Walsh90210
|
|
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Korean church cleanup
editThanks for starting the one-by-one AfD cleanup of all these denominations. It’s very helpful if you can ping participants in the earlier group nom, just in case I don’t see the one-offs. I’ve done a little previous cleanup of Cryx88’s creations, many of which have very problematic sourcing. Any article whose sole source is Reformiert-online likely needs to go through AfD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
FYI
editSince the shouting's all over at ANI, I thought I'd explain a point you raised there. The reason there's that barrage of DO NOT CHANGE hidden notes is that, after undoing the 10th person who just didn't bother to read it [1][2][3], I figured that if I put a separate note between every letter of every word, they couldn't possibly miss them. See [4]. And it's worked ever since! EEng 01:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
added footnote edit reverted
editHi Walsh90210, I've checked the comment on the delete/revert of the footnote which doesn't seem to explain your reason and purpose. Could you elaborate perhaps? In the mean time I have reverted your revert of the footnote. cheers Rockycape (t • c •g) 04:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- A footnote of
Downball requires a wall or a squares court depending on which version of Downball is being played.
on the very first word of an article is inappropriate. Footnotes like that are generally used for things such as pronunciation, not to include a sentence that could be in the lead section if it were written well. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- It was another editor that gave a talk recently about using notes more often especially in articles that need more hands on deck to build the article. They recommended more frequent notes in an article in the situation where there's not much discussion on the article talk page because this is a good way of engaging more readers and editors. And it seems that's what happened when you noticed the note and made an edit and it seems it's working as intended. Rockycape (t • c •g) 07:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)