Talk:Paritala Ravindra

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. India: Andhra Pradesh / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in March 2012.

--Vyzasatya 16:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No comments

By mentioning Naxals never killed women and children this article is trying to make them heroes which is not so. Kakatiya passanger incident, killing innocent people is an example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.207.10 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 28 January 2006‎

The article talks about the naxal activities in Anantapur district during the eighties and not about the activities in other districts or their recent activities. For that matter naxals killed a mad person very recently in Anantapur district. I reiterate naxals never killed women and children in the incidents mentioned in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.95.130 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 5 February 2006‎

"Verifiability" Rule No 5 Of wipikedia was not satisfied regarding alegations on Obul Reddy So Deleted the part where it mentioned abt Obul Reddy. If you are going to revert Please cite a reputable source for this information. Please maintain Nutrality and Stick to facts. Do not write any opinions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.42.229 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 February 2006‎

These are not any opinions but these are facts. Refer to eenadu (dated 25-1-05, 2-2-05 - ananatapur district edition, 6-2-05 - sunday special) for compact and concise version of the killings which took place between 1989-94. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.95.130 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 9 February 2006‎

I am not disputing the Facts that they were killed I am disputing the fact the no one was Found guilty and the details you mentioned. Can you also provide the link to the so called Anantapur edition of EENADU paper( EENADU paper is not a reputable source but that is not under discussion here) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.42.229 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 9 February 2006‎

It seems it has become a fashion to criticize EENADU like news papers. I have been a vivid reader of many news papers including Andhra Prabha (no more), Andhra Jyothi (rennovated), Vaartha, Andhra Bhoomi / DC etc. Comparing the facts and extremity of the biasedness, I found EENADU is the best of all. This my opinion with neutral stance. I found that DC and Vaartha have been very biased where as Andhra Jyothi used to be really good but now-a-days seems more on DC style. I think most of this stems from the readers with preconceived notions from cast angle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.35.242 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 27 May 2006‎

Fact: Eenadu and Andhra Jyothi are the most biased of all the newspapers. If you have been reading it for atleast a few years you would of noticed by now they write articles in a way that favors TDP and anyone linked to TDP. Anyone who goes against the party will be strongly criticized even if what the party is doing wrong and this person went against it. Putting that aside Partala Ravi is a cold blooded criminal. He is the man behind the murder of Vangaveti Ranga along with several other cases. He is so bad that the day he was killed, majority of A.P. thought good riddance to him. Some even considered his killer a hero. He is the reason why Maddelacheruvu Suri became a goonda with the intent of killing him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.218.177 (talk) 00:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Please do not say EENADU is neutral. It is completely biased towards TDP, so is Andhra jyothi. Only Hindu paper is neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.239.45.4 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 17 February 2011‎

Paritala Ravindra is the Official name. not Paritala ravindra chowdhary. If some wants to mention his caste please do so in a separate line — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.176.0.194 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 June 2006‎

There I see, where did a poor Paritala Ravindra get money to supply grains to nine adjoining villages? Where did he get money to lay roads and build community halls? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.118.38.2 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 4 July 2006‎

Is sunitha paritala ravi's cousin? How did he marry a sister being a hindu? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.6.54 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 18 July 2006‎

Vyzasatya -- First learn english -- There is no need Cousin to be sister allways -- he married daughter of maternal uncle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.79.247 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 19 August 2006‎

Paritala ravindra Birthday on 30th Augest not on 8th Augest — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.100.54 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 25 January 2008‎

This section needs to be removed, there is no context for including it. This information if supported by references can be included in the text. Rajkancherla (talk) 05:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paritala Ravindra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120706131319/http://www.frontlineonnet.com:80/fl2204/stories/20050225004803100.htm to http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2204/stories/20050225004803100.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302145829/http://www.deccanchronicle.com:80/national/maddelacheruvu-suri-succumbs-attack-wounds-078 to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/national/maddelacheruvu-suri-succumbs-attack-wounds-078

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]