Talk:Bessborough Reservoir

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lakes Low‑importance Bessborough Reservoir is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Surrey Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bessborough Reservoir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023055738/http://www.appscourtfarm.com/carboot.htm to http://www.appscourtfarm.com/carboot.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There has not been much point in trying to sort this one out as long as 101.178.163.208 and N0n3up have been edit-warring over it. None of them has even mentioned the content, just fighting about whose responsibility it is to take it to the talk page, which – needless to say – none of them has done. "The article remained neutral until you changed it" and "stop vandalising the page!" are examples of the "arguments". The count is currently 8–8. Will the match go to extra time? And a penalty shoot-out? Seriously, this is plain disruptive. I will use the current break to try to stop the silliness once and for all.

Simple facts: There are four reservoirs in the area, three of which are mentioned in the article. Whatever is not neutral about mentioning the fourth is beyond me. I will add the fourth, explaining the geography in somewhat more detail. --T*U (talk) 08:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]