User talk:Warren

Hello, Warren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 180.242.21.5 (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1 — January / February 2006 Archive 2 — March / April 2006 Archive 3 — May / June 2006 Archive 4 — July / Aug / Sep 2006 Archive 5 — Oct / Nov 2006 Archive 6 — Dec / Jan / Feb 2007 Archive 7 — Mar / Apr 2007 Archive 8 — May / Jun 2007 Archive 9 — Jul - Dec 2007 Archive 10 — Jan - Mar 2008 Archive 11 — Apr - Aug 2008 Archive 12 — Sep / Oct 2008 Archive 13 — Nov / Dec 2008 Archive 14 — Jan - May 2009 Archive 15 — Jun 2009 - Aug 2013 Archive 16 — Sep 2013 - Nov 2017

Hi, Please take your issues to the talkpage, I'm not fussed who's right or wrong point is you've both gone over WP:3rr so you both need to discuss otherwise your both going to end up blocked, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 05:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add but you may want to read WP:BRD (You were Bold, You were Reverted and now you need to Discuss) - It's all to easy to smack revert but I know from past ecperience smacking revert doesn't solve a thing and instead it essentially digs you into a deeper hole, Anyway you both need to discuss it and if you can't come to any sort of resolution then you can try WP:DRN, WP:30 or WP:RFC, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 05:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Look, what I am going to say is just a tip from an old timer to another; feel free to ignore it, no hard feelings.

Good beneficiary actions in Wikipedia have previously been stopped and banned because the person doing them gave a bad impression. For example, Archive.is is an awesome service but it was banned here for a very long time, because its maintainer did fishy stuff that put everyone into skeptical mode. See? A good thing got banned because it rubbed people the wrong way.

Let's assume Security and Maintenance must really and truly be moved to Windows Defender Security Center. Let's assume, right? With your aggressive editing in the wrong place and your bulldozer attitude, it won't happen. Face it: You gave a bad impression. Imagine Wikipedia as a huge building under construction. Bringing a wrecking ball to a long-completed wing of the building in which people have been living for years, and then giving the excuse that "it is a work in progress anyway" and "newer maps say such and such" does not fly with anyone.

That said, Windows 10 is a soup in which competing components have co-existed for three years now: Control Panel and Settings, Windows Photo Viewer and Photos, Internet Explorer and Edge, Paint and Paint 3D, Windows Media Player and Groove Music, Windows Command Prompt and Windows PowerShell... Windows 10 is approaching the end of its mainstream support and I won't be surprised if this civil war doesn't end by then (at which point it will never end).

FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 22:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FleetCommand: A cursory review of the edit history for that article will show that I didn't rename the article. Someone else did that. All I did was observe that the article name didn't match the lead section, so I thought, hey, here's something to do (because I care about good lead sections), and I fixed it up. I don't care much one way or the other what that article is named right now. Reality is, "Secure and Maintenance" will be removed in a future Windows 10 version and the article will get renamed then. Warren -talk- 00:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah. That's the worst thing that could happen: People have negative attitude towards what you do but that's not even your fault; somebody else (in this case, Imgif) tripped their tripwire. But that doesn't mean you can't do anything about it. Okay, for a long time, I thought what I am going to say is a nasty trick, but it turns out it isn't. When someone does something stupid, like what Imgif did, you can become part of those people who have gone into defensive mood. Then, you show them good quality work and actually become their hero. It is not nasty or a trick because, what you do is good quality work in lieu of a consensus you yourself suggested. Becoming the hero is just a consequence. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 04:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had reverted my changes to the article Darwin_(operating_system). The information remove is pure product details which has its place in a product brochure rather than in a Wikipedia article. A long list of past and current revisions of the software does not add any information. The information needs to be removed as WP:NOTJARGON Hagennos (talk) 17:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hagennos: There is considerable precedent for this, starting with Google Chrome version history, Internet Explorer version history, Firefox version history and Safari version history. These articles have all existed for a number of years. It's not just browsers, either -- we have a whole category called Category:Software version histories devoted to tracking exactly the kind of content you are proposing removing from the encyclopedia. If you really believe what you're trying to argue here, then you should submit all these articles to WP:AFD and see what the community thinks of those beliefs. Warren -talk- 17:49, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Windows XP Event Viewer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI, <span style="color: X">[[A]]</span> will not apply the desired color to the link. What you want to do is move the span inside the displayed text portion of the link e.g. [[A|<span style="color: X">B</span>]].

With your signature, that would be going from:

<b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> -> Warren -talk-

to something like:

<b>[[User:Warren|<span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;">Warren</span>]] [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> -> Warren -talk-

--Izno (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. The colour did work when I first created it, mind you this was over 10 years ago. Warren -talk- 15:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Power Macintosh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IDE and MIPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

As you are one of the top ten contributors to the macOS and macOS Server articles, I thought perhaps you might be interested in participating in the Templates for Discussion entry for {{MacOS derivations}}. This template is a navbox. The discussion is stalled because of a lack of contributors.

To summarize the long conversation there (and the changes that happened afterwards), IMHO, this navbox:

• Is redundant to the {{Apple Inc. operating systems}} navbox. Whatever benefit {{MacOS derivations}} offers can be integrated into the former via editing.
• Diseminates unreferenced information. A navbox should only help navigate.

As such, it should either be deleted or merged. Currently, this discussion is only attended by the template's creator, and one other anonymous editor (IP) who doesn't have any other contributions to Wikipedia.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mac OS History has been nominated for merging with Template:Apple Inc. operating systems. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. - Paul^T+/_C 04:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_3XfKYHkieGKBpCl&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revision on Power Mac G4, the name of the article and its abbreviations, synonyms, and foreign language translations are bold the first time they are mentioned in the lead section of the article if the lead section can mention the full names without awkward wording per MOS:BOLDTITLE. This doesn’t apply to sections. Interqwark ^{talk contribs} 00:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Interqwark: Sure it does. Per MOS:BOLD:

“

The most common use of boldface is to highlight the first occurrence of the title word/phrase of the article (and usually its synonyms) in the lead section. This is also done, at the first occurrence in running text, of a term that is redirected to the article or one of its subsections, whether the term appears in the lead or not.

”

I have bolded the part that you need to understand. There are other articles that point to sections of the Power Mac G4 article, based on the name of each generation of the product. This justifies the bolding of the Power Mac G4's various names.

Also, I will repeat the reminder you've already received that editing articles to change one style to another is not appropriate behaviour on the encyclopedia. Is this going to be an ongoing problem with you? I hope not. Wikipedia needs productive editors who curate and improve content, not people who waste time lecturing experienced editors on style guidelines they haven't read. — Warren. ‘ talk , 02:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You’re fully right. I didn’t know this since MOS:BOLDTITLE doesn’t mention it. My apologies. I’ve edited Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section so that MOS:BOLDTITLE also mentions this so that others won’t miss this information like I did.

This matter isn’t about style in the same sense. What you linked to was a post about spaces in headings, which don’t change the appearance of the article outside source editing mode. I don’t see how it’s relevant.

Thanks for explaining! I’ve reverted my revisions on Power Mac G4. Interqwark ^{talk contribs} 02:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox OS component has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox software. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a discussion on a similar topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 18:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shakori (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Booting process of Windows NT, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booting process of Windows NT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]