User talk:JMvanDijk

Welcome to Wikipedia, JMvanDijk! I am Abhishek191288 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

—Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 13:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a good signature: JMvanDijk ^talk

Thank you for uploading File:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Howard family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord High Admiral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited House of Habsburg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tirol, Order of Leopold and Order of St. Stephen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been tarting up the article House of Baux. It appears that on 3 February 2012 you copied a table into the article from French Wikipedia. As far as I can tell the original was created by User:Furmeyer back on 38 January 2008 for an article called fr:Liste des seigneurs des Baux.

Three points:

1. Please read the guideline Copying within Wikipedia on how to attribute text.
2. If the foreign language Wikiepdia does not contain adequate levels of inline citations, then the text is going to fail the English language levels of OR, so don't copy it into the English language version.
3. If you copy text from another language Wikiepdia please translate it. In the case of the copy you made of from fr:Liste des seigneurs des Baux you did not translate the citation and you left lots of links to the French article in the text. It is generally considered a bad idea to do that as red links inform editors that more articles need to be written. If someone wants to follow the links in another language they can always go to the left of the window and select the language they wish to follow. -- PBS (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- PBS (talk) 20:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I put the footnotes where they were in the text using "group=lower-alpha" and list defined references (LDRs) simply because it was the easiest way to place what was already there into a reftag structure without a large change to the text. I have now moved them down to the ==Notes== section, but we can move them back up if you prefer the former location.

I am not exactly clear what it is that you would like some help with (although I appreciate that ref tags pairs, LDRs and citation templates are very confusing the first few times one uses them -- You might like to read Help:Footnote -- but as you say it is often easier to understand what is happening if one can see an example one is working on. So can we start with this citation:

"The first Count of Les Baux, whose name alone we know, was Leibulf, whose son Pons, or Poncius, owned large lands in Argence Old Provence - Page 127, de Theodore Andrea Cook - 1905"

What is the full citation to Cook? (book title, volume (if more than one) and publisher)-- PBS (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) JMvanDijk (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)don't have this one. This was posted on the French Wikipedia, but the French author.[reply]

Did a search on the internet, here is the citation: Twenty-five great houses of France; the story of the noblest French chateaux, by Sir Theodore Andrea Cook ... with an introduction by W.H. Ward ... Author/Creator: Cook, Theodore Andrea, Sir, 1867-1928. Language: English Imprint: London, Offices of "Country Life" [etc.]; New York, C. Scribner's Sons [1905] Format: Book xl, 436 p. mounted front., illus. 40 cm. Contributor:Ward, William Henry, 1865-1924.

JMvanDijk (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think a separate column with all the shieldsat the same size (say 200px) would look best. But we need to find free ot fair use images of all the shields for I really to work. Otherwise it's just a largely empty column that doesn't really add anything. oknazevad (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think those would work; the site seems to be a replica seller, so those images are probably ones they took of their replicas, which would be copyrighted by them automatically. Not to mention the dodginess of such an enterprise in the first place; the designs are subject to various laws regarding counterfeits and impersonating officers, so we may just have to forgo the addition of shields (plus some of those sheilds are pure fiction, based on my research). oknazevad (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Habsburg may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

] *[[Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian II]], emperor 1564–1576 ]][[File:Armoiries empereur Ferdinand Ier.svg|50px]] *[[Joseph I, Holy Roman Emperor|Josef I]], emperor 1705–1711 ]][[File:Armoiries empereur Ferdinand Ier.svg|50px]] </br>VI </br>VII '''</center>||[[Kingdom of Dalmatia|King of Dalmatia]] <small>(the Hungarian part)]'')</small></br>[[Kingdom of Croatia (Habsburg)|Kingdom of Croatia]]</br>[[Kingdom of Slavonia]]</br>[[ The_Hapsburg_Monarchy_%28Henry_Wickham_Steed%29 ''The Hapsburg Monarchy'' (Wickham Steed, 1913)]) eLibrary Austria Project full text (ebook)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Habsburg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

