BenStein69

  Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Cassie J. Sneider has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re your message: I have restored the article to your user space at User:BenStein69/Cassie J. Sneider. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Barack Obama. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 03:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Jauerback. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Seth MacFarlane, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I had deleted this because my mind interpreted black comedy as something else, in which case I know What About Bob is not! Sorry about that.Charger2 (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to German American, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 19:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Herbert (Family Guy). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.: The Article clearly states "Henry defines Herbert as a pedophile" this is not the same as Gay. Tyros1972 Talk 20:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Haight-Ashbury, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to CatDog, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meaty Beaty Big and Bouncy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Todd James Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willow Springs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Amaury. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Atlantic Records, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kath Soucie, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

• I don't mind your continuing to try to find a reliable source for Soucie's birth date, but, thus far, you have repeatedly failed. Therefore, I suggest if you think you have found a reliable source, don't change the article. Instead, open a topic on the talk page of the article and list the source for others to evaluate. Otherwise, if you continue to add critical material to a WP:BLP without a reliable source, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

To expand and edify, the problem with those sources were threefold: 1) IMDb is supported by user-contributions with no clear editorial oversight, which makes it unreliable as a source. 2) CelebrityNetWorth has a similar problem with no clear editorial policy or presumed amount of fact-checking. 3) The RottenTomatoes reference states in the first paragraph that the article came from Wikipedia. Since we can't use Wikipedia as a source, that is problematic as well. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, BenStein69, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Cristy C. Road, appears to be directly copied from http://zinewiki.com/Cristy_Road. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Cristy C. Road if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cristy C. Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bust, Bad Habits, Support, Bitch and Indestructible

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Cristy C. Road requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://zinewiki.com/Cristy_Road. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bihco (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of U.S. state dinosaurs. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Fyrael (talk) 01:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ted (film), you may be blocked from editing. Areaseven (talk) 06:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alf, US Championship, Jurassic Park and World Tour

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, BenStein69. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cassie J. Sneider, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Cassie J. Sneider to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Ibadibam (talk) 23:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krampus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christmas on Bear Mountain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palatine uvula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All God's Chillun Got Wings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hondells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Leaves for the Orient, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Kaplan and John Sanborn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, why did you revert this edit which brought the quotation marks at Frank Leaves for the Orient in conformity with MOS:QUOTEMARKS? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Abel Maldonado. TJRC (talk) 03:29, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism isn't cool or freaky, sir. 198.144.40.1 (talk) 22:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at List of cakes, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Reify-tech (talk) 00:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in this edit you added quite a few wikilinks to Rocko's Modern Life. Though I think you meant well, per WP:OVERLINK, wikilinks should be used to link to relevant subjects that will expand our understanding of the subject, the TV series, but should not be used for common words and concepts like "immigrant", "adult humor" and "gluttonous". It is presumed that readers have some basic comprehension of English that would allow them to understand the context of the article without linking to every other word, and overlinking distracts from the article content. For more info, please read WP:OVERLINK. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  In a recent edit to the page Jewish humor, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Atom and His Package albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Ben Aaron Simon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 05:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Songs about food, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adult animation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sources added do not support the claim made. Additionally, the curious idea that Word Girl is for adults is contrary to all reliable sources which make clear that the show is for young children. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page if you disagree. SummerPhD (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Led Zeppelin IV. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 20:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agree, stop changing genre's without sources or consensus. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Glenn Quagmire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to My Big Fat Geek Wedding. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Junipero Serra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. I have removed the category you added to the article. If there are reliable sources for JS's inclusion, please cite them in the article and add the relevant content. Thank you. Writegeist (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Norm Macdonald. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The category you added was unsupported by the article, as required. DonIago (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello BenStein69,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Asriel Dreemurr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mduvekot (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to American Pie 2, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of English words of Yiddish origin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hertz1888 (talk) 05:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of English words of Yiddish origin, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 13:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I reverted an edit of yours, I thanked you just so I could log it. Per WP:BLP please do not revert it without talkpage consensus -https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steve_Bannon&diff=750296783&oldid=750287746 ta Govindaharihari (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am warning you now, do not replace those categories, I will request your blocking if you do without talkpage consensus. Govindaharihari (talk) 20:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:2017 mixtape albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 14:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please note that per WP:IPCV, pop culture references must be supported by citations to third-party sources that establish not only the existence of the references, but that they were considered significant in some manner. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Kendall-K1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Niagara (painter and singer), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kendall-K1 (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Dancing in the Street.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I really want to assume good faith with regards to your adding Category:2017 singles here, but you've received many warnings for adding unsourced information to articles, and this appears to be another case of you adding information that can't be clearly verified. You really need to exercise better diligence going forward. DonIago (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi BenStein69, and thanks for your edit and summary here. Can I encourage you to please always leave an edit summary to explain your edits and save on duplication of work? Best wishes Captainllama (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Chicken Dance, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Hayley and the Crushers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, BenStein69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hayley and the Crushers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, BenStein69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hayley and the Crushers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mark Ferrari. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello BenStein69, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, James Cushing (poet), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Cushing (poet).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, BenStein69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Ferrari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, BenStein69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Ferrari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply