[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Faten Hamama

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleFaten Hamama was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
January 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 14, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 14, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Egyptian actress Faten Hamama has received more than forty awards and starred in almost one hundred films?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 20, 2015.
Current status: Delisted good article

Khul' Law

[edit]

The article mentions that Khul' law was passed in Egypt immediately after 'I want a solution' movie was released. However, this is not completely correct. The khul' law was passed in Egypt in the late 1990s/Early 2000s as far as I remember, which is long after the movie was released. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.131.86.194 (talk) 09:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA

[edit]

The article looks very good; thanks for the diligent research! About the only suggestion I have for further improvement is that it'd be nice if there were a reference in the first paragraph of the "Accomplishments in Egyptian cinema" section, to back up the claim about what Egyptian cinema used to be like and how it was transformed during her acting career. Otherwise, looks very close to FA status to my eyes. --Delirium 23:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Delirium! I struggled for the research on this one; I literally used up every reliable online source. Thanks to the actress's official website administrator and the Egyptian Culture Fund group, I was able to get my hands on a book about the life of Faten Hamama, so the article has a big expansion coming and a whole lot of referencing to do. Thanks again. ← ANAS Talk? 10:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image Image:Faten Wajhqamar.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

Age error

[edit]

"Hamama made her screen debut in 1939, when she was only nine years old." Is mathmatically impossible if her birth year (1931) is correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.139.67.70 (talk) 11:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Faten Hamama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

At first glance this looked like an acceptable GA; it is well referenced and reasonably well written. After closer scrutiny though, it seems clear that it has some serious issues that have to be addressed before it can keep its status.

  • The most serious issue, in my eyes, is with the "Accomplishments in Egyptian cinema" section. The first paragraph makes several strong assertions, but there are no references to back it up. This continues into the second paragraph as well. Without references this appears as WP:OR and potentially WP:POV, no matter how well researched it is.
  • A couple of the assertions are repeated twice in the article; this goes for Omar Sharif and the kiss, as well as the Khul' story. In the latter case, a direct connection also needs to be made between the actress's role and the new legislation. If this connection can not be shown to have been made by some external, reliable source, then the assertion appears as novel synthesis.
  • Awards and honors - this section should go, or be edited down, preferably to a prose section. Since the fork already exists, there is no need for this long list in the article.
  • There is far too much peacock terms and flowery prose than what is acceptable in an encyclopaedic article. Examples are: "realized the young actress's talent", "was in search of her real identity", "their romantic relationship clearly evident on screen", "they fell in love", "Having learned from experience".

If anyone is interested in addressing these issues, please contact me, and I'll give a more thorough review. Lampman (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. Lampman (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silly wording

[edit]

In the death and funeral section: "Faten Hamama died on January 17, 2015, aged 83 due to health problems. Her son Tarek Sharif did not state the exact cause of death."

Then in the next section: "They resided in Cairo until her death on 17 January 2015 following a short illness"

That's a needlessly verbose and clumsy way of telling that we know almost nothing about the cause of death, other that it was natural. 89.134.220.47 (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Faten Hamama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faten Hamama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Faten Hamama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]