User talk:ReneeWrites/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello ReneeWrites, could you please remove the watermarks from this photo?
Byejai (talk) 16:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Byejai: Yeah, I can take a crack at that. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Remove the Watermark
Article(s): Category:Sue England
- Request
- Could please be possible to remove watermarks from this file? Byejai (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
| Thank you for vectorizing many Japanese Municipal flags, some have come in handy for a project that I am working on (that relies on svg flags). Strenatos (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
- You're very welcome, I'm glad they came in handy. And thank you for the barnstar ^^ ReneeWrites (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
A question
Hello, I have seen your contributions to the Japanese municipal flags project, and have also seen you talk about it, so I was wondering if there was a link to a Wiki project for it? Thank you. Strenatos (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Strenatos: I find the flags that still need a vector version via this page (which gets updated weekly by a bot): Top 200 symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics and this category: Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics (this one gets updated in real-time). ReneeWrites (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your information. Strenatos (talk) 23:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) ReneeWrites (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your information. Strenatos (talk) 23:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Help with overwriting an image
Greetings, I have sent a request to overwrite File:Bandera de la confeferacion muisca.JPG so I can replace it with a higher quality image. Popayan1210 (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Popayan1210: Could you upload your version to Imgur and link it here so I can see which version you want to replace it with? ReneeWrites (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - De Ganzenpas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - De Ganzenpas 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Dobberen voorkant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Gebroken 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - De Ganzenpas 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Ontkleuren 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hedof - Wings of Paradise.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of Our Lady across the river Dijle 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 10.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Ontkleuren 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - 8.000.000.000 buitenkant 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilige Moeder Gods kerk Effen voorkant.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilige Moeder Gods kerk Effen 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marksluis, Oosterhout 2023-08-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burgemeester Kerstenslaan 16, Breda zijkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cream Trabant 601 S side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue Volkswagen Beetle side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 41, Wagenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sandoel Raamsdonksveer Watersnoodwoningen 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Betoverd 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beekstraat 72, Breda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument Gesneuvelden Indonesië, Hooge Zwaluwe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Scheve Brug bij Terheijden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen De Arend, Terheijden 2023-06-14-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen De Arend, Terheijden 2023-06-14-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Dobberen voorkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Zware last 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bredaseweg 8, Terheijden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Gouden Regen detail 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Leegte 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - You'll never walk alone 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Entree Sint-Laurentiuskerk, Ginneken 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle grafsteen 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle ceiling.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Markt 26, Breda 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Retouch
Can you please increase image resolution?
Aurelio de Sandoval Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 02:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Aurelio de Sandoval: I went to the source file and took a screenshot of this frame at the highest resolution, but it didn't change the quality of the image. So unless a higher-resolution source file can be found, this is as good as it gets. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Afwas 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle grafsteen 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 26, Terheijden voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Binnenkant Hoog Catharijne 2023-08-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 6, Hooge Zwaluwe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 8, Drimmelen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen Zeldenrust, Hooge Zwaluwe 2023-06-14-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bibliotheek Breda Centrum mural 2023 - 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groenendijk 2, Lage Zwaluwe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Magnolia liliiflora 2024-03-18-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toyota Dome - Raamsdonksveer 4 - crop.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle doopkapel.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Vredenburcht 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zwaluwseweg Hooge Zwaluwe, zicht op Protestantse Kerk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ginnekenweg 291, Breda 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 41, Wagenberg voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Road signs in China
Greetings! Thank you so much for uploading SVG versions of the missing images. Some of the signs have changed design though, with the latest standard being File:GB 5768.2-2022.pdf. Fry1989 eh? 19:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Fry1989: I appreciate the heads up and the work you did. Looking at the pdf it appears the signs use a different color than the one I got from the source images. Would this mean all the files in Category:SVG warning road signs of China need updating, not just the ones with updated icons? (I don't mind doing this, but I want to make sure I get this right so I don't end up frustrating you or giving you more work needlessly in the process.)
- I also appreciate the up-to-date source file on the Chinese road signs, there's a number of other signs I wanted to work on that appear to have outdated source images. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm glad we can work together.
- In regards to which symbols have been re-designed and which have not, it is a bit tricky. There's very obvious changes like File:China road sign 警 33.svg where the symbol was flipped around in the 2022 revision, but some of the others require a very close eye to notice the differences. It does not help that the 2022 standard is the only one with actual construction sheets for each sign included (starting on page 236). To be honest, I wonder if I am being too discriminating. For example, the gaps in the windsock on File:China road sign 警 16.svg appear to have been made larger on the 2022 version. The shape of the smoke on File:China road sign 警 29.svg appears to have changed as well. Are these just superficial differences, or were the symbols actually re-designed? I don't know because the 2009 version does not have construction sheets to compare with. Perhaps you can advise me of your opinion. I can list each sign individually that appears to have been changed in some way, and you can let me know what you think.
- As for the colour, real life examples do appear to show a darker yellow in use. If you would like to use the 2022 booklet as the colour palette, you are welcome to do so. Fry1989 eh? 16:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: My personal preference would be to just re-do the whole set, especially considering we have a really good reference for these signs. The older designs that were uploaded previously aren't wrong so much as outdated, so for those I would prefer the files to be renamed and moved to the Historical signs subcat rather than overwritten, also freeing up their original filenames. Would you be alright with this, or would this be too drastic? ReneeWrites (talk) 10:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have the time to spare to re-do them all, that would be great. The overwrite point you raise, I am not certain I understand. Do you mean you wish to upload every sign as a completely new file? I'm not sure that is necessary for signs that have not changed. For example, were it me, I would simply overwrite File:CN road sign 警 17.svg with my improvements to the drawing. Or am I misunderstanding your intentions?
- @Fry1989: My personal preference would be to just re-do the whole set, especially considering we have a really good reference for these signs. The older designs that were uploaded previously aren't wrong so much as outdated, so for those I would prefer the files to be renamed and moved to the Historical signs subcat rather than overwritten, also freeing up their original filenames. Would you be alright with this, or would this be too drastic? ReneeWrites (talk) 10:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- As for the colour, real life examples do appear to show a darker yellow in use. If you would like to use the 2022 booklet as the colour palette, you are welcome to do so. Fry1989 eh? 16:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- With the file names, I am in the process of moving those signs which have not changed from "China road sign X 00" to "CN road sign X 00", since many of the signs were re-numbered. This also follows the naming convention for several other countries such as Russia and Ukraine, and uses the ISO country code. This way, you can upload the missing signs without the need for us to do any renaming, we can simply leave the older versions under their old name. This is what I did with File:China road sign 警 33.svg, leaving it under that old name and uploading the new sign under the new name File:CN road sign 警 12-1.svg. Does that make sense?
- One other point I would like to raise. Since we have the actual dimensions for File:China road sign blank.svg, with your permission, I would like to re-draw it to those dimensions. This is how I create my files, such as File:CL road sign RPI-1.svg, with 1 pixel = 1 millimetre. What are your thoughts? Fry1989 eh? 15:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: The reason I'm thinking of uploading new files instead of overwriting the current ones is so we have two versions of the signs, the old/historic ones and the current ones. That way we could have two complete sets instead of having "gaps" where old signs were overwritten instead of renamed. Even if the old signs' symbols haven't changed, the color would still be different.
