Wikipedia:Editor review/FishingKing

FishingKing (talk · contribs · count) STATEMENT FishingKing, fighting to keep Wikipedia factual. (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   "My main contributions to wikipedia is inviting IP addresses to become members of Wikipedia. I also do daily anti-vandalism sweeps mainly on IP only edits and distribute warnings were necessary. I also sometimes patrol new pages. I am particularly proud of my anti-vandalism work and the barnstars that I earn for it.

3. Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.

   Certain IP addresses and users which persistently vandalise really annoy me. Although I did contribute in some edit wars and badly judged warnings and blocking requests when I first started out a few months back. I have now learnt to deal calmly with these people as most of the time they don't really know who to use wiki and don't know the 5 pillars. The rule to anti-vandalism success is to "Keep calm and carry on"! I have dealt with it in the past badly, getting annoyed but I was an amateur then! In the recent past and the future I will/have deal/dealt with vandalism in a responsible and calm manor rather than staging full out war

Reviews

Comments

• Could you answer the second part of question two? Cheers, Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 02:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• User indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry; there is no need to contribute to this review. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]