User talk:Bongomatic

• Conversations though 25 September 2008.
• Conversations through 11 November 2008.
• Conversations through late December 2008.
• Conversations through mid-February 2009.
• Conversations through 30 April 2009.
• Conversations through 9 October 2009.
• Conversations through 31 December 2009.
• Conversations through 23 May 2011.
• Conversations through 25 October 2012.

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt my talk page is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability. 4 years later, it's unresolved. You may want to take it to WP:N/N or AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note—sadly not very involved in the encyclopedia at the moment so not really embarking on anything that requires interaction. Cheers! ^Bongo_matic 08:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bongo--real life keeping you occupied? I hope things are going well for you. If you have a moment, look at that AfD and tell me if that doesn't sound familiar one way or another. Happy days, and see you around, Drmies (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc, yes--occupied enough. Hope all is well with you. If your e-mail address is the same you'll see I sent a multi-book review that mentions this. There's also this, but the journal may not be sufficient to confer notability. Other than those, I only found blog reviews, etc. I don't really have an opinion, but looks like a consensus is building. Certainly the article is inadequately sourced at a minimum. ^Bongo_matic 03:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And, ah, yes . . . same general region if recollection is not wrong. This has a better chance, I'd say, though four years after release it's not obvious that lots of new editorial reviews will be rolling in. ^Bongo_matic 03:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got the review--thanks. Well spotted: I didn't find anything like that. Drmies (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what got under your skin to make you come through and slam the Tom Steyer talk page like you did, but you need to take that attitude and put it somewhere besides Wikipedia.

Contributions like this one add nothing to the discussion. Jsharpminor (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your opinion. I will take this view into consideration in my future Wikipedia activities. ^Bongo_matic 02:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsharpminor (talk • contribs) 02:04, 9 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

You say here, "I reviewed the guidelines for providing a third opinion and oddly, there is no suggestion that third opinions make reference to Wikipedia policies and guidelines—but that's probably because it was assumed by the authors (and most readers)." Actually, the original concept is that a 3O is about the quickest and lightest opinion that one can give. One particularly wise Third Opinion Wikipedian, RegentsPark, once succinctly put the purpose of Third Opinions like this, "It's sort of like if you're having an argument on the street in front of City Hall and turn to a passer-by to ask 'hey, is it true that the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale?'." It's left up to each 3O'er to decide how much further beyond that level, if any, that they want to go. Some just say, "I agree with editor X" while others enter into what amounts to a full-blown informal mediation. Most of us plop down about halfway between those extremes and try to give a well-reasoned and well-documented analysis, but the forum allows a good deal of latitude. That's especially true since 3O's carry no authority or weight and arguably do not even "count" towards consensus, but are merely intended to be just that, a third opinion which the disputants are entirely free to accept or reject. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note--useful background for me as I don't recall ever having been involved with an article that was the subject of a 3O. Thanks for stopping by!. ^Bongo_matic 16:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether if Stu Klitenic should be deleted or not. The conversation will be held at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Klitenic until a consensus is held and everyone is welcome to join the conversation. However, do not remove the AfD message on the top of the page. Ashbeckjonathan 04:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The article Boris Yavitz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy New Year !!!
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

It's been too long old friend, how's the skiing this year? kelapstick(bainuu) 01:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note! Snow was sub-optimal but nonetheless a great time was had by all. Older kids started doing boarding as well as skiing. How about you? ^Bongo_matic 09:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear, you should have been out our way, notwithstanding the lack of mountains, the snow was monumental, we are just losing the last of it. I am still bumming around Canada for the foreseeable future, waiting for things in Mongolia to pick up. There has been some good news as of late, but nothing definitive. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I was trying to find you the most colorful barnstar I could--nice to see you again, Bongomatic. DYK that old Kelapstick finally got a job? He's doing PI work for ArbCom, on a case by case basis. He tells me it's boring but the pay is awesome. Hope you're doing well. Stick around--the project needs you. Drmies (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind, very kind. I am heartened that you remember me at all, Doc. My editing now is likely to remain limited to drive-bys--"see something, say something". But once I log in I usually check out the most recent threads on your talk page, too. Hope life as a (pretty long, now) tenured loafer is doing you well. ^Bongo_matic 13:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, is Bongo back? Glad to see you backish. First round is on me. I will just put it on my committee expense account, under "team building" or some bullshit like that. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Back" would certainly be an exaggeration. How's tricks? Where are you workin' these days? ^Bongo_matic 01:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone is good, hanging my hat most of the time in Indonesia these days. Not a bad spot I guess. Hey, you remember that time that I wrote Batu Hijau mine, and it was chock full of copyright violations which (partially) tanked my first RfA, and got deleted by MRG, but then you restarted it, and convinced me to rewrite it again? Thanks for that (also that's not where I am). --kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do remember that. Important mine. What island are you on and what kind of mine? ^Bongo_matic 05:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bongomatic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bongomatic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bongomatic! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit. ^Bongo_matic 23:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bongomatic,

I have granted you a temporary three month IP block exemption per your request. Hopefully, you will be able to edit now without disruption. Before it expires, we can reevaluate if it is still necessary and issue an extension if so. You may want to ping me or another checkuser a few days ahead of time.

Good to see you around again,
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Berean Hunter: Thanks for that. I'll try to remember! ^Bongo_matic 23:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back (says the guy who's never here). Was glad to see your name pop back up. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Berean Hunter: Hi there. I guess the IP block exemption has expired. Would you be comfortable extending it? I'm not editing a lot, but have a few odds and ends to contribute. Thanks, ^Bongo_matic 07:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bongo, I've given you a one year IPBE this time so you shouldn't have any problems.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 10:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Berean Hunter: Muchas gracias. ^Bongo_matic 10:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Berean Hunter: Sure as the calendar page flips over, the one year IPBE expired. Would be terrific if you could do the necessary for whatever period is appropriate. Gong xi fa cai! ^Bongo_matic 12:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for another year. Gong xi fa cai!
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Drmies: Hi Doc, hope you're doing well. My CU (per above) expired I see Berean is no longer active (or a CU). I sent an email request for extension to CU, but was denied without reason. If, without violating policy, you could re-up me or let me know why this is denied, that would be great. I continue to use VPN at all times where possible. Thanks! ^Bongo_matic 00:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Barkeep49, I must admit I really don't know anything about this stuff. Can you help a Bongo out? I can vouch for them--this was an excellent edit, for instance, it's all thanks to Bongo that we know about Kentucky jam cake. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Bongo, I'm a bit sad. If you look at this edit, and you go back a bit, you'll see me editing this article the year before. You could have let me know that Karn had died--it took me ten years to learn that. :-( Drmies (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Bongomatic, sorry you're having trouble editing here. For other CU reference, the ticket is ticket:2021020610003791. Given that this was sent to OTRS, I'm not able to discuss it on-wiki without your consent, but I'll email you shortly with an explanation. You are of course free to publish the contents of my email on-wiki on Wikipedia if you wish to do so. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 03:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bongomatic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature is causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links lint errors, and also uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<small>[[User talk:Bongomatic|<sup style="color:green;">Bongo</sup>]]</small><small>[[Special:Contributions/Bongomatic|<sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex; color:blue;">matic</sub>]]</small> : ^Bongo_matic

to

<sup>[[User talk:Bongomatic|<small style="color:green">Bongo</small>]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Bongomatic|<small style="color:blue">matic</small>]]</sub> : ^Bongo_matic

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:58, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:James Fu Bin Lu, from its old location at User:Bongomatic/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sulfurboy: Thanks but I'm not submitting this for creation. I'll leave it in my namespace for now--it has only been a few days and will delete or submit. ^Bongo_matic 07:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AlanScott.jpg, which you've attributed to Lila Scott. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AlanScottCrop.jpg, which you've attributed to Lila Scott. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Logan: Thank you for the note. I have sent the original permission from the author to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. ^Bongo_matic 12:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Leech (restaurateur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DrmiesHey doc, could you restore this to my User space so I can have a look? Don't recall the article at all, but my habit was not generally to create bios that fail the notability guidelines. ^Bongo_matic 08:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alber Elbaz, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bongomatic! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Double v and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 5#Double v until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otto Spoerri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Spoerri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 16:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]