User talk:Mahahahaneapneap

Big textI will reply wherever you asked the question, so if you leave me a message here, please watch this page. Alternatively, let me know where you want me to reply and I will do so. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know you've

• Bulleted list itemBig text

been here a while, but everybody deserves a boilerplate welcome :-)

Welcome! Hello, Mahahahaneapneap, and [[Wikiped--2600:1:990F:F7A8:D475:391D:4227:51AE (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)ia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:[reply]

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC) hai have good day.[reply]

Please add whose album and the albums title in the summary. Thanks. feydey 13:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please add a source to Image:BlackHolesAndRevalationsCover.JPG. Thanks. Mahahahaneapneap 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is source a requirement for album covers on English Wikipedia now? I moved it from Commons (definitely misplaced by other user there), but you could delete image if you want. --EugeneZelenko 14:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've responded to your enquiry on the help desk.

Hope it helps!

EvocativeIntrigue _{TALK | EMAIL} 20:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the edits to the Muse singles pages. I think I might have missed a fair bit of information out. It's only the basics so far. Xtrememachineuk 22:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Muse are my favourite band and I enjoy adding content to their pages. Thanks for creating the new articles. --Mahahahaneapneap 16:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Please see my response to your question at Wikipedia:Help desk#Song Lyrics. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your recent edits, I have to say I can see what you mean when you say Bear Wood is not in Bournemouth; though it could be argued that parts of it are. it is often lumped in with Bournemouth as you cannot approach it directly from the conurbation without passing through Bournemouth. However, the Bear Cross roundabout is in Bournemouth; the border is about half a mile down the Magna Road. I suppose it all depends on how far these rather amorphous areas extend. Britmax 17:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's no big deal, but Wikipedia discourages edits like this. See Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken.--Mathew5000 04:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you go to Poole Grammar as you seem to hav made lots of edits to the Poole Grammar wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexsheppard11 (talk • contribs) 21:04, Aug 21, 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I do. I'm going into year 10 this september... Mahahahaneapneap 23:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you notice someone is doing a mass editing (eg on Muse albums), please do no interfere (even if you are trying to help), as it may cause edition conflicts.

I removed the external link to your Lostpedia user page on your Wikipedia user page because it's on the meta:Spam blacklist. The link stopped me from fixing your userboxes. Just to let you know. --Harryboyles 07:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. Thanks for letting me know Mahahahaneapneap 14:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mahahahaneapneap! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you've reuploaded some album covers from the iTunes Store. While it is nice to have higher resolution versions, it goes against our fair use policy. You see, in order for our use of the images to be legal, we can't interfere with the copyright holder's ability to make a profit off of the works. In this case, we have to make sure it wouldn't be possible for someone to use the image to, say, use the image to sell illegal copies. So when uploading fair use images, it's actually better to have a low resolution version. ShadowHalo 06:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have not actually uploaded any of these album covers for several months, but I won't upload any more. I will try to replace all of these images with lower resolution versions. Mahahahaneapneap 12:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work fixing the vandalism of the AA419 page. It's not the first time that it's happened, so you'll need to keep tabs on that page for the forseeable future. You've doubtless figured out that the people who are doing the vandalism are the same scammers who are targetted by AA419. In a way, it's a back-handed compliment. After all, if the AA419 crew weren't having any effect, the vandals wouldn't bother defacing their web-page.

I see that way back in the day you added the official (licensed) lyrics to a few Muse songs. (On this a heartfelt handshake for resisting the temptation to go the easy/copyvio way.) I've just cleaned out a bunch of copyvio links from the Muse singles articles, and I was wondering how you determined the correct php page on Muse's website to link -- is there a way to see the url behind it, or did you just use trial and error?

Thanks! - Revolving Bugbear 21:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I had a specific way of doing this. I used the non-flash version of the website which used to be linked from the main page before the website was redesigned. From there, go to Discography --> Lyrics and then the album and song you want. When the lyrics come up, right click in the frame and then go to properties (depending on which browser you're using) to find the URL of the lyrics. Unfortunately, the page has not been updated to include Hullabaloo or Black Holes & Revelations and probably won't ever be seeing as how the last news article was in September 2006. Well done for all your work on the Muse articles :) Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 08:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just reread my response to you at FPC and I realise I was harsh to the point of being rude. Not wrong, but rude. Sorry - Wikilove. Dhatfield (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further information on the GiX will be included very soon. Both detailed and Gix images will be provided as soon as obtained from the writer.

