Talk:Victoria Leigh Soto

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victoria Leigh Soto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This page was nominated to be merged on February 15, 2013. The result of the discussion was Keep as is.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: keep, December 7, 2024, see discussion. no consensus, December 22, 2012 (UTC), see discussion.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Puerto Rico Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Connecticut Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

This is the fake picture of Vicki Soto from Time Magazine cover. Her body is poorly photoshop-ed on a pair of legs. The position of the body and legs is impossible.

I've tried to rectify the breathtaking one-sidedness of this article by including a reliable and relevant quote in the Funeral Section; comments made by a family friend during a speak at the funeral. It says: "At the funeral, family friend Peter Rusatsky said of Victoria's actions: "any teacher would do it and not blink and just do whatever had to be done to protect those children"." and is fully sourced.

A few people have claimed this to be a POV and so not allowed it the article. I disagree, but if that is the case then shouldn't we remove the following similar points that are throughout the article:

• Saying she's been "hailed as a hero".
• Saying a photograph of her sister waiting for news "has been described as "iconic."". (Only ONE source describes this as iconic- Fox News Latino). How is this more relevant than my source-The Daily Mirror.

87.232.1.48 (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She is notable because of her heroism, so I don't see that emphasis as being "one-sided." I don't see any problem with the quote, except that I don't see why that is being pulled out or what the point is. It's not an especially notable quote and the person making the quote does not appear to be notable. On balance my vote is "meh." Coretheapple (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Neither the comment nor the commenter are notable. Of course a relative or family friend would think of her as a hero. It's simply unencyclopedic. WWGB (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the word "hero" is more commonly used to refer to individuals of either gender. Although still in usage "heroine" sounds dated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.40.244 (talk) 19:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowing pages for photoshop creations now? Do we really need the Government confirmation before we take down this page? 69.251.63.224 (talk) 19:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Photoshop creations??--Auric talk 23:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This subject was already discussed and a consensus reached. It was decided that that the subject was notable in her own merits and therefore not to be merged with any other article. See Talk:Victoria Leigh Soto/Archive 1 . Tony the Marine (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]