- I also don't think a new version of the signs I've uploaded is needed. The size of SVG files isn't calculated in pixels, upscaling or downscaling them doesn't really change anything about the quality or the resolution itself. Though I will keep the 1 pixel = 1 mm thing in mind for the future. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see. That is not how I would do it, but if that is how you really wish to do it, I can move them back to their old names without a redirect. In the meantime, I have made some alterations that may interest you. I have redrawn the triangle according to the dimensions on pages 17-18 and applied it to File:China road sign 警 38.svg and File:CN road sign 警 36.svg. This way of creating the signs is more relevant when there are construction sheets for the symbols that display the actual dimensions, such as the manual from Chile. Since the Chinese manual does not have construction sheets for the symbols with actual dimensions, but instead just a basic grid, it's not really possible to make the symbols exactly accurate anyway. So I understand your viewpoint that it is an unnecessary step. You will also notice that I have greatly improved the symbol on those two files. I was able to do so thanks to the working version of the standard, GB 5768.2-XXXX. It has a handful of signs in the vector format, although most are not. Let me know your thoughts. Fry1989 eh? 20:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you would like to continue uploading new versions of the signs, you can certainly do so. However, there is one minor issue. If I move File:CN road sign 警 1-1.svg back to "China road sign 警 1a.svg" without a redirect freeing up the namespace "CN road sign 警 1-1.svg", but there is no new file to fill that namespace, there are bots that start removing it from projects because it is as if no such file exists. This would be disruptive to the projects. For that reason, I would recommend you upload your version under some meaningless temporary name like "Temp file 57.svg". Once you do so, I can move the older version back to "China road sign 警 1a.svg" and then move "Temp file 57.svg" to "CN road sign 警 1-1.svg" right after. That will provide seamless replacement without the bots getting in the way. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: Thanks for the heads up, and the advice. I'll let you know the file names once I get around to uploading them 🙂
- Also, you did wonderful work on the signs you mentioned in the earlier message, they look really good now. (Apologies for not replying sooner!) ReneeWrites (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you would like to continue uploading new versions of the signs, you can certainly do so. However, there is one minor issue. If I move File:CN road sign 警 1-1.svg back to "China road sign 警 1a.svg" without a redirect freeing up the namespace "CN road sign 警 1-1.svg", but there is no new file to fill that namespace, there are bots that start removing it from projects because it is as if no such file exists. This would be disruptive to the projects. For that reason, I would recommend you upload your version under some meaningless temporary name like "Temp file 57.svg". Once you do so, I can move the older version back to "China road sign 警 1a.svg" and then move "Temp file 57.svg" to "CN road sign 警 1-1.svg" right after. That will provide seamless replacement without the bots getting in the way. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see. That is not how I would do it, but if that is how you really wish to do it, I can move them back to their old names without a redirect. In the meantime, I have made some alterations that may interest you. I have redrawn the triangle according to the dimensions on pages 17-18 and applied it to File:China road sign 警 38.svg and File:CN road sign 警 36.svg. This way of creating the signs is more relevant when there are construction sheets for the symbols that display the actual dimensions, such as the manual from Chile. Since the Chinese manual does not have construction sheets for the symbols with actual dimensions, but instead just a basic grid, it's not really possible to make the symbols exactly accurate anyway. So I understand your viewpoint that it is an unnecessary step. You will also notice that I have greatly improved the symbol on those two files. I was able to do so thanks to the working version of the standard, GB 5768.2-XXXX. It has a handful of signs in the vector format, although most are not. Let me know your thoughts. Fry1989 eh? 20:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- One other point I would like to raise. Since we have the actual dimensions for File:China road sign blank.svg, with your permission, I would like to re-draw it to those dimensions. This is how I create my files, such as File:CL road sign RPI-1.svg, with 1 pixel = 1 millimetre. What are your thoughts? Fry1989 eh? 15:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beeld Sint Norbertus.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beeld heilige familie, Rijsbergen.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Scheve Brug bij Terheijden ochtend 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - La Révolution 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hercules beeld Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle interieur 10.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Gouden Regen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Global Replace Request
File:Shinkansen blue.svg->File:Shinkansen jrc.svg
File:Shinkansen green.svg->File:Shinkansen jre.svg
File:Shinkansen-E.png->File:Shinkansen jre.svg
File:Shinkansen-K.png->File:Shinkansen jrk.svg
File:Shinkansen red.svg->File:Shinkansen jrk.svg
File:Shinkansen blue.png->File:Shinkansen jrw.svg
File:Shinkansen-W.png->File:Shinkansen jrw.svg
I am not a filemover so I can't complete the task. Can you do it for me please? 阿南之人 (talk) 12:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Afwas 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stoel - Stationsplein Utrecht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help!
|
Gifting you the PowerMac G5 for your help! |
| Thank you User:ReneeWrites for helping me by vectorizing most of Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics you can, and extremely sorry for harrassing you and other WikiComms users when I was desperate to get my job done.
