Abishe

 

Dear all participants and organizers,

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, all the postcards are postponed due to the shut down of the postal system all over the world. Hope all the postcards can arrive as soon as the postal system return and please take good care.

Best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2020.03

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Wishing you and your family a safe, healthy, and prosperous new year!

 

Mithila Madawa Gunathilake (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2021 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

 

The article Raja Bheema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

 

The article Khaki (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

 

The article Maayon (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

 

The article Un Kadhal Irundhal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No evidence of completing filming or being released, nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

hello can you help about this?

i create Judo at the Deaflympics but is not good.

i find good source :

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:%C3%89preuve_aux_Deaflympics

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_aux_Deaflympics

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handball_aux_Deaflympics

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach-volley_aux_Deaflympics

Hello Abishe,

 

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

 

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

 

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

•   Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
•   Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
•   Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

You are receiving this message because you participated in the Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 as an organizer or editor.

 

Dear all,

The Wikipedia Asian Month 2023[1] is coming ! The campaign start within a flexible 30 days from November to December. Following with the changes of the rules made by last year, the wish to have more people get to know Asia and Asian related topic is the same! Click "Here" to Organize/Join a WAM Event.

1. Propose "Focus Theme" related to Asia !

If you are based somewhere in Asia, or have specific passion on an Asian topic, please propose your "Focus Theme" by October 25th. The WAM international team will select 5 themes. Please propose your focus theme through this link[2].

2. Enhancing existing articles can also count as part of campaign contribution.

Any edits, including creating new articles or adding new content to existing articles, over 3000 bytes in total would be able to get a reward. Last year, due to this change of rules, the Programs & Events Dashboard was suggested. However, according to community survey of 2022, Fountain Tool is still the best platform for tracking edit and points. You don’t need to create any Dashboard. For the tracking of editing existing article, the international team is currently designing a form. Will soon publish to the main page of WAM 2023.

3. More flexible campaign time

The contribution duration would remain 30days, but we extended the overall campaign timeline to 2 months. All organizers can decide when to start their WAM as long as the whole duration is within November 1st to December 31th. It means that you can participate in WAM based on the needs of your local community.

Timetable

• October 1st, 2023 : Publish International Campaign Page of the Year
• October 5th to 25th, 2023 : Call for focus themes of WAM 2023.
• Before 29 October, 2023: Complete Registration [3] of Each language Wikipedia.
• November 1st, UTC 00:00 to December 31th, UTC 00:00, 2023: Running the Campaign. (Find your local campaign for the actual event date.)
• January 1st to March 15th, 2024: Auditing of each language Wikipedia.
• March 30th, 2024: Deadline of reporting statistics and eligible editors to the International Team
• April 1st to May 15th, 2024: The international team distributes Barnstars and Certificates to eligible editors of each event.

For your information, the main page of Wikipedia Asian Month is currently undertaking a reconstruction for archiving purpose. For the 2023 event please bookmarked this page. We hope you will enjoy Wikipedia Asian Month! If you have any inquiry, feel free to contact us by info@asianmonth.wiki [4]. We look forward to your participation.

Cheers!!!

WAM 2023 International Team

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023

[2] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfPLz8kvSP_0LlI4vGRHAP2ydJPnLY__1hb9-p8AsRcS2R2NQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023/Join_an_Event

