 | Mountain blackeye has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 22, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Mountain blackeye appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
Mountain blackeye
- ... that mountain blackeyes (pictured) are among the species known to have a symbiotic relationship with Low's pitcher-plants? Source: Chin, Lijin; Moran, Jonathan A. & Clarke, Charles (April 2010). "Trap geometry in three giant montane pitcher plant species from Borneo is a function of tree shrew body size". The New Phytologist. 186 (2): 461–470. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03166.x. JSTOR 27797568.
- ALT1:... that although its range is restricted to the island of Borneo, the mountain blackeye (pictured) has evolved into four subspecies? Source: Gill, Frank; Donsker, David; Rasmussen, Pamela (2021). "Sylviid babblers, parrotbills, white-eyes". IOC World Bird List. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
- Reviewed: Mitten
5x expanded by MeegsC (talk). Self-nominated at 17:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC).
Size and expansion date check out; well-referenced to reliable sources; spot checks and Earwig indicate CLP/copyvio not a likely concern, QPQ done. Good to go. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mountain blackeye/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CaptainEek (talk · contribs) 21:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Howdy hello! Nice work here. My comments:
- "Habitat and range" should be "Distribution and habitat" per the WP:BIRD standard.
Done
- "Conservation and threats" should be titled "Status"
- "Voice" header should be "vocalizations"
- Subspecies still should be put in the infobox. You can use Template:specieslist, it will automatically format the authorities and dates
- Yes, sorry. Ypna added that in February, and I'll admit I didn't notice. Fixed now.
- In text, subspecies should be formatted as *A. b. subspeciesis (Authority, 2021) – Yadda yadda yadda
- I'm sorry, I'm not clear on what you want here. Are you saying I should remove the text I currently have and replace it with this abbreviated form instead? I'm wondering because this format was fine according to the FA reviewers, per red warbler.
- Ah, nevermind then, that will do fine :)
- I'm sorry, I'm not clear on what you want here. Are you saying I should remove the text I currently have and replace it with this abbreviated form instead? I'm wondering because this format was fine according to the FA reviewers, per red warbler.
- Synonym needs a bullet point, authority, and year. Also surprised at only one synonym, I'd double check for more.
- The only other synonyms are all the various subspecies with Chlorocharis rather than Zosterops as the genus. Shall I include those as well?
- Thanks for double checking, that won't be necessary
- The only other synonyms are all the various subspecies with Chlorocharis rather than Zosterops as the genus. Shall I include those as well?
- Wikilink "clinal"
- It's already linked in the lede; should I link it again in the article?
- Yes, I say link it again.
a link may be repeated ... at the first occurrence after the lead.
- Yes, I say link it again.
- It's already linked in the lede; should I link it again in the article?
- Wikilink first mention of "sabah" and "sarawak", remove links from later mentions
- You've already mentioned the ranges of the subspecies, so no need to say them again in the description.
- "commonest" --> most common
- I have changed this at your request, but please note that "commonest" is an accepted word in all dictionaries. ;)
- Huh, interesting. Perhaps its just my local English vernacular, but I don't think I've ever heard it said, or seen it used.
- I have changed this at your request, but please note that "commonest" is an accepted word in all dictionaries. ;)
- wl Brunei in the lead
- References look good for the GA level, nicely organized
- Updated to all 13-digit ISBNs and provided page numbers for all citations.
- Ooh, good catch
- Updated to all 13-digit ISBNs and provided page numbers for all citations.
- I tried to find some more images on Flickr for you, but all copyrighted :(
- Yes, I've scoured flickr and ccsearch, with no luck. I'll have to try harder on my next visit to Borneo!
Otherwise, seems good! Ping me when you get that all sorted out. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- CaptainEek, sorry it has taken me so long to get to this. WP pinged me when you picked up the nomination, but didn't let me know you'd actually posted anything, so I didn't see it until today. I have a few questions for you (see above) but most things are now sorted. MeegsC (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- @MeegsC: That's a pass! I only had one more thing for you to fix, so I just did it myself cus it was simple. Nice job, let me know if you take it to FA so I can chime in there too :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review CaptainEek. I really appreciate the care you take. MeegsC (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- @MeegsC: That's a pass! I only had one more thing for you to fix, so I just did it myself cus it was simple. Nice job, let me know if you take it to FA so I can chime in there too :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)