User talk:Soumyasch/archive 6

Hey Soum, I'm back now. Hope I didn't miss too much. :-) Anything in particular I should be paying attention to in the short term? -/- Warren 04:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I already have an ID "xpclient" but I prefer to edit anonymously. And just FYI, I'm not paid by MS or affiliated with MS in any way. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.181.33 (talk • contribs)

:) None of us are (which sometimes make me wonder, y r we doing this? :p). And I had suspected that you might be User:Xpclient. Anyways, edit as you are most comfortable. But your dyn ip makes it a bit harder to contact you. Keep up the good job. --soum (0_o) 09:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They changed how the delete page was structured, so I had to make a minor change. Just reload the new script and you should be set. Also, if you'll add your name to the list of users, I can know to notify you on script updates. Regards, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 13:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! Glad you sorted out the sockpuppet.. I'll have another go at Softgrid in a bit, I think I can add more to it. More work on SCVMM and Windows Server Virtualization coming soon too. ;) njan 13:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JPP.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOps my bad, I forgot all about it. It wasnt supposed to be around for so long! --soum (0_o) 04:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Acontrecourant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not think that Gracie the film has a similar storyline to Bend It Like Beckham? Or are we just not allowed to say such things? Cls14 22:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes fair enough. I should know such simple Wiki rules buy now.....lol Cls14 17:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock [1], could you block? Also, perhaps its time to start thinking about WP:DENY? Just a thought. -N 10:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Maybe we should start with deleting the category dedicated to him. --soum (0_o) 14:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry for the late reply. You can use the PL shot in any way you want. NerdyNSK 20:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server was sorely in need of some work, and I've substantially changed the article. Since you seem to have an interest in some of the other Windows Server articles, perhaps you might be kind enough to cast your eyes over this one and see what you think and if you have anything to add or any commentary to make? :) njan 19:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits! I did mean to {{cite}} those <ref>s, honest. ;) njan 18:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's good, if bulky. Being configurably-compactable is neat! The Microsoft sub-template could use some work; it seems like a bin into which a bunch of their products and other corporate information is thrown. At risk of over complicate things, I might consider something like splitting this out into three subtemplates - Business products (Windows Server, System Center, etc), Consumer products (most of their hardware, Desktop Windows, Games, etc), and Corporate Organisation (clumsy title), with corporate/investor/organisation-type information. The Windows Server packages could do with a refresh, too, as could the summaries of the line on some of the article pages; they can come across as something of a mishmash, and rebrands like SpeechServer/LCS/OCS and System Center aren't terribly reflected (or represented at all in this template), and there are some important products missing.. good work. :) njan 19:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenaimarre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imfedup.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Looks like we overlapped. I tend to block first and then post to talk afterwards... seems you do the opposite! :-) --Dweller 15:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I go to whichever page is closest to the mouse pointer. :D --soum (0_o) 15:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aah. Efficiency, I see. When is the convocation, btw? — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 15:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its not efficiency, its laziness. :P. And Tina Ambani has not yet figured out time to come and meet us, convo time hasnt yet been announced. Anyways, hope everything rocking at your end! U @Gandunagar? --soum (0_o) 15:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL no. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 15:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like my notification better. Lol. --Dweller 15:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So do I. :P, oops! --soum (0_o) 15:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Never seen AIV so quiet as it's been the last fortnight. Maybe RfA ain't broke after all. --Dweller 15:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're too fast! I came around to put the SQL 2008 info in and you'd already done it! :) -/- Warren 18:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Origamitpi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SEW950i.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Simone.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. And I probably just hit the wrong button by mistake when I deleted, I meant to hit I7. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 13:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noes, it won't. See WP:PERF. :) — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 15:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this in response to my comment at the betacommandbot thread at AN? Then, did I say it would hit performance? Sorry, if I did, coz I meant to say it would waste resources, by which I meant human resources. Undoing the tagging would require serious effort from the editors. --soum ^talk 15:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zOMG! ROLLBACK! — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 15:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll be able to provide a GFDL image soon so that we don't have to have this discussion. I should know in a day or two. Hope you are well, JACOPLANE • 2007-06-6 23:29

Thanks for uploading Image:Click1c.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Moe ε 23:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have the ability to rename images? -/- Warren 18:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have to be blooddy joking. Did you fail to notice the most blatant of Wikipedia:Username policy violations to even suggest issuing warnings instead of blocking. --  Netsnipe  ►  14:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wonder how I can add the band Embracing to the wikipedia/musician pages. Since my old band Naglfar is accessible in Wikipedia. Please advice. :) Embracing 14:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your an admin so you should know. What does the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate page mean when it says "Change the time on the RfA page to indicate the current time." what am I supposed to do? :) Chetblong 16:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) Chetblong 16:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You asked a question on the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chetblong page: "you have left the discussion. This means you left it unresolved, which does not give me much confidence in your ability to resolve content disputes. " I just wanted to tell you I did not leave that unresolved I asked you a question and you didn't answer. And I plan to resolve this issue. :) Chetblong 17:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to what you said on the Criticism of Windows Vista page. -- :) Chetblong 17:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I need your help on this dispute before I do anything stupid. Since you're an admin, you probably have better judgement. Do you think he should be reverting to his version before discussion is over? — Alex^(U|C|E) 23:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't online. When in a dispute first thing to do is to make sure no one keeps reverting to their own version. Talk it out first. So, whenever people are pushing their own version, get the article protected. Using WP:RFPP is probably a better option than requesting an admin because the admin might not be online at that time. But if you are sure that s/he is online, personal request will have a quicker response. Keep in mind that protection does not mean endorsement of that version, so if a wrong version is protected (which is always the case, depending on PoV :D) dont mean it cant be changed. If there has been a prior consensus, point that out in the request. The admin will decide if that version has merits to be the protected version. When the article is protected, discuss, preferably on the article talk page. If it does not seem to lead anywhere, call an RfC, invite others to comment and follow the dispute resolution procedure, as Jossi has said.

Regarding the dispute, I am ill suited to make a comment, because I am hardly aware of the subject. But the point made by Kuban kazak (talk · contribs) about breaking consistency seems valid. You should probably invite other editors who contributed to the article to make a comment. Regards, and all the best. --soum ^talk 07:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is fairly similar to the Kiev/Kyiv dispute. As for talking it out, trying to talk it out with him doesn't really work. He goes into personal/national attacks during discussions. — Alex^(U|C|E) 07:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the user has been blocked multiple times for 3RR violation and personal attacks. I will be keeping an eye on him. Btw, great work with that logo. --soum ^talk 07:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think you'll find this interesting. By the way, User:Althepal deserves most of the credit for the logo, my reworked logo was based on his concept. I was just lucky enough to have the Segoe font. :-) — Alex^(U|C|E) 07:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Somehow I'm leaning towards starting Wikipedia:Ukrainian language policy, this is the only language that seems to have those disputes on Wikipedia. You think I should do that? — Alex^(U|C|E) 10:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure calling it a policy this early is not a good idea. But yeah having something to guide in the case of disputes is definitely worth it. IMO, it should be a proposed guideline. I would also suggest you write a first draft in userspace, get a peer review and some support before moving it to the wikipedia namespace. --soum ^talk 10:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wasn't going to post it to Wikipedia namespace right away. I might have some people from the WikiProject help me out. — Alex^(U|C|E) 10:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan. :D You should definitely go for it. Even if nothing comes out, the discussion will be of great help in further disputes. Language disputes are pretty frustrating. You wont believe there has been a huge debate whether Jana Gana Mana (the Indian National Anthem, originally written in Classical Bengali, adopted as the national anthem of a country whose national language is Hindi) should be written in Hindi or Bengali. It cant get any more lame than this!!! :P --soum ^talk 10:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. What are your suggestions for a name, though? :-) — Alex^(U|C|E) 11:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, tough question. You can start with any name, it can be refined as content gets added. How about "Ukranian naming guideline"? --soum ^talk 11:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll sleep on it. But I plan to cover more than just naming, maybe something along the lines of "Wikipedia:Ukrainian language guidelines". — Alex^(U|C|E) 11:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A generic name is probably better. :) --soum ^talk 11:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll think of something and let you know tomorrow. I'll have you look over it, too, so that it makes sense to somebody unfamiliar with the topic. — Alex^(U|C|E) 11:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw that you vectorized quite a few images. Could you please lend a hand vectorizing this image? Resizing the raster image is blurring the text, and the original size is eating up lots of real estate. Thanks. --soum ^talk 07:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, I can do it for you. :-) — Alex^(U|C|E) 07:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure. Thanks a lot, bro! :) --soum ^talk 07:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You caught me just as I was using Inkscape. :-) (Image:Aero.svg) I'll get started right now. — Alex^(U|C|E) 07:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let me know if you want anything changed. — Alex^(U|C|E) 09:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Would it be possible to change all lines and text (text, more importantly) to black? --soum ^talk

Ha! That's what slowed me down in the first place. :-) Will take care of it right now. — Alex^(U|C|E) 09:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve it. :) Enjoy. --soum ^talk 09:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Alex^(U|C|E) 09:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great. :) You deserve this.--soum ^talk 09:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! :-) — Alex^(U|C|E) 09:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now 74.211.84.233 (talk · contribs) works also as user Betanon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Both are socks of an account blocked indefinitely for the same vandalisms (I do not remember the user name). Thanks for blocking the first one but the other is obviously the same guy (please note using of the same expletive in edit summaries). --Friendly Neighbour 15:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --soum ^talk 15:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! --Friendly Neighbour 15:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Cya around. Regards, --soum ^talk 15:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, which format do I export in from Inkscape? Stealing your trade secrets (:D), I downloaded Inkscape yesterday and drew something, which is rendering fine in Inkscape, and also exporting fine as a raster image. But when I am uploading the SVG (plain SVG), its getting all screwed up. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Here is the source (Inkscape SVG) file. --soum ^talk 07:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one thing MediaWiki really hates is flowed text. Try not to use it that much, use regular text boxes. Also, remember to set the page size to the same as your drawing's size. I'm fixing it right now for you. By the way, it is best to save as Plain SVG. — Alex^(U|C|E) 08:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it tomorrow, it's late here. You can see my attempt to fix it here. — Alex^(U|C|E) 08:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. :) I think I can fix the rest myself. Good night. --soum ^talk 08:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally its done. Thanks a ton. . --soum ^talk 09:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Sorry, somehow I managed to miss your reply on my talk page. — Alex^(U|C|E) 23:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting the repetitive Nikki R. Keddie article, but shouldn't the associated talk page have been deleted as well?--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 09:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - help please! This morning you deleted my page Teawaker due to "Blatant Copyright Infringement" and I have absolutely no idea why. I invented the word Teawaker myself and wrote the text (effectively quoted) myself. How can it be a copyright problem? As I am new to Wikipedia I have no idea how to cite thigs correctly or how to name myself as an author. I do not particularly wish to advertise myself or my website, www.teasmade,com - simply to define the word teawaker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheridan H (talk • contribs)

Your idea sounds fine. If anything like that happens, there are always details to work out, such as the exact name, etc. Do we want one per week? Or, if 3 months is too long, how about a slate of several people each month? Do we want minimum requirements so as not to disappoint editors (such as 250 quality edits, with the candidate or nominator determining himself/herself what is a "quality" edit. The candidate could always contend that 1,000 minor edits and no quality edits is worthy of recognition)VK35 19:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A user (who ought to know better) is repeatedly attempting to add a number of new screenshots from Apple's web site into this article. Can you review this and comment? Thanks. -/- Warren 16:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Recipient,

'Somatic Movement Coach' is a professional title recognised through ISMETA (International Somatic Movement Education and Therapy Association) and through the United States of America Department of Labour.

ISMETA has a page on wikipedia so do other ISMETA recognised fields like FELDENKRAIS.

The article intends to advise the general public about this particular way of coaching within the Somatic Movement professional field.

Could you please advice what is needed to get the article approved?

Thank you.

Jacques van Eijden ISMS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somaticmovementcoach (talk • contribs)

Hello, why did you remove the reference I added to the Software transactional memory page ? The reference I added is a valid description. Here is the delta :

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_transactional_memory&diff=137915913&oldid=137276322 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyplm (talk • contribs)

Ok no pblm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyplm (talk • contribs)

Thank you for at least offering to undelete the image if I could get it released (I have the original, and if that happens I will just upload it to Commons). But really ... one week? Please remind me about one of my problems with this policy — that it was created and enforced by people who don't have practical experience working with celebrities and their publicists, who substitute "their opinion" for real-life experience. Daniel Case 22:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God. The woman who took the photo is being a real bitch about it. Says she's afraid she won't make any money (her huge portfolio of celebrity, fashion and advertising photos notwithstanding) if she starts doing that. So I'm looking at some other ones.

Of course, I have offered to start an article about her (she easily meets WP:N; she's done a lot of celebrity photography) if that changes her mind. I may even do that if she keeps saying no (which will, of course, affect what sources I use ... hello LEXIS! Wonder what I might find there). Daniel Case 04:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

but why. I really don't understand what's wrong with it... it's really frustiating and ill still read it and all. why can't I "self nom"???? 207.162.58.3 15:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the only screenshots available. It is not possible to use other screenshots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kris33 (talk • contribs)

I know, I did not say use different screenshot, I said their usage has to be restricted. --soum ^talk 08:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Windows Server domain article as it stands is rather odd, and should ideally be merged as indicated above. Thoughts? (Merge talk) njan 19:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about this subect, too. The thing is, Windows Server domains in NT 3 and 4 have nothing to do with Active Directory, and Active Directory Application Mode has nothing to do with Windows Server domains. Another approach would be to rename "Windows Server domain" to "Windows NT domain" and focus the article on the earlier domain model.