[4] info@asianmonth.wiki

I am deeply satisfied with your work (long articles). The only complaint I have not include YouTube videos from unofficial channels. DareshMohan (talk) 05:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DareshMohan: Hello. Thank you for the appreciation and kind words. Basically I have the knack of writing really lengthy articles and that habit has eventually transpired into even at my workplace LOL with writing some essay type mails through Microsoft Outlook. I think you are referring to the YouTube links which I shared them as sources in Kavundampalayam and that is one area I really need to go back to the drawing board and stick to the basics of Wikipedia guidelines. Anyway glad to note that people admire my work although there are key areas for improvement. Abishe (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you make articles for Thavasi (actor) [1] and Vengal Rao [2]? DareshMohan (talk) 00:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DareshMohan: Hey to be honest to create articles about these film actors, the mainstream media hasn't done anything special in terms of covering about their real life stories, struggles and what are the professional career achievements they have attained. For example I wrote article for comedian actress Rangammal but the sources repeatedly told facts about her in 2 or 3 lines and sentences. I only found more about her career through her exclusive interview available in YouTube which she gave sometime back where she tells about having acted alongside M. G. Ramachandran and the worst part is only after her death media reports about who she was and they never make much effort or research in capturing the important milestones in her career. The same problem lies with Vengal Rao as most of the sources only had detailed explanation about his health conditions being worsened but only talks less about his career like he worked as a stuntman for some popular actors and then he worked with Vadivelu over 30 films. There is no further information to speak of about him in first place. The media hasn't done enough to give attention to such individuals. The media only gives importance to high-profile actors and celebrities for viewership and target rating point to grab audience attention especially covering about those who are immensely popular. Abishe (talk) 07:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I feel Thadi Balaji and Bayilvan Ranganathan both deserve articles. Both deleted several times -- do sources existed? DareshMohan (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DareshMohan: Ahh, I mean article on Thadi Balaji is currently not possible at the moment as the page is currently protected and it requires a special approval to proceed further [Require administrator access]. Actually I wrote this article way back in June 2018, but it was deleted due to an afd discussion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thadi Balaji (2nd nomination). I tried to claim that the subject should be able to meet WP:GNG guidelines since he has done numerous roles in films and took part in the Bigg Boss contest in it's second season, but the suggestion was rejected as I only started editing Wikipedia around that corner so I realised I may not have sufficient claim to prove my credibility at that time. Hopefully fingers are crossed to create article about him in near future. Abishe (talk) 07:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wanted to create an article on Chaplin Balu but found no reliable sources but now I found two! [3] [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to create an article on RmKV but Draft:RmKV got deleted since it was a stub and I think it wasn't neutral (since the sources praised it I think). See User_talk:Kailash29792/Archive_48#Stores and User_talk:Kailash29792/Archive_49#Your submission at Articles for creation: RmKV (July 26). DareshMohan (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you help with Draft:Rahul Thatha? DareshMohan (talk) 02:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you add Bava Lakshmanan [5]? DareshMohan (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The Special Barnstar
		How are you able to create so many articles. Creating over 1000+ articles is a remarkable feat (very very small percentage does it). You are legendary! DareshMohan (talk) 07:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DareshMohan: Thank you for the appreciation and acknowledging my efforts. I think you are also doing an amazing work in writing many articles. I am so passionate about gaining knowledge and sharing knowledge to others in whatever capacity I could contribute eventhough I may have flaws from my end. I try to learn everyday because life never stops teaching. I still have to do a lot of research and create more articles. Abishe (talk) 07:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The highlight is that many people use Wikipedia, but not many edit it — and I feel embarrassed for admitting I edit here. Many admins I think don't mass create articles -- I don't think you are admins. Any creating anywhere over 1,000 or more is very rare. I have many regrets in my life, but ... one day we all will make it. I don't think I can leave Wikipedia for video games or anything else, cause it is ok to be different. 😎 I also feel welcome here. Not sure if all of them introverts are here cause them extroverts busy socializing. DareshMohan (talk) 08:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DareshMohan: Hi, I understand your thought process but you don't need to feel embarrassed to edit Wikipedia. You are doing a great job. Hopefully you will continue to do good work in Wikipedia and you have a great track record of 90,000+ edits in 3 years, you too have done a great job in terms of creating articles as you have created over 500 articles that's a great accomplishment and your edit count is a terrific record which speaks volume about your ability to showcase your talents and skillets by creating quality content. I feel those who are very much interested with Wikipedia and devote, allocate certain time slot to Wikipedia would value it as an integral part of their lives. I use Wikipedia as a stress relief and as a positive distraction from all the real life practical situations. I see it as a hobby and to positively impact myself to forget job stress and yeah obviously I am not much into socialising. I am also an introvert and with some extrovert characteristics, but I prefer to edit Wikipedia because I am so eager to write more and more articles. It's because of the thirst for general knowledge thing also it comes into my mind naturally. Every human is unique and make sure you do what you like because only you can decide the level of inner peace in you and only you understand your true passion. Don't compare yourself with others and be the person you are. We are all different and have different thinking patterns and belief systems. It is normal to worry about things and stuff which I do tend to think a lot. Socialising is sometimes difficult for me due to the need of meeting different kind of people who have different mindsets and most importantly it may not be easy to vibe with them as our taste could vary as well. Be true to yourself and do what is best for you. You are the CEO of your own life. Keep up your fine work. Abishe (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tysm! DareshMohan (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've raised your continued issues with coyvio / close paraphrasing, this time at Taifa-1, at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 October 28. Fram (talk) 12:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media:   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

 

The article Tian Qi (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I started a discussion at WP:ANI#Abishe's problematic article creations, suggesting that your autopatrolled right would be removed and/or other sanctions. You are welcome to give your input there. Fram (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is   AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion,   BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place,   Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are:   Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points,   Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points,   BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points,   Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and   AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

•   Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
•   Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
•   MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
•   Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
•   BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
•   Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
•   Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
•   BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
•   Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's a nice one! :) I've thought of writing that but never got around to doing it. Cheers! Chanaka L (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Chanakal: Choon Paan too was in my mind for a long time as I felt it could be apt to write about it for the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month/2024 competition, considering how Choon Paan is seen as sentimental element for majority of the Sri Lankans. Abishe (talk) 01:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahla Parveen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahla Parveen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can't appreciate your work enough... would want to say thanks 100 times. DareshMohan (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Keshini Ann Suraweera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 20:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Hazem Helmy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't seem to find any sources on him beyond the listed databases. The arzwiki is no better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

JayCubby Talk

05:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)