User talk:KEmel49/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:KEmel49. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Little Danes experiment
(fa:آزمایش دانمارکی‌های کوچک)

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

The little Danes experiment was a 1951 Danish operation where 22 Greenlandic Inuit children were sent to Danish foster families in an attempt to re-educate them as "little Danes". While the children were all supposed to be orphans, most were not. Six children were adopted while in Denmark, and sixteen returned to Greenland, only to be placed in Danish-speaking orphanages and never live with their families again. Half of the children experienced mental health disturbances, and half of them died in young adulthood. The government of Denmark officially apologised in 2020, after several years of demands from Greenlandic officials.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here • Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @KEmel49, thanks for noticing my changes. I am building up the page gradually and I always leaving it in a consistent state so if someone reads it, it is better than how it was in the previous version. I am saving as little as possible to avoid publishing the page in an inconsistent state. I don't agree that the changes I made are redundant. For example my changes added that the technology is now commoditized and is available on many devices (iPhone, meta quest, Apple Vision Pro) and I am adding a paragraph about the significance of the technology to the visual effects and movie industry - as multiple academy awards (oscars) were given to the developers of such technologies. Your revert happened just before I added the reference to this.

I am also depth that is missing in the current article about the importance of capturing micro expressions with motion capture (which is not easy to do with animation) and the concept of facial motion capture transfer - which is very important in the industry and doesn't appear in the page. On a next edit I will references to scientific article discussing both concepts.

The reason I don't want to use a sandbox is that I want to make incremental value immediately. If I wait until I have all the changes in, it will take longer for others to benefit from the contributions. This is why I always leave the page in a consistent state - which is better that the previous edit. Another challenge with working with a sandbox is that if I take several days or weeks to edit a page in the sandbox, the original page may change and merging my change will be more challenging. If I do smaller changed in the sandbox, the number of edits will still be high.

I am wonder what triggered your action - the number of changes, the small time between the edits, etc.?

I hope you will see the value in the changes I am doing and will allow me to continue my work. ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Please help me understand what I did wrong so I don't do it again. I could not tell from your note. Your help is much appreciated @KEmel49 ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

@ThothOfTheSouth, Please see WP:MOS, WP:ACM and WP:WBA. In your this edit, you have replaced whole section with non-cited texts which is against guideline of Wikipedia
Also i see that you are asking what had triggered me to take such action on your edit, well that's because your edit was against simple guidelines. still if you think i did something wrong feel free to ask me here. Thank you.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 09:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

@KEmel49 you removed my section before I added a the cited section. The previous section was really poor and I could improve it because it was really out of date and irrelevant. @KEmel49, I will get my section back with citations as a single edit. ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

@ThothOfTheSouth In that case first gather all references and edit at your sandbox as it would be a testing edit. do not remove any content or replace anything without references. if you can't dedicate enough time at a moment, do edit at sandbox one by one then only apply at main article. Furthermore, any changes without satisfactory reason or citation would be reverted. if you think that any paragraph, section or whole article Facial motion capture have no references then you can add {{Citation needed}}, {{Unreferenced section}}, {{Citation style}} or {{More citation needed}} based on situation.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 15:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey there! I saw you had undone my revision of the History of Cape Verde page, specifically re-entering a citation for the book "Atlantis in the Atlantic." This book is not a reliable source. If anything, it's an anti-source, as it's an ancient aliens book that should in no way be used to discuss the history of Cape Verde. I was hoping to better understand your rationale for reinstating it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quaoarian (talk • contribs) 12:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Quaoarian, Thank you for look after that edit. Look at your edit. you added an URL^(bare) and removed another one. but i just added the one you removed and the one you added stays as it is. if you think or found that the Atlantis in the Caribbean: And the Comet That Changed the World at Google Books reference is not reliable to that topic or paragraph you can add {{Unreliable sources?}} at the reference.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 13:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Got it, will do! Quaoarian (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm new to editing like very new and don't know fully how to yet and I have always wanted to know where this ship was built exactly and where that place is today and I recently did so I wanted to add it to the page so others who may wonder about the same topic could figure it out quickly and easily. If possible please edit my edit so that it makes more sense. Thank you. Littletimmyxyz (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Littletimmyxyz, Thank you for taking a look at my edit. at SS America (1898), you have done this edit. which was undone by me as it was unsourced. I see you have done the same edit again here but now you have added reference which make all the differences. hope you understand.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 17:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Littletimmyxyz (talk) 17:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Kharayeb

