Talk:Callista Gingrich

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Callista Gingrich article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance). Virginia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wisconsin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Joedesantis (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: Kaczynski, Andrew (February 2, 2012). "Newt Gingrich's Communications Director Polished Callista's Wikipedia Page 23 Times". BuzzFeed. Retrieved February 3, 2012. Dowd, Maureen (February 5, 2012). "The Great Man's Wife". The New York Times. Retrieved February 5, 2012. Wallace, Gregory (February 6, 2012). "Gingrich spokesman defends Wikipedia edits". CNN.com. Retrieved February 6, 2012. Ralph, Talia (February 6, 2012). "Joe DeSantis, Newt Gingrich's communications director, made over 60 changes to the GOP candidate's Wikipedia page". GlobalPost. Retrieved February 6, 2012. Levy, Rachael (February 6, 2012). "Gingrich Camp Criticized for Editing Wikipedia Pages". Slate. Retrieved February 6, 2012.

This article was nominated for merging with Newt Gingrich on January 20, 2012. The result of the discussion was Keep articles separate.

The inclusion of “third wife” and “mistress” has been debated on this page in the past. It is a fact primarily about her husband, not her, and belongs on Newt’s page. It’s too much detail in the lead and is in any event mentioned below in the article, in the personal life section. Cindy McCain isn’t introduced as “the second wife of John McCain.” “Married” is a neutral way of describing the relationship that is appropriate for the lead.

Please look back through the Talk history before changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpworth (talk • contribs) 03:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a person who contributed to the discussion, there was no strong consensus but in the end, what is she known for. Nobody cares that she runs a production company (occasionally) or that she sang in a choir when she was a teenager. What she's know for is being the mistress of Gingrich while he was castigating Clinton for his infidelities. There were efforts by Joe Desantis to scrub this article of any mention of her history there, but this is where we ended up and the article was stable for months before you came back. Mattnad (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She is known, in large part, for being the wife of Newt Gingrich. Your partisan (and factually incorrect – Clinton was impeached for perjury, not for an extramarital affair, and a review of the totality of Gingrich’s comments on the matter will reveal he focused on the perjury) description is a dead giveaway that you have a hostile view of the subject and are not trying to achieve article neutrality, but instead paint the subject in a negative light. --Rpworth 19:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpworth (talk • contribs)

Simply googling "Calista Gingrich", you find MANY articles, new and old, that address her "third wife" status and the controversy around that. This was an issue on the campaign trail and has been an issue for her her and her husband in the public sphere. Everything that's in there is supported by reliable sources.Mattnad (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree with Mattnad on this. Tvoz/talk 20:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.gingrichproductions.com/2008/11/about-us/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic content has again been removed and the article semi-protected to prevent its restoration. Please ensure that all content placed in the article is written in your own words, unless drawn from compatibly licensed or public domain sources. The sources that have been copied and closely paraphrased here are fully reserved. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Callista Gingrich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303224922/http://m.jsonline.com/topstories/142273235.htm to http://m.jsonline.com/topstories/142273235.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have been cleaning up this article with edits that are pretty minor (mostly organization and tense changes) but I want to flag the edit I just made to the Ambassador section of Career. The previous version of this section was entirely based on one negative article about her husband and did not cover what Gingrich actually did while in the role of Ambassador to the Holy See. I replaced the section with new text citing multiple sources in what I believe is a neutral tone. However, I am flagging this for help because I am not a neutral party and am seeking a neutral editor to look at this. Joedesantis1 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joedesantis1, hello, this is not the proper venue to do this. Please use {{request edit}} to do so. Heart ^(talk) 04:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or you can use request for comment. Thanks, Heart ^(talk) 04:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HeartGlow30797: I think you misunderstood this. Joedesantis1 has already made the edit and is asking someone to review it. Kleinpecan (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kleinpecan, oh sorry, yes I misread this. Thanks for pointing this out! Heart ^(talk) 04:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kleinpecan, HeartGlow30797, Thank you both. I will keep those tags in mind for the future. Joedesantis1 (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any relationship with Bunga bunga during her stay as the ambassator in Rome? 89.245.24.233 (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]