on my profile page. Jadezplays1 (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I made a page about chess player Mike Klein, but it was deleted. I reasoned that Mike Klein was not only a Fide Master, but is also the voice behind ChessKid, which was made by Chess.com, a famous chess website. Being both a chessmaster and an online celebrity, I believe that he should have a Wikipedia page. Mymomisthegreatest (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am working on a series of New York artists of color and I had the first article removed for advertising. Would you be able to provide the original text so that I can review and try to make it align better with wiki policy? ANdA2024 (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ANdA2024: Sure. Feel free to ask the deleting admin, Seraphimblade, and maybe they'll restore the deleted content for you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment, and at Talk:Mughal dynasty on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm new to NPP and noticed you drafted an article that I nominated for deletion. I'm very new to NPP and realize that my original reasoning for nominating it for deletion could have been nicer and should have gone into more detail, but I was wondering if there was a specific reason you chose to close the nomination and make it a draft. Is it common for articles listed at AFD to be made into drafts before people have had time to vote? How does someone decide that an article listed for deletion can just be put back into draftspace? IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@IntentionallyDense: Yes, it is completely common, given that deletion on newer articles is typically uncontroversial (since they are likely to be deleted without anyone objecting) and that's the reason why sending to draftspace is standard procedure in such cases. Opening an AfD should only be viewed as a last resort. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay good to know thank you for taking the time to explain that to me! IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@CycloneYoris: There's a misconception that draftification is the default option, but that's actually disputed depending on who you ask. Many would argue AFD is the more appropriate default option.

With that said, I'm not aware of speedy non-admin closures to draftify at AfD being at all common, I'd actually call them quite rare. The AfD was open for 2 hours and I don't think this is a close I would have made. I discourage you from speedy closing discussions as draftify in the future CycloneYoris. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hey man im josh: I was referring to sending new articles to draftspace, which is common since NP patrollers do that all the time (myself included); and not closing an AfD as "draftify", which is indeed quite rare as you have pointed out. The reason I did so was because there wasn't much content on the article in question, and opening an AfD was unnecessary IMO. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page should not be speedily deleted because (Tariq Masood is a very influential and well-known figure among the Pakistani population. He is no less influential than several other scholars such as Taqi Usmani, Tariq Jameel, and Muhammad Ali Mirza. All of these aforementioned people do have their own wikipedia pages so I do believe that it is fair for him to have his own page as well. See citation number one. On page 237, Mohammad Waqas Sajjad writes, "Mufti Tariq Masood, a Deobandi scholar with a special interest in issues of gender and a vocal critic of liberals in Pakistan, is a prominent name in religious discourses in the country." (https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/87829/9783110788334.pdf?sequence=1#page=244) ) --HIM20 (talk) 04:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]Reply

I am currently working on improving this article and I don't think there is any fair reason for its deletion. HIM20 (talk) 04:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@HIM20: I don't think there is any fair reason for its deletion. Of course there is! It was deleted at this AfD discussion last year. I therefore suggest creating the article via the WP:AfC process (in order to overturn the consensus reached at the AfD). Or you can move it draftspace and submit the draft for review. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm a new User, just joined 2 months ago so help me to add an image in my upcoming film's page. The2KKidRulez (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

BEFORE even says to check if it meets CSD, before throwing it to AFD. Too wrapped up in “a PROD will just get wiped by the article creator”, to think of A7. Egg on my face moment here, huh? Thanks for covering the gap in my thought process.

Article creator also has a sock (Djwjsjejej) and if you see what they put in the ‘account creation log’? Sliiightly worrying.

Cheers. MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 20:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Matticusmadness: No worries. The good thing is that CSD tags can be reinstated (unlike PROD tags) even if they're removed by the author. I figured that the page was a perfect candidate for A7 since it didn't have a single source. Cheers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. Any thoughts on if we need a mop, or some WP:Salt? Might even be G4 as well as A7? (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITT Family Games) MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 21:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Creator of the ITT Family Games page. ITT Family Games Wikipedia Page shall not be deleted because imagine not having a page of a less-known company! You could learn their actions, activities, etc. I'm from Germany and i have a friend named Braush Eintaz that worked in ITT Family Games, he told everything he knew of his company and made the Alien's Return game although he's not in that page, i might edit it. I demand a deletion of the speedy deletion! Atari2600wikipedi (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, we have tried to create a film wiki page. want to move it for approval and publishing, please help, here is link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Newtitle Btlc2020 (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just for clarity for myself, on the page Resident doctor (England) you said should be RfD is that the typical procedure even in instances, as was the case here, it was myself who accidentally created it and was putting it forward for CSD as part of fixing the error? Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Rambling Rambler: Thanks. I've now tagged it as G7 since you have requested deletion, and I somehow didn't realize that you'd just created it. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated. Wasn't sure if it was just an understandable oversight or another one of those "yes this is policy if you follow the correct sublink in paragraph 85 of policy 446 that'll take you to paragraph 76 of policy 182" situations. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CycloneYoris

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Conyo14, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of storms named Hugo, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Conyo14}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Conyo14 (talk) 04:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello CycloneYoris, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of storms named Hugo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of storms named Hugo.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Conyo14}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Conyo14 (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You might remember me, But we actually share the SAME WikiBirthday (first edit day)! February 4th! Wow! What a coincidence and thank you for helping an editor in need! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're most certainly welcome, and it sure is a coincidence that we share the same wikibirthday! Thank you for telling me this, and for stopping by to say hi. I honestly appreciate it. :D CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No Problem Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 21:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Im the user that submitted changes to the Free and Open source article a couple hours ago

Seems like you didnt approve my changes because the external link I added seemed to be promotional. Im not sure how would I prove this, but it was not. To be honest with you, I speak native Spanish and I can see the fragmentation of free software community solely because of the word "free" on english. But even then, from time to time I see native English speakers mention "libre" alongside "free" when explaining from the concept scratch to emphasize its about freedom. I think a way of proving my legitimacy is that if you search the literal string "libreware" on Google, libreware.org shows first, above en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software, which was frankly me seeking to read about Free Software on wikipedia how I discovered the site, as well as to keep into account that "libre software" and "libreware" are mentioned there on the lead section, so thats my reasoning

I did make other changes apart adding an external link, which I think simplify the lead section, but I admit were a bit too aggressive. I am aware of my bias towards libreware because of my native language, but I tried not to endorse a personal opinion within the submitted changes

I would like the article to have the changes I made to the lead section, with or without the external link, and maybe with some fine tunes over to satisfy some standard I may have not take into account or anything else. Please reconsider,

Thanks :) 181.91.17.29 (talk) 03:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply