Dclemens1971
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Nomination of Steve Maina for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Maina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Joel Millanguir for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Millanguir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Your GA nomination of Forest Building
editThe article Forest Building you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forest Building for comments about the article, and Talk:Forest Building/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award
edit| The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia | ||
| This award is given in recognition to Dclemens1971 for accumulating at least 500 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award
edit|
Rack and pinion Award | ||
| This award is given in recognition to Dclemens1971 for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
Do not delete Fievel's Playland page
editPlease do not delete it, please keep it forever, it should have its own page. don't delete it 70.167.159.125 (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion will take place and the community will decide. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- How can I join the discussion, I am desperate to save it please! 70.167.159.125 (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Removed G3 tag from Immaculate Constellation
editHey, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the G3 tag from Immaculate Constellation, as I don't think it qualified as a hoax There ARE non-hoax sources available, albeit incredibly limited. It feels more like the author saw something, asked an AI to write an article in good faith, and it just hallucinated a lot of things; its probably also WP:TOO SOON for an article. Cheers! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Guessitsavis Yeah, the sources I saw it in were all deprecated at WP:RSP so it def had the flavor of a hoax/conspiracy theory, especially combined with the fake citations to nonexistent sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Really? I didn't think NewsNation got deprecated, I didn't see it at RSP. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 18:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
RM closure procedure
editHey Dclemens1971, this is just a friendly reminder that when closing moves, be sure to remove the requested move template in the section on the talk page. When you closed Talk:Tico and Friends#Requested move 8 October 2024, it seems the template was left behind. You can see I've removed the template here. Also, you left a generic {{old move}} talkpage banner, but its always a good idea to make sure to fill in the parameters. If you don't want to have to do this manually, consider some user scripts that do this: I've recently installed BilledMammal's Move+ script. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bobby Cohn Thanks for the pointer and the correction. I wanted to try my hand at closing a move discussion and this seemed like an appropriate one. I appreciate the guidance. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the team! Bobby Cohn (talk) 23:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
@Dclemens1971, article, was delete on (AFD_link) now again created by a new sleeper-sock (Lordo'Web) account, draft was submitted by This IP & IP was blocked in true block evasion. Page was first time created by (R2dra)[1] check plz g4 & g5 apply here to many new socks should also be block. Many other slipper sock accounts also found with evidences. Some actions salting these titles and strick against against these sock required.
- [Lordo'Web // WikiWhizKid1999][8][9]
Largely overlapping socks with master
One another user also liking to be slipper sock account ==> (Prabhanshu Singh Rajput).[14][15]
Los Juglares del Dexas
editJust asking as I'm on the New Pages Patrol. Why did you contest the soft deletion of that article? Tavantius (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there @Tavantius. It was nominated by a sockpuppet where both sock and master have a long history of disruptive AfD participation. The sock had made several poor nominations with no evidence of BEFOREs done. I have no objection to a speedy good-faith renomination; my request for refund was procedural to avoid rewarding a disruptive sock. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info! Tavantius (talk) 23:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
WP:CREATIVE interpretations
editHi Dclemens1971 -- Genuine question -- have you had much luck arguing the one-work interpretation in AfD? I can't even recall the last time I've seen it argued that way, but I've largely been hibernating since January. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Espresso Addict I don't recall any particular time I argued it, but I don't recall any time I saw a debate in which a requirement for multiple works was imposed, and the one-work interpretation seems like the plain reading of the policy. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)