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

Kharayeb (Arabic: الخرايب) is a historic town in the Sidon District in the South Governorate, Lebanon. The town is 77 km (48 mi) south of Beirut, and stands at an average altitude of 190 m (620 ft) above sea level. The town boasts a rich historical legacy, with archaeological excavations revealing a complex settlement history spanning from Prehistory to the Ottoman period. Notably, Kharayeb's origins can be traced back to the Persian period (539–330 BC), when it played a pivotal role in the region's agricultural and economic landscape, culminating in the construction of its Phoenician temple around the 6th century BC.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey bro i want your help personally bcz some user deleted my pages and they are big pages i am not here to redirect prataprao gujar i am here to need help with from some indian users if you help me plz send req me on insta it’s urgent bro please @tejaspratihar on instagram please Mihirhastin (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey, Mihirhastin, Your edit to Prataprao Gujar seems to have problem and that's why reverted by me. anyway i cannot help you in any other social media platform, feel free to reach me here. if you want to join India related WikiProjects you can join here.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 16:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

No brother, I don't need help on social media. I was just telling you about the means of communication. Leave that aside. Just help me this much. My old and blocked ID was blocked by some people due to casteism. You just help me in removing a page named Timli State which has complete sources and is without any mistake from the redirect. That page was deleted by a user due to casteism. Mihirhastin (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you give me your old Username and the page link that got deleted.kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 17:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Ap wada karey meri id block to ni kragey please Mihirhastin (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't have any right to block or unblock any person on wikipedia.kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 17:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Assuming your testimonials, if you had started the page Timli state your old account was maybe Tejas pratihar which was blocked as a sockpuppet. now you have to get your old account unblocked through the process and as you have given enough proof here for that your account may got blocked per WP:MULTIPLE. Do remember, i dont have any right to get your any account blocked or unblocked.kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 18:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Assam at the North East Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Christmas horror
(es:Terror navideño)

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

Christmas horror is a fiction genre and film genre that incorporates horror elements into a seasonal setting. It is popular in multiple countries.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Placenta cake
(simple:Placenta cake)

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

Placenta cake is a dish from ancient Greece and Rome consisting of many dough layers interspersed with a mixture of cheese and honey and flavored with bay leaves, baked and then covered in honey. The dessert is mentioned in classical texts such as the Greek poems of Archestratos and Antiphanes, as well as the De agri cultura of Cato the Elder. It is often seen as the predecessor of baklava and börek.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Trisomy 16

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

Trisomy 16 is a chromosomal abnormality in which there are 3 copies of chromosome 16 rather than two. It is the most common trisomy leading to miscarriage and the second most common chromosomal cause of it, closely following X-chromosome monosomy. About 6% of miscarriages have trisomy 16.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi there. I've removed the {{More citations needed}} tag from the lead of The Manhasset per WP:CITELEAD. As a heads-up, the lead section does not need citations as long as everything in the lead is cited in the body; the lead is intended as a summary of cited content in the body of the article. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

yet the other two paragraphs are uncited - proposing to add {{Cn}} though.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 17:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

These other two paragraphs are part of the lead, and are cited in the body. Additionally, Template:Citation needed/doc says "Within a lead section that is clearly written as a summary of a substantially sourced article, statements that are supported with citations within the body of the article should not be tagged,
statements that are not supported in the article body should be tagged with {{Not verified in body}}." As such, that template is also not appropriate. I suggest you read WP:CITELEAD before making these edits. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)