On the same subject, maybe we should also be looking at merging the various articles on domain controllers and FSMOs and that kind of thing. -/- Warren 19:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something needs to be done with them, for sure, and Soumyash's comments on the talk page do have a certain logic to them - actually, there is no NT Domain Article, something I hadn't realised. I think refactoring the Windows Server domain article as an NT Domain article and positioning it to sit alongside the Active Directory article as a companion isn't a bad idea.

I'm less sure about some of those. I think some articles, like the FSMO one, benefit from being independent. The Domain Controller article certainly seems a little stub-like and should either be fleshed out or merged. njan 19:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separating NT domains out seems like a good idea. And Active Directory is used for a lot of things, may be separating out the various roles might help go deeper into each. As for domain controllers, well, there were primary domain controllers and backup controllers, but that got deprecated. Now read only controllers are back again. So, it can have significant stuff. I will try to chalk out a layout for the series of articles, and put it up for discussion. --soum ^talk 10:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my apologies for not clearly reading your comments and reading more into them than there actually was. I offered further commentary on the talk page over there. Cheers. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. :) --soum ^talk 08:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"mahakuma" is probably "block". Not sure about "kachhari", it may be something like "court", as in court of law, or, as in court of kings or zamindars.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me correct this: a Mahakuma (মহকুমা) is a subdivision of a district. [2]. A Kachari কাছারি is a court of justice, a law court; a magistrate's court, a kachhari, a cutcherry; an office; a zamindar's (জমিদারের) or a feudal lord's court and office. [3]. Please refer to the online Samsad Bangla dictionary. Thanks. --Ragib 07:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i note that you deleted this (while i was overhauling it to make it in to a wikipedia appropriate article). It's been created by a newbie, and whilst in desperate need of attention from an experienced editor (which i was in the process of doing), it was a valid article, on a notable charity operating in the UK. I have recreated it for this reason, and i hope you can see that it is an appropriate subject. Any comments welcome on my talk page. Regards Owain.davies 14:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for that, i'll beat it in to shape over the next few days! Owain.davies 18:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:aiv and uaa. Crunch13 18:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me if you think this article is an ad? I can't tell as good as you might be able to. Dynamic Submission. Please respond to my talk page. :) Chetblong 16:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Soumyasch ... I have asked PeaceNT (talk · contribs) to protect 2007 in music for the same reason that they protected 2008 in music last night ... the anon. vandal from Jakarta is back:

• 61.94.192.85 (talk · contribs)
• 61.94.193.201 (talk · contribs)
• 61.5.92.136 (talk · contribs)

The first two are in the "companion" range we identified that was Too Large to block, and the third is from the range that was temporarily blocked.

Frack me for even bothering to check up on this again after last night! :-) Happy Editing! —72.75.70.147 (talk · contribs) 07:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this was a mistake or not, but in your one month block, you didn't turn on account creation blocked, so the vandal could create a new account right now. --(Review Me) R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 13:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like the fact that you attempted to censor my valid point re Xena and Hercules. If one can write about Wonderwoman as part of modern literature then why cann't TV series be also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davinashetty (talk • contribs)

BTW, can you protect my userpage from creation, as I really don't want one and before it was a source of vandalism. Thanks! --Evilclown93_(talk) 11:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Evilclown93_(talk) 12:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Soumyasch You have deleted my contribution CBSE Websitesterming it as spam. The websites I mentioned are totally free and are providing latest information. Anubhav --User talk:59.94.244.168

You took 82.109.64.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) off of admin intervension of vandal. stating you gave him a one day block, well you DIDN'T. Please put the one day block on him, as it doesn't appear you doing anything and you aren't on his history. Warrush 13:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It still doesn't show it on mine http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:82.109.64.166&action=history and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:82.109.64.166 Warrush 13:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, sorry I didn't know that. Warrush 14:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Madmariecostello must be blocked for edits to Acid rain.--Tdjzcsdrpf 13:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No administrators have commented yet... Not sure what to do about it. — Alex^(U|C|E) 14:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the WP:RFP request... — Alex^(U|C|E) 14:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I'm not trying to push you to help, I just have no idea what to do myself. — Alex^(U|C|E) 05:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You think I should go ahead and go for WP:RFC? Or should I wait? — Alex^(U|C|E) 05:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The mediator went on a break, so I moved it up to MedCom. I'm not sure, I'm thinking about giving the guy (Kuban kazak) a second chance, but I have a feeling he'll just go on restoring his revisions of articles. — Alex^(U|C|E) 06:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the advice. I'll see what he does today/tomorrow. If he continues, RfC it is. — Alex^(U|C|E) 06:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats up with deleting the Reed Tucker page? He is actually a real guy. He's the useless producer of the Lazlow Show. (lazlow dot com)

While the biography is a little comedic it does have truth to it.

The name is also used in GTA3 but he is real. He just used his own name as the character name. But the page is definately no hoax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.182.170 (talk • contribs)