Talk:Jurat

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Jersey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jersey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jersey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject JerseyTemplate:WikiProject JerseyJersey Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Channel Islands Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Channel Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Channel Islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Channel IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Channel IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Channel IslandsChannel Islands-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I wonder if the list of Jersey Jurats could be moved to the new page 'Judiciary of Jersey (list)', and expanded to include past Jurats of Jersey?Andrew Le Sueur (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree; list of current Jurats moved. DavidWard ^talk 10:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jurat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926183329/http://www.jerseylaw.je/Law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce%2fconsolidated%2f11%2f11.450_LicensingLaw1974_RevisedEdition_1January2011.htm to http://www.jerseylaw.je/law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce%2Fconsolidated%2F11%2F11.450_LicensingLaw1974_RevisedEdition_1January2011.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003101848/http://www.jerseylaw.je/law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce%2Fconsolidated%2F16%2F16.600_PublicElections%28Jersey%29Law2002_RevisedEdition_1January2009.htm to http://www.jerseylaw.je/law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce%2fconsolidated%2f16%2f16.600_PublicElections%28Jersey%29Law2002_RevisedEdition_1January2009.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080604013549/http://www.alderney.gov.gg/index.php/pid/51/view/109 to http://www.alderney.gov.gg/index.php/pid/51/view/109

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article namespace "jurat" point to the article on office holders in the Channel Islands, or should it point to the article on the common legal document which forms part of an affidavit? A loose necktie (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Several years ago this article was changed from the latter to the former with no discussion (that I could find). It does seem that a large number of internal Wikipedia links are aimed at the article about the office holders in Jersey and Guernsey, but this appears to be a rather obscure meaning of the term "jurat" and even a very brief search of sources for "jurat" finds overwhelming reference to the legal document, not the British office holders. If we want our readers to be able to type "jurat" into a Wikipedia search box and have their intended subject appear, then it looks to me like "jurat" needs to be adjusted to meet this (I do not think that the preponderance of internal Wikipedia links has bearing on the public's expectations for search terms, but maybe I am wrong on this). What do others think? A loose necktie (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]