] *[[Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian II]], emperor 1564–1576 ]][[File:Armoiries empereur Ferdinand Ier.svg|50px]] *[[Joseph I, Holy Roman Emperor|Josef I]], emperor 1705–1711 ]][[File:Armoiries empereur Ferdinand Ier.svg|50px]] </br>VI </br>VII '''</center>||[[Kingdom of Dalmatia|King of Dalmatia]] <small>(the Hungarian part)]'')</small></br>[[Kingdom of Croatia (Habsburg)|Kingdom of Croatia]]</br>[[Kingdom of Slavonia]]</ The_Hapsburg_Monarchy_%28Henry_Wickham_Steed%29 ''The Hapsburg Monarchy'' (Wickham Steed, 1913)]) eLibrary Austria Project full text (ebook)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Orange-Nassau may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

of Orange|William IV]], succeeded by his son [[William I of the Netherlands|King William I]] (-> [[#William I|Principality of the Netherlands (1813 - 1815)]] Prince of Orange|William IV of Orange-Nassau]], Hereditary Stadtholder of the United Netherlands (-> [[#Stadtholderate under the House of Orange-Nassau|Stadtholderate under the House of Orange-Nassau] {{familytree| |!| | | |)|-|-|v|CSII|!| | | | | | | | |,|-|-|-|-|-|^|.| | |!|CSII=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]<br />[ {{familytree| | | | |)|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|.|}} {{familytree| | | | | | |)|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|-|.| }} "princes and princesses of Orange-Nassau" and that the name of the house would be "Orange-Nassau" (in Dutch "Oranje-Nassau". Only those members of the members of the Dutch Royal Family that are * [[Pieter Geyl]], "Orange and Stuart 1641-1672" Phoenix Press, 2002>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Nassau may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (German: Dudo-Heinrich)]]'''<br/> (ca. 1060 – ca. 1123)<br/> was Count of Laurenburg in 1093]]<br/>[[File:Rangkronen-Fig. 18.svg|30px]]<br/>[[File:Wapen Nassauw.svg|40px]]|}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Nassau may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (German: Dudo-Heinrich)]]'''<br/> (ca. 1060 – ca. 1123)<br/> was Count of Laurenburg in 1093]]<br/>[[File:Rangkronen-Fig. 18.svg|30px]]<br/>[[File:Wapen Nassauw.svg|40px]]|}}
• {{familytree| | | |)|-|v|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|.| }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Nassau may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
{{familytree| | | |)|-|v|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|.| }} {{familytree| | |!| | | | | | |)|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|.| }} PH| | |AD| |JN2| |EN| |JN3|PH='''[[Philipp I, Count of Nassau-Weilburg|Philip I]]'''<br/>1368 +1429)<br/>Count of Nassau in Weilburg,Saarbrücken, etc.<br/>[[File:Rangkronen-Fig. 18.svg|30px]]<br/>[[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dutch Republic Lion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• inheritance to the [[House of Habsburg]] in 1482. Their descendants, the [[Kings of Spain]] (see [[Monarchy of Spain]] bear the title and arms of the county of Flanders to the day (see [[Coat

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of family trees may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[:File:Rodokmen Oldenburku.PNG|Oldenborg Dynasty Family Tree]](in Czech, shows relationships between branches of Oldenburg dynasty, i.e. the Kings of Denmark, the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Oldenburg may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Kings of Greece, and eventually Kings of Great Britian. There is a clickable version, in French, [[:fr:Maison d'Oldenbourg|here

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JMvanDiyk, how are you? I have re-reverted the addition of that genealogical tree on the House of Oldenburg article. The article discusses the agnatic descendants of the house (which solely constitute its members). If you would like to included that tree, can we edit out the Danish crown prince, his brother, and their children because they are not members of the house? Thank you! Seven Letters 19:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These are all of the descendants that are seen by the law of their land, common practice and tradition to be descendants of the house of Oldenburg and its cadet the house of Glucksborg (i.e. the Danish Crown Prince) and other cadets (i.e. the Romanovs, who no one in Russai calls Oldenburg, but the way). I am not interested in having a pedantic discussion on what is or is not in a theoretical world considered an 'agnatic' descedant. For example, if you ask a Dane on the street who is their royal house, they will (I don't have another more tactful way to put this)say the Huset Glucksborg, and if you mention Montpezant, they will likely give you a rude comment about "Henri" (my Danish mother-in-law's comment, but its pretty general there). There is minimal respect for him in Denmark. Similarly, if you ask a Brit who is their royal house, they will say "Windsor", and stare at you in the face blankly (again, apologies for being tactless)if you mention Philip's house of Oldenburg. Most are too young to remember him as Greek prince at all. They think of him as a "Mountbatten", i.e. Lord Louis' nephew. So, your point, while correct in theory, does not follow the law or customs of the lands where the Oldenburgs reign, and is really only important to a few scholars in the world. Having retired from a previous career as a scholar, I'm not interested in engaging in a pedantic discussion of 'agnastism'. If its really important to you not to have a chart that shows the genealogical relationships between a family whose main claim to fame is their genealogy, then so be it. Sorry to be blunt. I had this same argument with the house of Windsor folks, and it just gave me a headache and wasted my time.

Hi JMvanDijk, thank you for the family trees, e.g. the one of the Arryn, I suppose that the curly brackets "{}" mean "Lord" or "King", but I m not sure. What do you think about making the names bold instead? thats more clear in my view, isn't it? --W like wiki (talk) 02:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that is necessary, no problems. JMvanDijk (talk) 13:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of comparative military ranks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ***[[Uniforms and insignia of the Sturmabteilung]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a quick explanation. I wasn't trying to be pedantic about not including certain arms; there is a separate article for the House of Battenberg. The Mountbattens are Battenbergs who changed their surname following George V's 1917 order in council. Any Battenbergs who died or married before 1917 never became Mountbattens.

I think the inclusion of Louise, however, is correct and I missed her when I started the section. Sorry if there was any misunderstanding about my intentions. Sotakeit (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maurice, Prince of Orange may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Louis of Nassau, Lord of De Lek and Beverweerd]]) (1604 - 1665)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Neville, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Neville and Robert Neville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Beaufort

added links pointing to Edmund Tudor and Margaret Beaufort

House of Neville

added a link pointing to Richard Plantagenet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Red Rose of Lancaster into House of Lancaster. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read "Copyright violations", "Copying within Wikipedia" and the Plagiarism Guideline.

On 5 June 2017‎ you made a series of edits to the article House of York in which you copied text from other Wikipedia articles. In doing so you failed to attribute the source of the text as layout in "Copying within Wikipedia" and as such you were/are breach of copyright.

As is explained in "Copying within Wikipedia":

copying content from another page within Wikipedia requires supplementary attribution to indicate it. At minimum, this means providing an edit summary at the destination page – that is, the page into which the material is copied – stating that content was copied, together with a link to the source (copied-from) page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. Content reusers should also consider leaving notes at the talk pages of both source and destination.

How did I spot this? Well look at the references section of the version before you edited "Revision 03:56, 4 June 2017‎ by 186.220.106.58" and the references section after you had edited "Revision 17:45, 7 June 2017 by JMvanDijk". Before you edited all the inline citations were long ones. You addition added lots of short citations without a long citation to back them up. As "Copying within Wikipedia" notes in the section "Other reasons for attributing text"

If text with one or more short citations is copied from one or more parent articles into a child article, but the corresponding full reference in the parent's references section are not copied across, without appropriate attribution as specified below, it can be difficult to identify the full reference needed to support the short citations (see here for an example).

This is exactly the mess you have caused to be created in that article. I can identify (using a text search) at least one of the articles from which you copied text "List of coats of arms of the House of Plantagenet", and it looks as if there were others. To fix your copyright violation you need to edit the article "House of York" and add comments stating what you copied from where and when you did it. The simplest way to do this is to delete the copied sections and then add them back in stating where they originated.

The second thing you need to do is copy the missing long citations into a references/sources section so that the short citations are meaningful.

If you have carried out any other copies from one article to another and have not stated when and where you made the copies you need to go back to those articles and fix the copyright violation.

There is a whole team of people who dedicated a lot of time to fixing copyright violations and although copying within Wikipedia is quite a common mistake for unaware editors to make, if they have done it a lot and do not rectify their errors with appropriate retrospective attribution or they persist on making copies in the future then adminstrative action may be taken (see Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Repeated copyright violations).

-- PBS (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All I see wrong here is a broken link, so I'm struggling to see your point. I'm happy to fix that broken reference link. However, the references are in a short format but one that the citation page from Wikipedia says is acceptable. They refer to the books in the references section which have the complete bibliographical information. If you'd like to change them all to the long format, I have no objection to that. Similarly, the copied material as I see it and remember it was transcluded, as shown in the section, which is, as I understand it, from the transclusion page, a perfectly acceptable operation. If there is something cited wrong, again, I'm happy to have you edit it correctly. Much thanks. JMvanDijk ^talk

I am not sure how I can make it more explicit. Some of the text comes from pages that were copied and not transluded. Therefore you copied text from other Wikipedia pages, without appropriate attribution. If you do that again without appropriate attribution as described in "Copying within Wikipedia" your account may be blocked. I suggest that if this is still not clear that you ask at for clarification at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems -- PBS (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed all the short-inline citation problems you caused by not copying across the necessary long citations from the pages from which you copied and transluded text. There is however one exception which I could not fix as there is not enough information provided. As you created that short-citation please add the appropriate long citation to fix it. See talk:House of York#Text copied from other articles for details. -- PBS (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Checked, and it turns out it was just a repeated reference. So I removed it.JMvanDijk ^talk

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armorial of the House of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Achievement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armorial of the House of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beilstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed JMvanDijk (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armorial of the House of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liesveld (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed JMvanDijk (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Orange, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William III and Mondragon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get this. These all work. JMvanDijk (talk)

The article Sandbox17 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously, Sandbox of user accidentally in main space

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I moved the page of resources for your sandbox to draft. It's not a good long-term place for it since drafts are deleted after a few months, so you should move it somewhere else, like a user page. I leave it up to you to decide where best to put it for your use. But please don't put it in mainspace since it isn't an article. You'll find the page at Draft: Sandbox17. Thanks! Mcampany (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes, please let it be deleted. It was a typo from the lack of a "/". Thanks. JMvanDijk (talk)

Your sandbox User:JMvanDijk/Sandbox 9 is showing up in Lint errors: Multiple unclosed formatting tags because of (alleged) unclosed <small> tags. I do not understand why, but I have tracked the first two problems to this markup:

  vie=[[File:Dauphin of Viennois Arms.svg|35px]]<br /><small>[[List of counts of Albon and dauphins of Viennois#House of Burgundy|Viennois]]<br />[[1184]] – [[1273]]</small>|
  por=[[File:Armoiries Portugal 1180.svg|35px]]<br /><small>[[Portuguese House of Burgundy]]<br />[[1093]] – [[1409]]</small>|

Certainly, the small tags here appear to be closed, but the lint detector sees problems with both lines.

In Wikipedia, we don't usually wikilink years, so all of the year links should be stripped out.

Also <center>...</center> is now obsolete HTML, and you're encouraged to replace that with {{center|...}}. However, there is special centering markup for various special cases:

• galleries: <gallery class="center">
• tables: {| style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" (merge with other markup such as class="wikitable")
• table cells: style="text-align: center;" |

Finally, this markup ''The Rozels of Bedford" has unclosed italic markup.

I hope you can figure out what is wrong with the small tags, and I encourage you to replace the center tags.

—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Politics and government of the Dutch Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middelburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://heraldica.org/topics/france/frprince.htm, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure this is valid. The phrases on heraldic.org are a simple statement of fact showing descent of people. I'm not sure how would rephrase this. However, I will. JMvanDijk (talk) 13:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Flanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hainault.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page House of Wittelsbach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JMvanDijk

I saw your impressive Bath circlet among other elegant heraldic compositions - excellent work!

Since there doesn't yet seem to be an example of a CB's arms on Wikipedia, would you be so kind as to create an image of the arms of Major-General Sir David Egerton, Bt, CB?

These are blazoned:

Escutcheon: Argent a Lion rampant Gules between three Pheons Sable in centre chief an Inescutcheon Argent charged of a Sinister Hand erect epaumée couped Gules (Canton of a Baronet)

Crest: Three Arrows two in saltire Argent and one in pale point downwards Or barbed and feathered Sable banded with a Ribbon Gules

Helm: That of a Knight

Mantling: Argent and Gules

Orders: The Shield is surrounded by the Bath circlet, inscribed with its Motto:
TRIA JUNCTA IN UNO

Motto: Virtuti Non Armis Fido.

The following are elements of Sir David Egerton's arms which, should you be agreeable to assist in this way, I trust you may find of help:

• 
  Egerton arms
• 
  Baronet's canton
• 
  Egerton arms, showing composition, although not exactly same as Egerton baronets' arms
• 
  Egerton arms, depicting the baronets' crest (Sir Thomas Egerton, 7th Bt, was cr. Earl of Wilton)
• 
  Example of arrows in crest, but the points would be downwards
• 
  Example of relevant helm and mantling
• 
  Order of the Bath circlet

I hope this appeals to you - looking forward to hearing - many thanks.

Best Primm1234 (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at William III of England shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Flags of the World: fotw.info cannot be used as a citation on wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nerva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

I removed your contribution because it wasn't sourced, repeated information already in the article and wasn't properly formatted according to policy. You need to provide reliable sources for all your text and images. Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Also note that this article is already very long and there has been extensive discussion on the talk page about cutting it back. So you will need to gain consensus for adding new material.

Happy to discuss on the Talk page of the article. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I cut most of your text because it repeats information already in the article and the citations were incomplete. The image of the arms is also far too big and intrusive. Why don't you just put a small images of the arms, with a suitable caption, somewhere in the section on the empire? You will also need to put the citations regarding the arms somewhere where the references can be clicked on and checked. By the way, didn't Napoleon also use the bee as his symbol and incorporated this motif into his imperial imagery? Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. You need a page number for the citation. Thanks. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 12:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The bee was a decorative motif found on furnature, clothing, mantles and jewelry (see the sources). But, these were the official arms.JMvanDijk (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capetian House of Anjou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited States of Holland and West Friesland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gouda and Edam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]