User talk:Dmvward

Hello, Dmvward, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bencherlite^Talk 21:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

— Rod ^talk 18:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anglo-Bavarian Brewery, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 06:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dmvward, please see the tag I have placed on the above-captioned page and the note on the related talk page. Bongomatic (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in. Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Request handled by: [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 18:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am just wondering, how is this not encyclopedic? Would a listing of past meetings be appropriate? Bearian (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In two or three ways, I would suggest: (1) it said "The next meeting ... is taking place March 13-18, 2009" - given that it was written on 11 March, it was almost immediately going to become out of date. (2) Ref WP:NOTCRYSTAL, "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred" - would the meeting be notable in its own right? (3) The article was about Houses of Bishops in general. It might be more relevant in an article about the American House of Bishops (ie in General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America), in the same way that the aricle on the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada includes both past venues and the date of the next one. Dmvward (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Bearian (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On May 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Byelaws in the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On June 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Local and Personal Acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 02:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this excellent article - I just saw it on the mainpage :). Do you have a personal interest in English/UK law? There are a couple of articles I'd like to get to a high quality that I'd appreciate another set of eyes on. Ironholds (talk) 07:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did a law degree (quite a few years ago, now) and still retain an interest. Happy to look at your articles (please signpost), though I make no guarantees that I can improve them! Dmvward (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On September 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charterhouse Cave, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 07:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

On October 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Military Courts of the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Interesting stuff! Bencherlite^Talk 21:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On January 30, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Offences against Military Law in the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to Frome, Somerset & related pages. They have improved the articles (& dealt with some of my poor prose). Would you be interested in looking at Midsomer Norton which has also been nominated for GA? Are there any of the others described at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somerset#? Collaboration - towns to get to GA which you might be interested in working on? I have a vague personal aim about getting these to GA this year.— Rod ^talk 18:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your work on Shepton Mallet & congratulations on getting your first GA.— Rod ^talk 20:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On May 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Election court, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is really too much to be able to fit it in the Emergency vehicle lighting article - plus the content from Blues and twos relates to sirens as well. Can I suggest that you try to work some of your excellent additions to the explanations in Emergency_vehicle_lighting#United_Kingdom into Blues and twos? I would do it myself but seeing as you put the work into it I don't want to go and mess up the structure. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 17:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, but the detail that's needed to go into an adequate explanation justifies it being in a separate article - maybe move Blues and twos to Emergency vehicle equipment in the United Kingdom? Then it could include the equipment carried as well, which would pad it out a bit. Possibly even Emergency vehicles in the United Kingdom? Either way, Emergency_vehicle_lighting#United_Kingdom could be reduced to a summary, with a {{main}} link to wherever the content is. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Stoke Lane Slocker entrance.jpg.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On July 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Friendly Society Brasses, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

On 21 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Independent custody visitor, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that independent custody visitors must be immediately admitted to a police station in the United Kingdom so that they can speak to people being detained and ensure that they are being properly treated? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of First-tier Tribunal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I okay'ed your hook for First-tier Tribunal. Now, since Upper Tribunal is also a new article, could you suggest a hook for that in a separate nomination right after First-tier Tribunal, and I'll okay that, too? Yoninah (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article First-tier Tribunal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the First-tier Tribunal in the United Kingdom hears cases on such diverse subjects as freedom of information, war pensions and operating licences for gambling companies? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Upper Tribunal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Upper Tribunal, which can set precedent and enforce its decisions without intervention from the High Court of England and Wales, is the first UK tribunal with the power of judicial review? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Investigatory Powers Tribunal is the only British judicial body that can investigate whether surveillance carried out by MI5 or MI6 is legal? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Courts of Jersey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Samedi division of the Royal Court, one of the Courts of Jersey, sits on a Friday, rather than a Saturday as the name suggests? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I note that {{Jersey}} has been created. Not sure where Windmills in the Channel Islands would fit in. Any ideas? Mjroots (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it under Historic Sites. Thanks for mentioning this page. DavidWard ^talk 12:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Looks like you are doing some good work on heritage/listed buildings at risk particularly Mendip - Thanks. Just a quick thought: you have added the cats Category:Grade II listed buildings in Somerset, Category:Listed buildings at risk in Somerset etc to village articles eg Holcombe, Somerset & Witham Friary. I have been advised in the past not to add building specific cats to village articles & only add them when the article is about the specific building. What do you think?— Rod ^talk 14:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rod. I wasn't sure about that. I noticed that Orchardleigh Estate had Grade II and Grade II* categories attached, although in fact the article covers several buildings (incl a Grade I church), so I sort-of assumed that it was Ok by extension. The difficulty (especially for the Grade IIs and the neglected buildings, such as those on at-risk registers) is whether the buildings are sufficiently notable in their own right to justify a whole new page. I think you've been creating new articles for lots of churches and other things, so would you recommend creating new pages for these buildings? Thanks. DavidWard ^talk 17:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, The accepted norm seems to be Grade I & Grade II* are inherently notable and worth their own article. Grade IIs are if there are enough reliable sources to write a decent article & each is judged on its won merits. Most of the churches I've done have been I or II* with others in the care of the Churches Conservation Trust which tend to have reports about them which can be used as sources. If you need any help let me know.— Rod ^talk 18:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Pitt (local government officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability, as indicated by single reference the supports none of the substantive content of the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exok (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the work you've been doing on Jersey law and legal system. I'm hoping to contribute fairly regularly on this subject too. Best wishes, Andrew Andrew Le Sueur (talk) 11:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frome Times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frome Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Rod ^talk 12:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H, Thanks for wikilinking Conservators on Bridgwater and Taunton Canal, but does it need to be wikilinked 8 times in the same article?— Rod ^talk 12:58, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol and Exeter Railway is wikilinked multiple times ... DavidWard ^talk 13:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That one shouldn't be either. My rule of thumb is once in the lead & then once the first time it occurs in the main body of the article - see WP:OVERLINK which says once (with exceptions for infoboxes, captions etc.— Rod ^talk 13:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A bot has visited Friendly Society Brasses and marked lots of the citations as dead external links to the Philip Hoyland site. I've looked but I can't find any archive versions - I was wondering if you had any alternatives which could be used for these facts?— Rod ^talk 20:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]