The fact you shifted your focus away from my working category made me worry and you left me all alone doing all the things I'm doing in that category I'm working on without any warning. But, you're not alone. I know you're engaged in other things, and so do the others. So, I think I shouldn't blame you for that. Now, I need your company, so that we would contribute together, as I learned my lessons from you. Don't you mind clearing the category I made for replacing old flags and emblems I've got with their vector versions? That got 62 files and counting, and I wanted to clear it. So, I need you to do that. I would like you to tell me your opinions about it. Thank you for helping me, and apologies for my stupid mistakes I made to you. I hope you're doing better, and please let me know what you think about my PowerMac :). See you in a bit. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 11:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
- Hey @OperationSakura6144: , welcome back. I'm temporarily working on other things but I haven't forgotten about the town emblems, and I'll return to that corner of Commons soon enough! I'll also see about clearing the category you made. I appreciate the PowerMac, as well as the apologies. I am doing better now, and I hope you are too. ReneeWrites (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cleared all of them, except File:Flag of Tokashiki Okinawa.JPG - there's a deletion request open for the vector version, so I'll wait and see how that goes. ReneeWrites (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I reuploaded File:Flag of Tokashiki, Okinawa.svg. I had to delete that file and reupload it because there are some imperfecions I find it off. Anyway, you can proceed clearing Category:Flags of municipialities of Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available and thank you for clearing most of my category. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cleared all of them, except File:Flag of Tokashiki Okinawa.JPG - there's a deletion request open for the vector version, so I'll wait and see how that goes. ReneeWrites (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
When tagging for speedy ...
Hi. When tagging something for speedy or any sort of deletion, please do not remove the other corresponding information in the file, please simply prepend the template with your reason contained. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: Does this also mean keeping the categories on them intact? Because the issue was that someone had created a huge amount of categories that were part of very elaborate category tree structures that were often self-referential, but contained no or very little media. I wanted it to be clear that these categories were empty. ReneeWrites (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand that it is tricky, and if that was occurring, then a note in the deletion request would have been helpful. you need to understand that I was having to start somewhere in what I was being asked to speedy delete, and there was no breadcrumbs or indicators of what was occurring. So, preferably for such a large cleanup with that body of research by you, there should be a deletion discussion where we can drop a good list of what we have seen and what we are cleaning up, then reference that list in the deletion request. All of this allows us to show our workings, either immediately for someone to follow our work, or for a future time when someone may just need to unpick the story when someone comes up with the "brilliant" idea next time. We are trying to indicate that we are working to a consensus, either in an individual conversation or based on the principles that are explained by our policies. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: The discussions were happening at the village pump and at CfD, and there was a consensus at both. I indeed didn't start a deletion request, but the page for that indicated CfD was the right avenue for that when it comes to categories. Regardless, I really appreciate the help with cleaning these up, and I'll make sure to tag them appropriately next time. ReneeWrites (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, then please point to the conversations. Please don't expect every admin doing deletions to have explicit knowledge of all such conversations. Life is too busy. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: The Village Pump discussion is here: Steamboat Willie
- Entries at Categories for Discussion are these:
- A related CfD is still open here:
- ReneeWrites (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, then please point to the conversations. Please don't expect every admin doing deletions to have explicit knowledge of all such conversations. Life is too busy. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: The discussions were happening at the village pump and at CfD, and there was a consensus at both. I indeed didn't start a deletion request, but the page for that indicated CfD was the right avenue for that when it comes to categories. Regardless, I really appreciate the help with cleaning these up, and I'll make sure to tag them appropriately next time. ReneeWrites (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand that it is tricky, and if that was occurring, then a note in the deletion request would have been helpful. you need to understand that I was having to start somewhere in what I was being asked to speedy delete, and there was no breadcrumbs or indicators of what was occurring. So, preferably for such a large cleanup with that body of research by you, there should be a deletion discussion where we can drop a good list of what we have seen and what we are cleaning up, then reference that list in the deletion request. All of this allows us to show our workings, either immediately for someone to follow our work, or for a future time when someone may just need to unpick the story when someone comes up with the "brilliant" idea next time. We are trying to indicate that we are working to a consensus, either in an individual conversation or based on the principles that are explained by our policies. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Main page overlapping with a menu in Vector 2022
Hey, I'm Szymon, I work with the team building the skins. About a month ago, you posted a comment pointing at this issue. Thanks for sharing that! As it happens (:D), recently, the team has been fixing related problems with wide tables (and maybe this problem too). Do you still experience this? Could you check? I remember I could replicate it on Chrome a month ago, but now it looks like it works for me. Thanks! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SGrabarczuk (WMF): sorry for taking so long to respond! Somehow I'd missed this message or forgot to reply. But I just gave the new skin a try and the problem indeed seems to have been fixed. I took a quick look on a few other pages / files to see if anything came up and everything seems to work :) ReneeWrites (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's ok. Thanks! Soon I'll want to talk to the Commons community about making Vector 2022 the default here as well, so... I really want to identify problems ahead of time, if possible. SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 19:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red DAF 46 three-quarter front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red Saab 900 Turbo side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 6, Hooge Zwaluwe voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sint-Trudokerk Zundert biechtstoel houtsnijwerk 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 26, Terheijden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaquette Napoleon, Boschstraat Breda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! White Škoda Kodiaq three-quarter front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red Volkswagen Beetle three-quarter front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red Volkswagen Beetle side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mastbos Torendreef 2024-05-01-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Entree Sint-Laurentiuskerk, Ginneken 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haagweg 339, Breda voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catharina van Alexandrië.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De Hoop, Princenhage 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Watertoren Wilhelminasingel Breda 20230823 - 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zuidwal 99, Geertruidenberg.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Galium odoratum 2024-04-30-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 46, Wagenberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Betoverd 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mastbos Torendreef 2024-05-01-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda pilaar fresco 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan van Polanen II 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan van Polanen II 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan I van Nassau 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau 3 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau 4 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mural Sint Bavostraat 79, Rijsbergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda preekstoel detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda zijbeuk 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda trap met zingende engel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda preekstoel 2 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda preekstoel 3 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda pilaar fresco wijdingskruis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda preekstoel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda deur kapittelzaal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dizzy - Rogier Ruys - Steenakker Breda 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dizzy - Rogier Ruys - Steenakker Breda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Memento-mori-steen (close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda vloermessing engel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda koorhek 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Zware last 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Vinyl detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vrijheid - Peer Eltink - Steenakker Breda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Prinsenbank 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sint-Trudokerk Zundert biechtstoel houtsnijwerk 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda zingende engel 1 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gé Smit - A Honour to St. Joost 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 35, Wagenberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 35, Wagenberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fin DAC - Kokesh.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De Vlucht uit Breda 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 35, Wagenberg voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gasthuisstraat 8, Geertruidenberg.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle preekstoel houtsnijwerk 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilig Hartbeeld Oosterhout.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilig Hartbeeld Teteringen.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhoutselaan 69-71, Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moments Contained - Thomas J. Price 1 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moments Contained - Thomas J. Price 2 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De Laatste Der Argonauten 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De Laatste Der Argonauten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nieuwe Ginnekenstraat - Passage Zuidpoort 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nieuwe Ginnekenstraat - Passage Zuidpoort 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle hoogaltaar detail 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vlucht van de techniek, Raamsdonksveer 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Van Coothplein 16-22, Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vismarktstraat 26, Geertruidenberg.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhoutselaan 67, Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhoutselaan 15, Breda 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zuidwal 71, Geertruidenberg.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Volkswagen T2 camper with high roof.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verkeersbord G12a Pastoor van Vessemstraat, Zundert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Richtingbord Pastoor van Vessemstraat, Zundert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel tondo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda koorhek 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda koorhek 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De Laatste Der Argonauten close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Koorbanken Noord houtsnijwerk zijkant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Koorbanken Noord houtsnijwerk zijkant 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle interieur 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel tondo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Topaasstraat 54, Breda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 |
File:Logo Le Coq Sportif.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Fma12 (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
|
File:Logo Le Coq Sportif.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan I van Nassau 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan van Polanen II detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 10 wapen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 09 wapen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Poolse Kapel - Madonna (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Koorbanken Noord houtsnijwerk zijkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen De Arend, Terheijden 2023-06-14-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laundromat Wasknijper, Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda Memento-mori-steen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gé Smit - A Honour to St. Joost 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau detail 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het komt allemaal wel goed, zo niet dan toch 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!
Hi, Greetings
The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!
We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.
Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.
We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.
Thank you,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plateau Heilig Hartbeeld, Kerkplein Raamsdonk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 13 wapen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het Blauwe Roodborstje 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafzerk 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raamsdonk Sint-Bavokerk buitenkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stationsstraat 8, Made.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Postcard
Please help translate to your language
Hello ReneeWrites/Archive 2!
We extend our warmest greetings and gratitude to you for actively taking part in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Commons photography competition. Your valuable contributions have significantly enriched the world's knowledge and cultural heritage.
We are delighted to inform you that your efforts have placed you among the top 100 uploaders during this project. As a token of our appreciation, we would like to send you a special postcard.
To ensure you receive your special postcard postcard, kindly complete this form before August 15, 2024.
Looking ahead, we hope to see you again in February 2025 for the next exciting event.
Thank you once again for your dedication and Wikilove.
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Equipment
Hello Renee,
i rejected two of your nominations.
You're a good photographer, but the quality of smartphone photos has a limit. You can get a high-quality shot outdoors in sunlight, but for interiors the lighting is not enough with such equipment. Even used A DSLR camera and one fixed lens will help you create great shots.
With best regards, George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @George Chernilevsky:
- Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review my nominations. I understand the reasons behind the rejection. I'm aware of the limitations of smartphone cameras, especially in low-light environments, and have been looking into other options. One of the key factors for me is finding a camera that makes good photos while still maintaining a compact size, so that I can easily carry it with me (this is for me the main appeal of smartphones). This one caught my interest, and it isn't cheap, but if I got a camera that's too bulky (even if it's just as good or better and costs less) I'll probably end up rarely using it.
- Anyway, let me know what you think. Best regards, ReneeWrites (talk) 20:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Renee,
i looked at the Rickon specs. I have never seen a camera from this manufacturer before, but i have used a few other similar cameras.
I believe that the Rikon will produce much better images than a smartphone, however, the Rikon has weaker optics than the competition, as far as i could tell from the specifications.Therefore, i recommend also looking at
- Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX15EE
And to the question of bulkiness. I often go for walks in the forest with my granddaughter (she is now 9 years old). My equipment for such walks:
- camera body;
- 3 lenses (50 mm, 24 mm and 100 mm macro);
- 2 tripods (small for macro and full-size);
- flash and diffusers.
One SLR camera + one lens for walking around the city is not a problem at all, but this technique allows you to take excellent quality pictures.
Best regards, George --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Batterij 8, Drimmelen voordeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Batterij 12A, Drimmelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het Blauwe Roodborstje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pastoor Doensstraat 2A, Bavel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pastoor Doensstraat 2A mural, Bavel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen Hoop Doet Leven, Made 2023-06-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ginnekenweg 145, Breda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Batterij 8, Drimmelen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Batterij 8, Drimmelen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wijnand Zijlmans - Onbegrensd 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument Jan van Polanen II 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haagsemarkt 16A, Princenhage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Source
In the CoA QI candidates the source is directly in the Municipality page. And usually it isn't needed. Though, i am going to put it. Can you remove the decline message when i have done it? Thanks Ashoppio (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ashoppio: I will, the lack of sourcing was my only objection. I appreciate the fast response. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ReneeWrites Thank you. I have put new CoA's, please don't decline them, as i will put a source for them in a manner of minutes. Thank for the comprehension. Ashoppio (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ashoppio: No problem. I saw that sources were added and removed my opposing votes. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ReneeWrites Thank you very much! For the coa of Casanova Lerrone i'll add the source tomorrow, as it is quite late now. Thanks again. Ashoppio (talk) 22:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I also saw that you promoted my other images. Thank you very much! Ashoppio (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Your CoAs are beautiful, you do good work :) ReneeWrites (talk) 15:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I also saw that you promoted my other images. Thank you very much! Ashoppio (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ReneeWrites Thank you very much! For the coa of Casanova Lerrone i'll add the source tomorrow, as it is quite late now. Thanks again. Ashoppio (talk) 22:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ashoppio: No problem. I saw that sources were added and removed my opposing votes. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ReneeWrites Thank you. I have put new CoA's, please don't decline them, as i will put a source for them in a manner of minutes. Thank for the comprehension. Ashoppio (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moersebaan 2, Zundert, dienstgebouw 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau - Engelbrecht I and Johanna van Polanen with saints.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bruin plaatsnaambord Hooge Zwaluwe aan de Kerkdijk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaatsnaambord Hooge Zwaluwe aan de Kerkdijk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 10, Hooge Zwaluwe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 10, Hooge Zwaluwe voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gaete 3, Lage Zwaluwe voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raamsdonk Sint-Bavokerk buitenkant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2023 - Dobberen onderkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sint Annakapel Breda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het Blauwe Roodborstje 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Het Blauwe Roodborstje 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorpsstraat 4, Drimmelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
De Hoop, Princenhage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpanelen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpanelen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raamsdonk Sint-Bavokerk glas-in-lood raam vestibule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amsterdam Schiphol Treinstation lift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raadhuisstraat 33, Terheijden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Grave monument of Jan I van Nassau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Pastorie, Sint-Laurentiuskerk (Ulvenhout).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpanelen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Request by TemaGub2002
Hello, @ReneeWrites: TemaGub2002 just want to overwrite File:DC Comics 2024.svg with better source from Logopedia, which had the white background. Could you please grant the user a right to overwrite the file. Thanks for your attention.
Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Overwriting_existing_files/Requests#:~:text=Only%20users%20with%20Autopatrol%20rights,particular%20file%20on%20this%20page. Yayan550 (talk) 06:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I added the template, but for future reference requests like this go to COM:OWR, not my talk page. If someone made a request and it hasn't been fielded yet you can ping me or someone else on that page. ReneeWrites (talk) 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Villa Vredenburcht in Bréda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau - Maria van Loon-Heinsberg and John IV of Nassau with saints.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpaneel 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tilburg Centraal Station Mosaicpanelen 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Topaasstraat 54, Breda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Problem in VI
Thank you for your work on VI where you will always be welcome. But it seems that closing promoted images is causing problems. There is a blocked image (Agostino Scilla. The philosopher Epicurus.jpg) that will be ignored by the bot and will be lost. My images that you closed are causing big display problems on my talk page. I spent time trying to understand the problem but I couldn't find it. I suggest that you don't close promoted images to avoid this inconvenience, thank you.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I apologise for the inconvenience, I had no idea! I saw that the image you mentioned did get promoted, but not removed from the page, so I removed it manually. I hope that's okay. I'll refrain from closing the vote on further VI entries. ReneeWrites (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld - Griffioen - Hans van Bentem - Kloosterlaan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Ginnekenstraat 20 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Appartementencomplex De Poort van Breda 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 1 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Ginnekenweg 74–76 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Mass deletion of "History of" categories
Good evening! Why did you let those categories be deleted? Was there an overall discussion that "History of" categories are outdated? It is common use to sort those categories like this... I look forward to your feedback. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Fantaglobe11: There have been various discussions on using "History" or "Historical" as a descriptor and every time there's almost unanimous agreement to have these phased out in favor of "by year/decade/century". History is not a good defining term for categorizing media, as there is no clear cut-off period when something is considered history or historical, and when it's not.
- COM:Categories for discussion/2023/04/Category:History of Africa by century
- COM:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Historical speeches
- COM:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Historical images
- The categories I tagged in particular only contained one subcategory, the "year of" metacat, so I moved that to the main category and cut out the middleman. For instance Category:History of Oosterhout, North Brabant only contains Category:Oosterhout, North Brabant by year, which in turn has subcategories for 2020 through 2024. This ties into the issue of "when is something history?". If I was looking for pictures of Oosterhout made this year it would make sense to look under "Oosterhout by year > Oosterhout in 2024" rather than to first go to "History of Oosterhout". The same reasoning applies to Category:History of Alphen-Chaam and Category:History of Baarle-Nassau. These categories were not made to make media more findable, nor to diffuse a container category that was getting too crowded. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello ReneeWrites, thank you for your detailed answer. I understand the difficulty with the term "history". At all Wikimedia projects, we are used to avoid the term "now". For this reason, everything is history or future. There is no present, because tomorrow today is past. As long as categories like Berlin by year or Amsterdam by year are a subcategory of the corresponding "History of" category, there seems to be no agreement at all that "by year" categories should not be a subcategory of the "History of" categories. Moreover, it is not forbidden for categories to have one subcategory. Unless you can prove me wrong. Have a good Monday tomorrow. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Fantaglobe11: you're right that I misread the conclusion of the discussion. "History of" categories are fine, though categories like "Historical images/photographs" etc. should be phased out. ReneeWrites (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fantaglobe11: now that I'm pinging you anyway, you too have a good day tomorrow! And the remainder of today! ReneeWrites (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Fantaglobe11: you're right that I misread the conclusion of the discussion. "History of" categories are fine, though categories like "Historical images/photographs" etc. should be phased out. ReneeWrites (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello ReneeWrites, thank you for your detailed answer. I understand the difficulty with the term "history". At all Wikimedia projects, we are used to avoid the term "now". For this reason, everything is history or future. There is no present, because tomorrow today is past. As long as categories like Berlin by year or Amsterdam by year are a subcategory of the corresponding "History of" category, there seems to be no agreement at all that "by year" categories should not be a subcategory of the "History of" categories. Moreover, it is not forbidden for categories to have one subcategory. Unless you can prove me wrong. Have a good Monday tomorrow. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Griffioen (Hans van Bentem), sculpture in a niche atop the facade of the former Breda Courthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout - front facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watertoren, Wilhelminasingel, Breda - oblique front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vuurtoren, Academiesingel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ettensebaan 10, Breda view from the street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watertoren, Speelhuislaan, Breda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Little green men
Category:Little Green Men (Toy Story), is the name used on https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/Little_Green_Men. Sahaib (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
GA1 is only for gallery pages with zero or one image, not for two!!
I see that you add Speedy deletions to a lot of gallery pages of populated places. But reason GA1 is only for gallery pages with zero or one image, not for two!! For other reasons you need to make a proper deletion request! JopkeB (talk) 17:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @JopkeB: appreciate you reaching out. If you don't mind me asking a few questions about this, is there a way to file a deletion request that doesn't notify the gallery creator (who has made it abundantly clear that he doesn't want to be bothered about this), and would a regular deletion request even go anywhere if galleries with two images are allowed to stay? ReneeWrites (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- 1) No, I do not know a way to file a deletion request without alerting the creator. I already explained it to him (see User_talk:Steinbach#Etten-Leur) that it is not possible to stop this.
- 2) A regular deletion request can be honored if you give good arguments. JopkeB (talk) 03:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Appartementencomplex De Poort van Breda 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2024 - De Natuur Ontwaakt 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Belcrumwatertoren 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel Vuurtoren vanaf Park Valkenberg 2024-08-17-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Ettensebaan 10 2024-08-21-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Appartementencomplex De Poort van Breda 2024-08-05-3 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2024 - Hebzucht 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2024 - Hebzucht detail 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Belcrumwatertoren 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 22 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 9A 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel 1 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel - Spoorstraat 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Sint-Antoniuskathedraal, Breda, statue on cathedral's facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Vuurtoren 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Wilhelminapark 19 gevelsteen 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal gebrandschilderd raam Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal gebrandschilderd raam Sint Antonius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Ettensebaan 10 2024-08-21-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|