Fivemack

Welcome!

Hello, Fivemack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 16:46, 20 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Bond insurance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 10:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Pierpont_log_distribution.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have done some major edits to cubic Hermite spline, that ended up leaving your recent contribution on the ${\displaystyle \mathrm {CINT} _{x}}$  function sligthly out of context. Would you mind helping out on this issue? I am not quite sure yet how your function arises (though I have my guesses that I haven't had time to prove yet), that is crucial in order to put it into the correct context. Cheers. --Berland (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

CINT really lives under 'cubic interpolation' rather than 'cubic Hermite spline' - it's the obvious way of doing one-dimensional cubic interpolation if you have values on an even grid and don't care about derivatives. The right answer in a longer run, I think, is to have cubic interpolation be an article in its own right rather than a redirect, pull across CINT_x to that article, and then have a paragraph about why you really want to care about derivatives and a link to cubic Hermite spline. Feel free to do that now if you want, or I'll have a look later - it's 1:15am here and I'm not awake enough to move large chunks of article around Fivemack (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

What I wonder, is that your formula will occur from possibly the finite difference formula stated on that page, given a regular grid, and scaled to the unit interval. If that is the case, it belongs under cubic Hermite spline. Anyway, I don't think we should separate 'cubic interpolation' from 'cubic hermite spline', because of the uniqueness theorem on the unit interval. Your formula has to correspond to a specific choice of tangents. --Berland (talk) 06:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

PS: You may use the one or more 'colons' to indent your paragraphs to ease reading on talk pages. Cheers.

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paul Zimmermann, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Don't tag the elder, I know, but this is so much easier. Sebastian scha. (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think maybe just adding some references to his publications might be enough. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Fivemack. Just a brief note to let you know that I've wikified your article Yaogan and tagged it as in need of references. I sense that you have substantive material here that's worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia, but without verifiable references it will probably become a candidate for deletion. I'm a bit pressed for time at the moment, else I'd hunt around for and add sources. Would you add what you can find to the article? Thanks & regards, Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 17:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the wikification. It's quite difficult to give references for anything beyond the existence of the satellites - is it really worth citing the very bland Xinhua news-agency announcements of the launches? I doubt anyone who knows for sure the characteristics of Chinese recon satellites is contractually permitted to tell us, and I've not seen amateur images of Yaogan or indications that anything might be transmitting in a radar-like way; the orbits are essentially identical and are classic imaging-satellite orbits. What do you suggest? Should I see if Aviation Week has a better write-up? Fivemack (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the Xinhua pieces are pretty bland, though that adjective is rightfully ascribed to most sources I found dealing with the subject. Regardless, the Xinhua pieces are legitimate sources; I've used one. Overall, I've cited several more sources, cleaned up the language a bit more, separated each satellite's NORAD ID from its International code in the table. I've also removed the article tags, as I think it's now sufficiently referenced. The article could still use more meat, but I think it's somewhere around or a bit beyond Start-Class. See what you think. Regards, Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 14:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again, that's much better. I will put in more meat if I find any, but I imagine conclusive information about Chinese spy satellites is not going to be easy to find. Fivemack (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I like your rewording here. --Doradus (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Macroketone 2D structure.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jacques Vanneste has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines for academics . Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I assume he's notable under academic notability criterion 2 for winning the Adams Prize (most prestigious UK maths prize) in 2010, but I don't know how to undelete the article in order to put that information in Fivemack (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Arctic shelf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

So far the article is just a dictionary definition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good Evening,

Just looking over your new page, Swarts flourination, as part of the new page patrol. Antimony trifluoride seems to cover the same topic. I wonder if you should instead try to improve that page rather than have a seperate one. Nihola (talk) 05:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good point; have set up the redirect and moved the content into SbF3 Fivemack (talk) 14:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Middle Level Navigations, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC).Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boxworth village sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Longstowe, Cambs village sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on NATCO Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Svgalbertian (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article IProfile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet criteria for WP:ORG and WP:NWEB

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Syringammina fragilissima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• is giant single cell |author=Michael Marshall |journal=[[New Scientist]] |date=February 3, 2010}}</ref> It was the first xenophyophore to be described,<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Deep Sea

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Relic-of-St-Charles-Lwango.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

What we need is a message from you stating the copyright status of the image, please have a look at the list here for common types of license tags. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:39, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I cannot determine the copyright status of the image - it's a work of 3D art by a person who hasn't been dead seventy years, so the status depends on whether the reliquary counts as being on 'permanent public display' and I'm not keen to bother the cathedral about that Fivemack (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spreadtrum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |publisher=wsj.com |accessdate=2014-Jan-11}}</ref>; the deal completed on 23 December 2013<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwgeeks/article/Tsinghua-Unigroup-Completes-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the LAMOST page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 704 Interamnia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Goffin's 2014 astrometric reanalysis gives an even lower mass of 2.725 ± 0.12{{E|19}} kg (and has 3.00 ± 0.1 {{E|19}} kg for [[511 Davida]].<ref>{{cite arXiv|eprint=1402.4241v1}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Thomas, re: your edit to Geography of Bolivia, according to the WikiBlame tool (which is linked as "Revision history search" on the history page), that vandalism was introduced to the article in February 2008, so it had lasted in the article for over six years! Graham87 02:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Fivemack,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NBASE-T for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Robvanvee 16:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to NBASE-T, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Robvanvee 17:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SW Sextantis variable, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Chelsea Foods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced advert

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wolfson5 (talk) 02:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ThrustMe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThrustMe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 07:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article CIFG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The company was acquired in 2016 source and at this moment is non existent. I have tried to find IRS of the earlier times, but there are just passing mentions, significant coverage wasn't detected.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Less Unless (talk) 21:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply