User talk:Xoloz

This user may have left Wikipedia. Xoloz has not edited Wikipedia since July 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is my talk page. Like most Wikipedians, I reserve the right to refactor it for archival reasons. Please do not mark any message addition as "minor"; if you do, I won't know that you've written. Please do write: I'm lonely. Xoloz

My talk archives are here: archive1, archive2, archive3, archive4, archive5, archive6, archive7, archive8, archive9, archive10, archive11, archive12, archive13, archive14, archive15, archive16, archive17, archive18, archive19, archive20, archive21, archive 22 (retirement), and archive 23

Hi there! You were both generous with your time, and helpful years ago when I asked for you help and advice. I ask you for your help, as the Nikki Phoenix article has been places up many months ago by other editors, has passed review as meeting Notability under WP:PORNBIO which it does in many areas, and has been subsequently vandalized, and then nominated for deletion by the same editor. Numerous editors have come to it's defense, clearly citing Notability across a broad spectrum, and I would ask you to goto the deletion deiscussion page, read the history check the links for yourself to see that she in fact overqualifies in 2 (not just 1) areas for Notability under WP:PORNBIO and please cast a Vote to KEEP the article so that it can continue to be worked on and grow, and so that it will not be come and example of how to Vandalize and the be able to Delete a page that many editors worked hard on. Any help you can lend would be greatly appreciated!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nikki_Phoenix_(2nd_nomination)

Best, Art javier (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Xoloz, I have followed your advices to improve SourceLair according to Wikipedia's philosophy. I don't know if I should change anything else or it is alright now and it just have to be reviewed by someone. Can you let me know? Thank you a lot, in advance. 1xristos2 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have created new content for the Bank of Utah page in my sandbox. Will you please review and move it to the correct spot (and under the correct capitalization of Bank of Utah)? Bruce2605 (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you had a chance to review the new content in my sandbox for the Bank of Utah page? Bruce2605 (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my sandbox for the creation of the Bank of Utah article. Bruce2605 (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad it got deleted. If it can be restored somehow I will put in the references and add some more detail. Rleir (talk) 14:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One last question on Untitled Zelda Project. Is there any other alternative to make the history visible? Like for example a history merge with Legend of Zelda Project (2010)?

Oh and the early history of Donkey Kong Country Returns seems to be spread across Donkey Kong (Wii) & Donkey Kong Bongo Blast. Here [1] [2] and Here [3] [4]. SNS (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, thank you for putting that discussion to bed. It was past time for the next step. I'll wait a while and let another user start the move review, but I wanted your opinion on a point I plan on stressing in the move review (and that nobody touched on in the discussion). Namely, WP:NATURALDIS mentions that in the presence of two common names, the one without a need for parenthetical disambiguation will be preferred (i.e. "White Album"). How suitable will that point be to the move review? Dralwik|^{Have a Chat} 21:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I realize move review probably isn't going to change this outcome, and there isn't anything amiss with your specific closure, but I am hopeful that the heightened emphasis on policy will permit a clearer reaction to the policies in my argument without the noise over what "the proper name" would be, and give me an idea of how WP:NATURALDIS is received by the other side. My vote would likely be "overturn to relist via policy-based rationale," spelling out the relative lack of discussion on the policy merits of my idea. Dralwik|^{Have a Chat} 02:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine that I'll have the move review set within a day's time, hopefully soon. Letting you know. Red Slash 06:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of The Beatles (album). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. - I don't mean to disrespect you and I apologize to you if it was in any way disparaging to you on a personal level. I just think the close was not in the least bit in line with how we close move requests and how we're supposed to judge consensus here at Wikipedia. Red Slash 08:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have revised it, and I have added the awards. My regards.

Could I get you to re-delete Suelong Sae Ma, an article you deleted per WP:BLPPROD yesterday? Less than twelve hours after deletion, someone recreated an identical, still unsourced version of the article. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will make an inquiry to the new creator, and allow him time to source the article, as a gesture of kindness to a newbie. If the creator doesn't respond in a reasonable time, I will re-delete. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What would you require to have this page re-instated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.50.110 (talk) 21:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Also can you please send or direct me to a copy of the last copy of the page prior to deletion so I have something to work with.[reply]

I wish to contact editor Xoloz . I need assistance with an article. I cannot figure out how to contact this editor. Any help would be appriciated User: 66phil This is in reference to a deleted article, aparently by your approval? It is difficult to understand what ay have been the reasoning as there were so many regstered references and cross reference in additon to being authored by myself, one of the founding members. I would like to relist it and I need to make sure I understand more completely the permeters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66phil (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you undelete the picture from the The Legend of Zelda (2015 video game)?

Commons:File:Zelda2015 Screenshot of Nintendo Digital Event.jpg

SNS (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I can't undelete that for you. I'm not an admin on Commons. Try contacting the admin who deleted it there. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could re-delete this article again, and possibly salt it this time. It's been recreated a second time. As before, the article is identical (or almost) to previous versions and remains unsourced. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for missing this while I was on vacation. It seems another admin took care of it. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 18:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you to do me a favor as a 3rdparty/admin/someone-who-supported please close the 3 RMs as "withdrawn by proposer"; with blatant canvass and the Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton factor there's no value to the community in prolonging this. Would you mind? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then maybe I should reconsider. Thanks for that perspective. By HRC factor I evidently mean this, yet again, if it isn't obvious. After such a heavy canvass in recent edits the well is poisoned whatever the result. But I suppose it can take it's course and some other poor admin will wrap it up when it clogs the backlog. No big issue either way, it's of minimal utility compared to creating content. Thanks again, appreciated it. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Leon Jeronimo Radziwiłł, just like you had deleted the main page. Thanks OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As before, the article is identical and still unsourced. Could you please delete it, and salt it this time so it doesn't get recreated again? Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you undelete the history of Aquapod [5] & Talk:Aquapod (bottle)? SNS (talk) 04:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xoloz, I would kindly ask you to explain why you deleted the article about Daniel Dombrowe. There is no such thing as the promotion of himself as an entrepreneur nor as himself as the DJ. The main focus of this article lies on Mr Dombrowes efforts regarding the Baltic Soul Charity. A charity founded to support artists who have been betrayed by their management. This is an importand topic to Mr Dombrowe, to the artists and of course to a lot of people and Wikipedia Users. I would like to ask you for advice on how this article can be written to avoid any thoughts of promotion and on how it is possible to introduce Mr Dombrowe as a really important person in music business. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kradow soul01 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Xoloz, I'm here, referred from a websearch of "xpadder" an article you removed. My question is, if many other articles about small free softwares are allowed, like SumatraPDF, why disallow this one?Semitones (talk) 14:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xoloz. A while back you opposed my nomination for speedy deletion of the page Keith Loris. CCing @Ronz:, who was subsequently involved in wikifying that page. I have only nominated one or two pages for deletion, so could I call on you two for an opinion on whether Akiko Yuge merits a place in an encyclopaedia? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As sourced, I think it is at high risk for deletion. With only those sources, the article seems undue with that amount of content. --Ronz (talk) 22:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ronz, much appreciated. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xoloz, hope things are well with you, I wanted to touch bases with you, and ask you if you could please check the article you moved into my sandbox regarding singer/writer/actress Nikki Phoenix, I refocused the article on her mainstream endeavors as you suggested to avoid the stygma of the adult business associations, as she now has an Album as well as songs out (available on iTunes, Amazon Etc.) and a book as well as numerous other accomplishments and awards nominations. I strongly feel that she more than meets requirements for Notability, but would love for you to check the article and see if it is good enough now or if I need to source more reference materiel.

Thanks again for encouraging me to work on the article more and not to be discouraged by some of the other editors I have interfaced with. Art javier (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Art_Javier sandbox 20:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xoloz! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, on April 2014 you deleted the Ming Xi page because of "Expired PROD, concern was: zero evidence of notability". I was wondering if you thought I could request a deletion review because this model has a huge notoriety in the modeling world. As an example of what the article could look like, you can check out the French one. I can provide some sources to you if you want me to. --MirandaKeurr (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you didn't research when you deleted this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autossh

See my comment in the talk page of the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.104.244.242 (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Kharkiv07 (T) 03:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Kharkiv07 (T) 00:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just discovered you deleted my page. I haven't logged in since creating it so I was never informed of the threat. You admit to a cursory investigation - and yes, my problem has been the paucity of information. I do now have some external links which will prove it existed if that's your beef? I really don't understand the problem. Obviously I am the primary source for a lot of information as this is something I've been researching for some years now. The interest is the key role the coffee bar played - it now looks to be the second espresso bar and the first discothèque in London. So can the page be retrieved or resurrected or will I have to create a new page? The wiki entry is quite important for obtaining contacts - Google's been a great help. It's difficult to know how interesting any subject may be outside the circle of those interested, right?

---

adrianstern — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrianstern (talk • contribs) 18:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I'm now rebuilding the article "JAM Liner" which once you deleted before. But I'll assure this article will be better than the old one. Bumbl_loid 20:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Xoloz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Presidency of William McKinley for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, William McKinley.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. CaroleHenson (talk) 04:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Legend of Zelda HD Experience. Since you had some involvement with the The Legend of Zelda HD Experience redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ultraconservatism. Since you had some involvement with the Ultraconservatism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World of Warcraft items and equipment. Since you had some involvement with the World of Warcraft items and equipment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably time to undelete David Walmsley. I just read that he is the Editor-in-Chief of The Globe and Mail. You apparently speedily deleted it under criterion A7 in April 2014. I didn't create that page, but being the Editor-in Chief of a major newspaper sounds like a credible claim to significance to me.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Mr. Guye: Xoloz has not edited since July 2014. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Steel1943: Ok, thanks for telling me. I still think the page should be undeleted. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  21:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Mr. Guye: You may need to inquire about that at WP:REFUND, unless you are planning on writing a new article at that title. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia-l. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia-l redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Myssouri. Since you had some involvement with the Myssouri redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Etherkiller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep^Talk 09:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current events portal pages before January 2001, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Current events portal pages before January 2001 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of the pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd say hey, as if I was in the Pixies. Hiding T 11:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xoloz

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect September 31, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 28 § September 31.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]