User talk:I need a name

Welcome!

Hello, I need a name, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  TomStar81 (Talk) 22:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Heavengamesforums.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 19:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read it, and don't revert me again, please. Eddie Guimont 14:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't I know you?--Owl 2 19:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC) P.S I'm Windu223, my wikipedia username is Owl 2.[reply]

• If you mean from Wookieepedia, yes. -- I need a name 19:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For making sure the Jedi Exile article stays correct with regards to canon gender --69.19.14.23 09:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You really shouldn’t randomly revert edits that go against the consensus of the article. I’m not trying to come down on you but I’ve noticed you’ve reverted several edits that go against that with any real explanation. Please discuss in the talk page before making such edits, it would really help a lot. Thank you. --The Matrix Prime 05:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Don't do it. Vasconcello da Gama 09:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jedi Exile. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --EEMeltonIV 18:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kreia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --EEMeltonIV 18:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and a whole bunch of others. User:Vasconcello da Gama is a new account whose content is derogatory, OR, or just plain nonsense. Rather than enter into an edit war, next time flag the user at WP:AN/3RR. --EEMeltonIV 18:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

V da G made a couple of reverts after I placed an identical pair of 3RR warnings on that user's page; brought it up at WP:AN/3RR and the editor has been indefinitely blocked. (He also did a near copy-and-paste trying to report you; clearly, you were not blocked.) Sometimes the system works. Happy editing! --EEMeltonIV 19:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IE7XP.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this revert: Common usage is to leave an appropriate warning on the user/IP talk page after reverting a vandalism edit. —AldeBaer 16:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

for the revert on my user page, and sorry for my faulty re-revert ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the catch on Algebra. I put in a note to AIV, so hopefully that will stop it for a bit. --Bfigura ^(talk) 17:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up my links on the Black Mesa page, my apologies for the errors. Besieged (talk) 20:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When Wales, Beesley and Penchina are expressing concerns themselves over the situation, that makes it "controversial". Stop vandalising just because you now have epeen issues. Random quote you must have missed in the reference: "I am sad to say that I really did not anticipate this or know anything about the history here." - Jimbo Wales. This is a very controversial acquisition and may yet lead to a law suit or even a class action. Leave the article alone if you are just going to stomp around in there with your POV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.242.194 (talk • contribs)

• That's great. Now all you need to do is actually source it. -- I need a name 14:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IE7XP.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your business Bub Namsdrawkcab (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/You need a name for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. cf38^talk 16:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Case closed, no evidence of abuse as been shown. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See section following. It appears a few accounts have been created to impersonate I need a name (talk · contribs). —Wknight94 (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted an item at WP:AN/I about YNAN, who claims to be an alter-ego for this account. Given the history of people coming up with similar names for vandalism and YNAN's edits to other editors' user pages, I doubt the veracity of YNAN's claim. Either way, please chime in. --EEMIV (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm also sysop on the Irish Language wikipedia. Recently, the following account was created and indulged in some minor vandalism. Can you possibly confirm whether this is you or not (before I block :) )? Thanks - Alison ^❤ 01:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another admin tipped me off on my talk page that the above editor wasn't you and that you'd been having problems. I went ahead and blocked it (I'm admin over there) but if you need to usurp that account, I can talk to the local 'crat over there and see if I can sort something out - Alison ^❤ 08:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Kreia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Steam default.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for helping revert the constant vandalism to the Princess Leia article. Apparently, that IP editor didn't notice the bikini image was already being used towards the bottom of the page! :) — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 23:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit to Ubuntu (Linux distribution)? Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up that spout of vandalism this morning from that IP address. I knew the kids sitting next to me were talking about it the whole time, but could only revert one instance myself, fearing they might see me. Thank you for keeping Wikipedia sound, and responding in a timely fashion :) --Ybbor^Talk 00:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Tubgirl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. frogger3140 (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Tubgirl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. frogger3140 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings editor. I see that you have made a few edits on articles related to Muse, and am therefore inviting you to support the Muse task force I am creating! Simply sign your name (~~~~) and leave any comments you want to (optional), under the 'Participants' heading. Please show your support, and keep up the good work! Thanks, hope to see you there!

Thanks! Andre666 (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's with all the "Urgh"'s? [1] I appreciate the guy is making not-too-helpful changes, but you haven't even left a message on his talk page or the article talk page. It's pretty rude to make snide unhelpful remarks when reverting people's good faith edits. naerii 15:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my typographical fixes. KAMiKAZOW (talk) 16:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed you reverted that guy's edit on my userpage. Thanks a lot! A _talk 21:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but:

1. MusicBrainz lists it as 'EP'
2. Coldplay's official site also lists it as 'EP'
3. The back of the album's sleeve lists it as 'EP'
4. The fact that "It's what it is, not its name" doesn't mean a thing, since I have -and know- many EPs which don't have an EP on its end on every place you search.

--≤ ^alvareo [talk to me] ≥ 16:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my page deleted--AK193 (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)AK193[reply]

What was wrong with IG-72 why was it taken of this site AK193 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AK193 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heya, thanks for clarifying my Lost!/Lost+ confusion :) Mister sparky (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

is that you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaelumArisen (talk • contribs) 01:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. -- I need a name (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that you have been involved in the low-level edit war taking place on Garry's Mod and was hoping that you would take the time to weigh in on an RfC related to the dispute: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Otis1017. Best regards, ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought he was an obvious troll, TBH. -- I need a name (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had considered that possibility, and I will be reporting him to AIV if this RfC dies unnoticed (which I think will probably happen). ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC was noticed at the last second, so it will probably be around for some time to come. Would you consider supporting it or at least adding your take, so some action can be taken? ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you insisting on using a lowercase 'f' in the title 'No Surprises/Running From Demons'? You undid my amendment with the reason 'Nope', if you want to stand up for your edit you need to be more explanative than that. Lopifalko (talk) 08:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I linked it to this helpful page about capitalisation in titles. Here's another, more specific one. Also note that No Surprises/Running From Demons is a redlink, while No Surprises/Running from Demons isn't, due to the latter having the correct capitalisation. If you want, I'll also find a bunch of instances of the 'from' in tracklists in various album articles, just to give an example of articles that follow the capitalisation guidelines in the MoS. -- I need a name (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's news to me, capitalisation rules must have changed since I learned them, thanks for the education and apologies for the hassle. I didn't notice you'd hyperlinked 'Nope', so sorry again for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lopifalko (talk • contribs) 14:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before we start edit warring over Trouble (Coldplay song)‎, I suggest we discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Thank you. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 13:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- I need a name (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you tell me how File:HardestPart.svg is inaccurate? I'll try and fix it, if I can, because SVG is such a superior format to JPEG. Thanks, Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I checked it and concluded it was inaccurate, but IIRC:

1. The font along the side is wrong (it should be Albertus)
2. The blocks are the wrong shape (they should be square) and colour
3. The dashes are the wrong shape and colour (they should be red rectangles)

I considered fixing it a while ago, but then I figured it would just be easier to use an already existing JPG of the cover, rather than trying to figure out the exact dimensions and stuff for recreating it. -- I need a name (talk) 13:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll have a go at fixing it soon. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 19:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, answer my question on the Firefox talk page regarding your opinion on the screenshot used in the Infobox. --Rprpr (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide any proof that the White Shadows single cover is not official? All of the other singles in the set have similar images, and the image in question was on a third party website, so I'm loathe to delete the image without proof that it's a hoax. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I posted my reasoning on Talk:White Shadows awhile ago, when the exact same image was used in the article. To expand on that, the colours (red, purple, orange, yellow and green) don't match the other singles. It also doesn't match the promo CDs for the X&Y singles, which have the blocks embossed instead of coloured, like this. There's no CD single release, so it can't be from that. -- I need a name (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been dearly missed at the Firefox article. Come back! Thanks! ҭᴙᴇᴡӌӌ 00:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fictional Jimbo Wales. Since you had some involvement with the Fictional Jimbo Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Tideflat (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please read and comment on the Know Your Enemy talk page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Theresistance.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Everything Must Go (Manic Street Preachers album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saturday Live (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read and comment: Keane talk page. -- JGenz (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Need to start looking deeper into revision histories... --prmcd16 👽 ^(u)•(t) 20:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings! I see you removed the "no retail release" claim from the These Are My Twisted Words article saying it "hasn't been true since November 2016". I agree the claim should be removed for other reasons, especially if it's not in the source, but to my knowledge the song still hasn't had a retail release. I'm curious. Did I miss something? Popcornduff (talk) 18:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was released for paid download/streaming early November 2016, around the same time as some other Radiohead releases which had previously only had limited availability. -- I need a name (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. As it happens I think "retail" in music sales refers to physical copies, so if that's true, then it's correct to say it's never had a retail release. I can't back that definition up with anything, though. Popcornduff (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, and not because I am going to get into an argument with you, BMI nearly agrees with you, they list the same with the exception of Stoermer. As for ASCAP entry of Caution, totally different. If you have the booklet, how about checking the album article for further inaccuracies. If the BMI/ASCAP entries had agreed, I would have gone with them, over and above any other source, but this time they disagree. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting the error. I discovered the guy has been spamming in quite a number of articles and was going through them all. I was meant to compare the latest edit and his/her edit but ended up undoing all subsequent edits. Cheers for correcting my mistake. Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 22:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Fictional Jimbo Wales has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Fictional Jimbo Wales until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for catching the date error. I accidentally entered year for day. Alkollar (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]