This is not a hoax, prank, improbable theory nor stupidity, in order for the rest of the information to upload, the user will need an average of 60 days to write the rest of the information, once or twice a week the extra details plus images will be uploaded.

So please wait, if no changes happen within the next 60 days this page can be deleted without a fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SWLOTR4712 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to warn you that this map is something wrong. Here are some hints to improve it:

1. The South Tyrol in Italy is mainly German speaking and should be added to the map;
2. Gaeltacht regions in Ireland and Celtic speaking areas In Great Britain should be marked, especially thiose where the language is more vigorous;
3. I wouldn't separate Norwegian (both Bokmål and Nynorsk, even if the latter is somewhat more different) from Swedish and Danish: especially when written, these languages are mutually intelligible; a better division would be Insular Scandinavian (Icelandic and Faroese vs. Continental Scandinavian.

Best regards-- Carnby (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you linked dates here. Per MOS:SYL, linking dates is a deprecated practice, so links are to be unlinked now. Thanks. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 01:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dorset Senior Cup, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorset Senior Cup. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Please do not take this personally. Please feel free to contest deletion. If you do so, I would strongly suggest expanding the article in order to make it more authoritative and reduce the likelihood of it being deleted or merged in future. Regards, HJ Mitchell (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you compress SVG file ? Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 19:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting my spelling error on CPWD --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#PNG better than SVG if the logo is copyrighted ?. Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 16:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you so much, that would be great. My email is: masterofhisowndomain@hotmail.com. Looking forward to the invitation. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 10:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've signed up. What do I do now? MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted because Tyrenius created the image and in his view it was incorrect. I suggest you leave it alone. However I should have left an explanation...Modernist (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tested the images in photoshop, and the colors are objectively the same. When you look at the two at full size, they also appear the same. However, when viewed at thumbnail size in the article, the borders of the png are fuzzier. This makes some colors, especially the magenta in the bottom right, appear darker than they should be. I would tend to agree with Modernist in this case. Lithoderm 17:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are not at all the same on my monitor. It may be a question of gamma and other settings. See Talk:The_Raft_of_the_Medusa#Colours. The PNG image was 1KB and I believe this was too low to exactly duplicate the original colours, so there was a compromise. I have now uploaded a PNG of 3KB, which matches the original exactly on my monitor. Is there any objection to now deleting File:Medusa-Palette-1.png as it has been replaced by the new PNG in the article (it will be CSD sole contributor request)? Ty 03:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tested in Photoshop, which does give the same colour values for the GIF and the first PNG. The problem occurs with Firefox as a browser. I've tested in Internet Explorer, and it's OK there. The second PNG image which I uploaded works fine in both, so it makes sense to stick with that. Ty 16:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone for the input. I'm OK with whatever looks best to everyone in the article. Mahahahaneapneap (talk)

Hi there

Why did you change my revision of the cast for this page? I know Barbara is not married for most of her episodes, but in 'Marriage' she gets married to Pavlov Pitreizkewadorski, and as there is no other surname for her, I think we should credit her as Barbara Pitreizkewadorski. Tim and Lucy's surname (Adams) is on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.35.81 (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your catching the spelling error on the BCIA page. Fredricshaffer (talk) 04:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could help. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some IP user requested on Talk:2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games mascots#found some sources... that each picture of the mascot needs to be changed. Read more and reply there. -- JSH-alive ^{talk • cont • mail} 05:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, if you still don't get it, make a PNG version of this, this and this, and first two should contain only Miga and Quatchi respectively. -- JSH-alive ^{talk • cont • mail} 14:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So let me get this right, you convert my original and cropped version to PNG's claiming you found it and cropped it. Then you leave a warning on my talk about the original file. I think they call people like you a pirate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baldboris99 (talk) 1 February 2011

Sorry if I caused any offence. I don't claim to have found the file. It's the same image that you uploaded, just in a more suitable format. The notice I posted is just the standard template to notify the uploader if their file is no longer used. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stop hitting yourself is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop hitting yourself until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was a very poor revert indeed. The article had been marked for cleanup since September 2009. I cleaned up the text by taking out the fluff and leaving only referenced facts in there. I also fixed the infobox. On the other hand, your blind revert reinserted out of date information (the chairman), reinstated the wrong types of dashes, failed to cleanup the article (and meant it was tagged again). Most importantly, you reinserted all the text in the article that is actually a copyright violation, as it is copied and pasted from the club's website.

Please be more careful (and constructive) in future. Cheers, Number 57 18:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Your edit definitely fixed some things, but it also removed a lot of relevant information, and introduced mistakes, leaving the article in a worse state than before. Calling it a "cleanup" is frankly incorrect. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given that 90% of the article text was a copyright violation, I don't think that could be the case. Anyway, if you feel I have left out any relevant information, feel free to add it back in and reference it. Cheers, Number 57 20:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that was the case, an appropriate edit summary would have been something like this: "Removed copyright violation, updated information and removed unsourced statements". If that had been the case, I would probably have been more hesitant to revert. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean 'useless' :D —Half Price 22:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes. Perhaps that would have been a better choice of word! :) Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 23:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mahahahaneapneap. Myself and another editor disagree over which is the better image of the above subject matter, with respect to the Gold Hill article itself and also the Shaftesbury article. The recent history of both those articles reveals the images involved; if you wish to express an opinion, you may do so at my talk page, where the other editor has opened a dialogue. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 21:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input! PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; please don't hesitate to contact me again for similar issues. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 01:05, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For fixing the Southern League Div1 S&W table - on Saturday I somehow contrived to update it with entirely the wrong set of results... not sure how I managed that. Well done for spotting it and getting it sorted. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you've been doing a great job getting the tables updated so quickly this season. I only noticed it because I was looking closely at the table trying to work out where my team (Poole Town) were likely to finish. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 23:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I enjoy it in a strange kind of way. Poole have had a good season, particularly the last few months - I reckon they stand a good chance of winning the play-offs :) Good work with the Cup stats too. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Durdle Door Overview.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 00:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you edit the page. I don't take issue with any criticism of my work on there but I feel it is both irrelevant and insensitive to me to cite the manner of my former partner's death. I hope you will appreciate the strength of feeling I have regarding this matter and agree to my request to remove it. With thanks, Matt Lucas.

Thanks for getting in touch. I understand that it is a sensitive topic and I had no idea it was you editing the page, so I must apologise for appearing insensitive. Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy is such that people are discouraged from editing pages about themselves. I have started a discussion at Talk:Matt Lucas#Former_partner to get some other editors' opinion on whether the sentence is relevant You're more than welcome to put your point across there. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 19:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I don't wish to debate this with any more people than I have to. It's deeply uncomfortable for me, as you will appreciate. I have made my feelings known and I hope you will be able to relay them on my behalf, if you see fit. I sincerely hope this can be resolved with some humanity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.35.84 (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The RfC procedure includes the following rubric: If consensus has been reached before 30 days, the RfC nominator(s) can remove the RfC tag, and the bot will remove the discussion from the list on its next run.

It's my belief that consensus is clear. New comments have dried up. Given that we have a Foundation mandate to be kind to the subjects of BLPs, I would like you to consider closing the RfC. --Dweller (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, thanks. I've closed the RfC. I didn't find any specific procedures for closing, so I hope what I did was right. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. --Dweller (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you update the tables again at any stage, please remember to update the date at the bottom of the table. Otherwise I come along and get halfway through it before I realise it's already been done. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I will remember next time. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I imagine you've put a lot of work into them, but the maps at 2014–15 Western Football League are way, way too big. I have a large-ish screen, but it's too small to show the whole map. They really have to be a lot smaller, along the lines of the Southern League ones. I think we may have hit upon the reason why Step 5–6 articles don't usually have maps – the clubs are too close together to make the maps readable unless they're absolutely huge. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the feedback. I've reduced the map sizes from 800 to 700 pixels in width, and also cropped the images slightly on the northern edge. I've viewed them at 1024x768 resolution, and they fit comfortably on the screen now. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 11:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Artists Against 419 home page (March 30 2006).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sholing FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:You Don't Love Me.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:University of Riverside, California logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brislington FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Horndean FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Petersfield Town FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fa Vase logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert my changes. I'll create page of moombahcore to add more content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madoka79 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:At Play, Vol. 3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mahahahaneapneap! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stoke Gabriel AFC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Laverstock & Ford F.C..png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Delight Mobile.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]